Simba vs Tanzania Prisons: match statistics
Simba vs Tanzania Prisons: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Simba played Tanzania Prisons in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 4:0.
Current form
Simba: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Tanzania Prisons: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Simba scores 1.65 and concedes 0.45 goals per match. Tanzania Prisons scores 0.52 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.03 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Simba 30%, Tanzania Prisons 29%. Over 2.5: Simba 45%, Tanzania Prisons 33%. League level: BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 37%.
xG, shots and style
Simba has higher xG: 1.54 vs 0.97. Simba: 8.0 shots per match, Tanzania Prisons: 3.8.
Match halves
Simba: half-time lead 55%, second-half goals 0.70. Tanzania Prisons: half-time lead 5%, second-half goals 0.24.
Goals by minute
Simba: 31-45+ (7 goals). Tanzania Prisons: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 37%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Simba is the clear favorite: at home they win 70% of matches, have a season record of 12 wins, 7 draws and 1 loss, scored 33 goals and conceded 9, and in home fixtures average 2 goals scored and 0.5 conceded per match (xG for 1.66 vs xG against 0.81). Tanzania Prisons sit 15th and win only 11% of away games, average 0.44 goals per away match and fail to score in 67% of trips; in their last 5 matches the visitors conceded 11 goals and did not record a win. The quality gap in chance creation is evident: Simba register 4.67 shots on target per home match with a conversion rate of 19%, while the visitors have 3.33 shots on target and a 5% conversion, translating into a clear efficiency advantage. Additionally, the hosts keep clean sheets in 70% of home games and average 2.2 points per match over their last 5 outings, whereas Tanzania average only 0.2 points per match in that period; therefore I forecast a home victory and a low probability of an away upset.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistical analysis favors the "no" outcome at 70% vs 30% for "yes". Seasonal BTTS rates are low: Simba 33% and Tanzania Prisons 22%, against a league average of 34%, indicating below-average propensity for both teams to score. Simba keep a clean sheet in 42% of home matches and over the last 5 games averaged 1.8 goals scored and 0.6 conceded, while Tanzania over their last 5 averaged 0.6 goals scored and 2.2 conceded (3 scored and 11 conceded in 5 matches). Although Tanzania register many shots (9.33) and 3.33 on target per match, their conversion rate is only 5% and the visitors' recent xG is 0.82 versus Simba's 1.48 xG in the last five, which reduces realistic chances of an away goal. Given the higher clean sheet rate for the home side (42%) and the low efficiency and goal average of the visitors, the "no" scenario is the strongest signal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I calculated expected goals by combining season xG and xG from the last 5 matches: for Simba (0.78 season + 1.48 last 5) against Prisons’ defense (1.44 season + 1.75 last 5) this yields about 1.36 goals for Simba; for Prisons (1.36 season + 0.82 last 5) vs Simba’s defense (1.17 season + 1.3 last 5) this yields about 1.17 goals for Prisons; total = 2.53. Match data confirm a moderate number of chances — Simba averages 2.9 shots and 1.0 on target per match with a 21% conversion, Prisons averages 9.33 shots and 3.33 on target but only a 5% conversion, which limits goals from Prisons’ high shot volume. Form trend favors Simba: in the last 5 matches Simba scored 1.8 goals on average (9 in 5), Prisons 0.6 (3 in 5) and conceded 11 in that period, thus increasing the likelihood of Simba scoring. Over/Under stats are mixed — seasonally Over 2.5 occurs in 42% of Simba’s matches and 22% of Prisons’, but in the last 5 matches Over 2.5 occurred in 60% of Simba’s games and 80% of Prisons’, which pushes the probability for Over 2.5 to ~56%. Given the expected 2.53 goals, the stronger and preferred play is Over 1.5 (recommendation): Over 1.5 ~84% probability, Over 2.5 ~56%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Simba has a 60% win rate in the last 5 matches (3 of 5) and led at the break in 60% of those games (3 of 5), with an average of 1.0 first-half goals, which strongly supports the home side leading after 45 minutes. Tanzania Prisons have not won any of their last 5 matches (0% wins) and score an average of 0.6 goals in that run while conceding 2.2 goals on average, indicating poor defensive form. The visitors generate more opportunities (xG 1.36 and 9.33 shots per match) than Simba (xG 0.78 and 2.9 shots), but have low finishing efficiency (conversion 5% versus 21% for Simba), so their advantage in chances rarely translates into goals. Considering Simba’s 60% rate of leading at the break, their 60% win rate in the last 5, and the visitors’ worse form (0% wins and 2.2 conceded per match over 5 games), the strongest signal is the 1/1 scenario (Simba leads at half-time and wins at full-time).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Simba | Tanzania Prisons | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.25 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.48 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Simba is 1000% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Simba · 0.2 pts / match - Tanzania Prisons
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Simba is 217% better for: goals scored per match.
1.65 goals / match - Simba · 0.52 goals / match - Tanzania Prisons
Simba is 187% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.45 goals / match - Simba · 1.29 goals / match - Tanzania Prisons
Simba scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while Tanzania Prisons keeps a clean sheet in 29% (6 of 21 matches).
Tanzania Prisons scores in 38% of matches (8 of 21 matches), while Simba keeps a clean sheet in 65% (13 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Simba
Over / Under - Tanzania Prisons
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Simba is 159% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.1 pts / match - Simba · 0.81 pts / match - Tanzania Prisons
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Simba - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 55% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Tanzania Prisons - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 5% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Simba
Tanzania Prisons
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Simba | Liga | Tanzania Prisons | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.10 | 2.03 | ▼ 1.81 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 30% | 33% | ▼ 29% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 45% | 37% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 65% | 42% | ▼ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 65% | 55% | ▼ 52% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 65% | 60% | ▼ 52% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- SimbaGoalMorice Michael Abraham
- SimbaGoalCletous Chama
- SimbaGoalSuleiman Mwalim Mussa
- SimbaGoalIsmau00ebl Olivier Toure
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Simba 1 - 0 - 0 Tanzania Prisons. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Simba vs Tanzania Prisons?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Simba 4:0 Tanzania Prisons. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Simba vs Tanzania Prisons?
Simba score 1.65 goals per game on average and Tanzania Prisons 0.52. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Simba's matches and 29% of Tanzania Prisons's.
What form are Simba and Tanzania Prisons in?
Over the last 5 games Simba have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Tanzania Prisons 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Simba vs Tanzania Prisons?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


