Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraBenjamin Mkapa National StadiumData current as of 04 November 2026

Simba vs Namungo: match statistics

Simba crest
Simba
3 : 2half-time 1:2
Namungo crest
Namungo

Simba vs Namungo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Simba played Namungo in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 2 November 2026. Venue: Benjamin Mkapa National Stadium. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Simba: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Namungo: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Simba scores 2.22 and concedes 0.44 goals per match. Namungo scores 1.00 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.39 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Simba 44%, Namungo 40%. Over 2.5: Simba 44%, Namungo 40%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 41%.

xG, shots and style

Simba has higher xG: 1.70 vs 1.25. Simba: 9.7 shots per match, Namungo: 6.0.

Match halves

Simba: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 1.33. Namungo: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

Simba: 61-75 (8 goals). Namungo: 16-30 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.39 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 41%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Simba are top of the table and have won all 8 matches this season, while eighth-placed Namungo have 4 wins and 5 defeats. The hosts have also won their last 5 matches, whereas the visitors have lost 3 of their last 5 and all 4 away games so far. At home, Simba average 2.75 goals scored and 0.5 conceded, while Namungo average 0.75 goals scored and 2 conceded away from home. The hosts’ advantage is also reflected in the quality of chances: their home xG is 2.14, with just 0.70 xG conceded, while Namungo’s away xG is 1.35 and their opponents’ xG is 1.73. Simba average 8 shots on target per home match, compared with Namungo’s 3.75 away from home, further supporting a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal against both teams scoring is that Simba kept a clean sheet in 60% of their home matches, while Namungo failed to score in 50% of their away games. In their last 5 matches, Simba conceded an average of just 0.6 goals, while Namungo scored an average of 1.0, increasing the risk that the visitors will fail to find the net. The hosts, meanwhile, have good prospects of scoring: they netted 19 goals in their last 5 matches, while Namungo conceded 7 over that period. Although Namungo’s average xG is 1.35 and Simba conceded an average of 0.8 goals at home, the balance of evidence points to a result in which only one team scores—BTTS - No. This means at least one team is expected not to score; it does not automatically mean a 0-0 draw.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Simba have scored 19 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 3.8 per game, while their xG over this period was 2.26. Namungo have conceded an average of 1.4 goals recently and 2.0 goals per game in the matches included in the season statistics, increasing the hosts’ chances of scoring at least twice. The visitors average 0.75 goals and have failed to score in 50% of their matches, so I assess their contribution to the total more cautiously. Over 1.5 goals is the strongest signal: with a projected total of 2.7 goals, it is more likely than the other options under consideration, although the season league average of 2.46 goals tempers expectations for higher lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Simba led at the break in 3 of 5 home matches, while Namungo were trailing at half-time in 2 of 4 away games and did not lead in any of them. The hosts won 4 of 5 home matches, whereas the visitors lost all 4 away games, conceding an average of 2.0 goals per match. Simba’s form further strengthens this pick: they have won their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 3.8 goals, compared with Namungo’s 1.0. The visitors’ higher xG, 1.35 versus the hosts’ 1.11, along with Simba’s 40% rate of half-time draws, leaves a draw at the break followed by a home win as a notable alternative. However, the strongest single scenario is Simba leading at the break and holding on to that lead until full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

71Possession (%)29
SimbaNamungo
6Shots5
SimbaNamungo
2Shots on target2
SimbaNamungo
0.99xG0.59
SimbaNamungo
8Corners2
SimbaNamungo
64Dangerous attacks18
SimbaNamungo
0Fouls1
SimbaNamungo
0Cards0
SimbaNamungo

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.22Goals scored / match1
SimbaNamungo
0.44Goals conceded / match1.2
SimbaNamungo
60%Average possession37%
SimbaNamungo
4.78Shots on target / match2.6
SimbaNamungo

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.67Shots per match6
SimbaNamungo
4.78Shots on target2.6
SimbaNamungo
23%Shot conversion16.7%
SimbaNamungo
60%Possession37%
SimbaNamungo
1.7xG for1.25
SimbaNamungo
0.77xG against1.75
SimbaNamungo

Shooting quality

Simba: Efficient finishingNamungo: Counter-attacking
SimbaNamungo
Accuracy (shots on target)49%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.21
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Simba is 67% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - Simba · 1.8 pts / match - Namungo

Simba
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-0
Last 5 at home
4-0-0
WWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.83Opponent xG: 0.97BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Namungo
LLWWW
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-0-5
1.50 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-4
Last 5 away
0-0-4
LLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Simba is 122% better for: goals scored per match.

