Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 07 September 2026

Simba vs Mtibwa Sugar: match statistics

Simba crest
Simba
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Mtibwa Sugar crest
Mtibwa Sugar
165%(1.18)
X25%(5.40)
210%(14.00)

Simba presents impressive home form with a 75% win rate and only 25% losses at their own stadium, averaging 2.25 goals with a 20% conversion rate. The hosts hold a significant advantage in possession (58% vs 45%) and a clearly better xG balance (1.82 vs 0.94), evidencing their offensive dominance. Mtibwa Sugar has not won a single away match this season (0% wins), failing to score in 100% of matches on the road, which is an alarming sign. The difference in quality is obvious—Simba has a +7 goal difference at home, whereas the visitors are -3 on their travels. Given all statistics, a decisive victory for the hosts is the most probable scenario for this match.

Simba vs Mtibwa Sugar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Simba played Mtibwa Sugar in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 18 January 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Simba: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Mtibwa Sugar: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Simba scores 2.20 and concedes 0.60 goals per match. Mtibwa Sugar scores 0.50 and concedes 0.50. League average: 1.69 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Simba 20%, Mtibwa Sugar 13%. Over 2.5: Simba 80%, Mtibwa Sugar 13%. League level: BTTS 25%, Over 2.5 25%.

xG, shots and style

Simba has higher xG: 1.52 vs 0.99. Simba: 6.2 shots per match, Mtibwa Sugar: 3.5.

Match halves

Simba: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 1.20. Mtibwa Sugar: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.13.

Goals by minute

Simba: 31-45+ (3 goals). Mtibwa Sugar: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 1.69 goals per match, BTTS 25%, Over 2.5 25%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Simba presents impressive home form with a 75% win rate and only 25% losses at their own stadium, averaging 2.25 goals with a 20% conversion rate. The hosts hold a significant advantage in possession (58% vs 45%) and a clearly better xG balance (1.82 vs 0.94), evidencing their offensive dominance. Mtibwa Sugar has not won a single away match this season (0% wins), failing to score in 100% of matches on the road, which is an alarming sign. The difference in quality is obvious—Simba has a +7 goal difference at home, whereas the visitors are -3 on their travels. Given all statistics, a decisive victory for the hosts is the most probable scenario for this match.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
20Shots7
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
6Shots on target4
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
2.56xG1.02
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
9Corners2
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
122Dangerous attacks39
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
11Fouls12
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
0Cards0
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.2Goals scored / match0.5
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
0.6Goals conceded / match0.5
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
47%Average possession36%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
3Shots on target / match1.63
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.2Shots per match3.5
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
3Shots on target1.63
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
35.5%Shot conversion14.3%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
47%Possession36%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
1.52xG for0.99
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
0.66xG against1.36
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

Shooting quality

Simba: Counter-attackingMtibwa Sugar: Counter-attacking
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
Accuracy (shots on target)48%47%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.250.28
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.730.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Simba is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Simba · 1.2 pts / match - Mtibwa Sugar

Simba
WWWWL
Season result split
80% W0% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-1
Last 5 at home
3-0-1
WWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 0.66BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 80%
Mtibwa Sugar
DLDWD
Season result split
25% W50% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-2
1.25 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-2
Last 5 away
0-3-2
LDLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 0.88Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Simba is 340% better for: goals scored per match.

2.2 goals / match - Simba · 0.5 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar

Mtibwa Sugar is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.6 goals / match - Simba · 0.5 goals / match - Mtibwa Sugar

Simba scoring profile: mixed

Simba scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Mtibwa Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 63% (5 of 8 matches).

Mtibwa Sugar scoring profile: more difficult

Mtibwa Sugar scores in 25% of matches (2 of 8 matches), while Simba keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 matches).

11Goals scored (season)4
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
3Goals conceded (season)4
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
2.8Average goals in match1
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
11Goals scored (last 5)2
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
3Goals conceded (last 5)3
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal25%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
80%2 goals25%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
60%3 goals0%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
0%4 goals0%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

How often they concede at least...

40%1 goal38%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
20%2 goals13%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
0%3 goals0%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
0%4 goals0%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time13%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
0%BTTS in both halves0%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
60%Scored in both halves13%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS13%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
60%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
20%BTTS - last 520%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time38%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time25%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Simba is 193% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.2 pts / match - Simba · 0.75 pts / match - Mtibwa Sugar

Simba - half-time state
60% leading40% draw0% trailing
Mtibwa Sugar - half-time state
0% leading75% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.2Points per match (1st half)0.75
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
1Goals scored (1st half)0.13
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
1Average goals (1st half)0.5
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
100%Clean sheet before half-time63%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
40%No goal before half-time88%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

After half-time (2nd half)

2.4Points per match (2nd half)1.13
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
1.2Goals scored (2nd half)0.13
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.13
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
1.8Average goals (2nd half)0.25
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
60%Clean sheet after half-time88%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar
20%No goal after half-time88%
SimbaMtibwa Sugar

Simba - second-half results

80% W0% R20% P
11
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 80%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mtibwa Sugar - second-half results

13% W75% R13% P
6
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Simba - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.40
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Mtibwa Sugar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.60.4
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Simba
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
3
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Mtibwa Sugar
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
2
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.90
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
17%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
20%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Simba

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.86
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.74
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.68
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
204%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Mtibwa Sugar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.86
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
46%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

SimbaLigaMtibwa Sugar
Average goals in match 2.801.69 1.00
Both teams scored 20%25% 13%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 80%25% 13%
Clean sheets 60%46% 63%
Goal before half-time 60%41% 38%
Goal after half-time 100%52% 25%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.69
Average goals per match
25%
Both teams scored
25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
46%
Clean sheets
1.08
Home goals / match
0.61
Away goals / match
+77%
Home attack advantage
+44%
Home defence advantage
+27%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
41%
1 goal
16%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
52%
1 goal
17%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Elie Mpanzu Kibisawala⚽ 1
Shomari Salum KapombeA 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SimbaGoalElie Mpanzu KibisawalaAssist: Shomari Salum Kapombe

FAQ

What was the result of Simba vs Mtibwa Sugar?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Simba 1:1 Mtibwa Sugar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Simba vs Mtibwa Sugar?

Simba score 2.20 goals per game on average and Mtibwa Sugar 0.50. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 1.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 25% of games. Both teams score in 20% of Simba's matches and 13% of Mtibwa Sugar's.

What form are Simba and Mtibwa Sugar in?

Over the last 5 games Simba have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Mtibwa Sugar 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Simba vs Mtibwa Sugar?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.