2.22 goals / match - Simba · 1 goals / match - Namungo

Simba is 173% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.44 goals / match - Simba · 1.2 goals / match - Namungo

Simba scoring profile: very strong

Simba scores in 100% of matches (9 of 9 matches), while Namungo keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 matches).

Namungo scoring profile: mixed

Namungo scores in 80% of matches (8 of 10 matches), while Simba keeps a clean sheet in 56% (5 of 9 matches).

20Goals scored (season)10
SimbaNamungo
4Goals conceded (season)12
SimbaNamungo
2.67Average goals in match2.2
SimbaNamungo
13Goals scored (last 5)4
SimbaNamungo
2Goals conceded (last 5)4
SimbaNamungo

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal80%
SimbaNamungo
78%2 goals20%
SimbaNamungo
11%3 goals0%
SimbaNamungo
11%4 goals0%
SimbaNamungo

How often they concede at least...

44%1 goal60%
SimbaNamungo
0%2 goals40%
SimbaNamungo
0%3 goals20%
SimbaNamungo
0%4 goals0%
SimbaNamungo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time20%
SimbaNamungo
0%BTTS in both halves10%
SimbaNamungo
44%Scored in both halves20%
SimbaNamungo

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
SimbaNamungo
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
SimbaNamungo
40%BTTS - last 520%
SimbaNamungo

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
SimbaNamungo
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
SimbaNamungo
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
SimbaNamungo

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
SimbaNamungo
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
SimbaNamungo
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time30%
SimbaNamungo

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Simba is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - Simba · 1.6 pts / match - Namungo

Simba - half-time state
56% leading33% draw11% trailing
Namungo - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.6
SimbaNamungo
0.89Goals scored (1st half)0.6
SimbaNamungo
0.22Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
SimbaNamungo
1.11Average goals (1st half)1
SimbaNamungo
78%Clean sheet before half-time60%
SimbaNamungo
33%No goal before half-time40%
SimbaNamungo

After half-time (2nd half)

2.44Points per match (2nd half)0.8
SimbaNamungo
1.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
SimbaNamungo
0.22Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
SimbaNamungo
1.56Average goals (2nd half)1.2
SimbaNamungo
78%Clean sheet after half-time60%
SimbaNamungo
22%No goal after half-time60%
SimbaNamungo

Simba - second-half results

78% W11% D11% L
18
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding179%

Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Namungo - second-half results

10% W50% D40% L
16
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding125%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Simba - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.60
Goals scored / match0.81.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3+8
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Namungo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.20.4
1 goal100%40%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Simba
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
4
0
31-45
4
0
46-60
8
2
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Namungo
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
4
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
3
46-60
0
3
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.43
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+44%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
80%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Simba

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.93
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.85
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
152%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
47%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Namungo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

SimbaLigaNamungo
Average goals in match▲ 2.672.39▼ 2.20
Both teams scored▼ 44%48%▼ 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 44%41%• 40%
Clean sheets▲ 56%29%▲ 40%
Goal before half-time▲ 78%73%▲ 80%
Goal after half-time▲ 89%68%▼ 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.39
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
0.93
Away goals / match
+57%
Home attack advantage
+36%
Home defence advantage
+28%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Away team

Substitutes

51Abdulkarim Kassim Kiswanyaon 1'

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Simba 2 - 0 - 0 Namungo. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Namungo
1 : 3
Simba
Simba
3 : 0
Namungo

FAQ

What was the result of Simba vs Namungo?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Simba 3:2 Namungo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Simba and Namungo?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Simba won 2, Namungo won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Simba vs Namungo?

Simba score 2.22 goals per game on average and Namungo 1.00. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.39 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Simba's matches and 40% of Namungo's.

What form are Simba and Namungo in?

Over the last 5 games Simba have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Namungo 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Simba vs Namungo?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Simba vs Namungo: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.