Switzerland - Super LeagueStade de TourbillonData current as of 07 September 2026

Sion vs Thun: match statistics

Sion crest
Sion
3 : 2half-time 1:1
Thun crest
Thun

Sion vs Thun: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sion played Thun in Super League (Switzerland). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Venue: Stade de Tourbillon. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Sion: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Thun: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sion scores 2.20 and concedes 1.80 goals per match. Thun scores 1.80 and concedes 2.80. League average: 3.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sion 80%, Thun 60%. Over 2.5: Sion 100%, Thun 80%. League level: BTTS 73%, Over 2.5 76%.

xG, shots and style

Sion has higher xG: 2.04 vs 1.56. Sion: 18.6 shots per match, Thun: 14.6.

Match halves

Sion: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.60. Thun: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.40.

Goals by minute

Sion: 76-90+ (5 goals). Thun: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League: 3.78 goals per match, BTTS 73%, Over 2.5 76%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-3. Average goals 1.75, BTTS 25%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Sion have a clear edge in chance creation at home, averaging 18.33 shots and an xG of 2.09, while Thun record 13.67 shots and an xG of 1.46 away from home. The hosts score 2.33 goals per home game, but Thun’s defensive weakness on the road is particularly significant: they concede as many as 2.67 goals per match, with an xGA of 2.02, and have yet to keep a clean sheet. The visitors are effective in attack, averaging 3 goals away from home and converting 22% of their shots, so they have strong arguments to find the net. Sion also control possession more often at home, averaging 57% compared with Thun’s 43%, and have won 67% of their home matches. Both teams have scored 14 goals in their last five matches, but Sion’s superior chance quality and the visitors’ highly vulnerable defence slightly favour a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - Yes pick is strongly supported by both teams’ very high scoring rates in their last five matches: Sion and Thun have averaged 2.8 goals scored each, while conceding 2.6 and 3.0 goals respectively. Sion recorded BTTS in 100% of their last five matches, compared with 60% for Thun, and neither team has kept a clean sheet in the current season data. The hosts have created chances worth an average of 1.61 xG in their latest run, while Thun’s defence allows opponents an average of 1.96 xG, clearly increasing the likelihood of a Sion goal despite weaker data from the short home sample. Thun are even more convincing in away attack, averaging 3.0 goals and 4.67 shots on target per match, while Sion concede an average of 6.0 goals at home. An additional argument is the league BTTS frequency of 79% and an average of 4.11 goals per match, both favouring an open scenario with goals at both ends.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last five matches, Sion averaged 2.8 goals scored and 2.6 conceded, while Thun’s figures over the same period were 2.8 goals scored and 3.0 conceded per game. Both teams recorded 100% of matches with at least three goals across these five appearances, while the league average stands at a very high 4.11 goals. The xG profile also supports an attacking outlook: Sion produces an average of 1.15 xG at home, compared with 2.02 xG conceded by Thun away from home, while Thun generates 1.46 xG against as much as 2.69 xG allowed by Sion. The visitors average 3.0 goals scored away from home, while the hosts concede 6.0 there, meaning that even a one-sided contribution from Thun should significantly move the match towards two goals. The strongest selection is Over 1.5 goals, as the form data, chance quality and Sion’s very weak defence clearly reduce the risk of a 0:0 or 1:0 result.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Thun have a clear edge in terms of taking the lead before half-time: over their last five matches, they have averaged 1.6 goals in the first half, compared with 0.8 for Sion, while the visitors were ahead at the break in 60% of those games. Sion were trailing at half-time in 60% of their recent matches, and in the current home data they have yet to score before the break while conceding an average of 3.0 goals. Thun’s advantage is also evident in chance creation, as they average 13.67 shots and 4.67 shots on target per match, compared with 10.0 and 3.0 respectively for the hosts. After the interval, Sion can be more dangerous, having recently averaged 2.0 goals, but their defence still concedes 1.6 goals, while Thun have averaged 2.33 goals in second halves across the season. The most likely scenario, therefore, is that the visitors will establish a lead at the break and hold on to it until the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
SionThun
14Shots15
SionThun
6Shots on target4
SionThun
1.67xG1.76
SionThun
11Corners4
SionThun
50Dangerous attacks74
SionThun
9Fouls15
SionThun
3Cards2
SionThun

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.2Goals scored / match1.8
SionThun
1.8Goals conceded / match2.8
SionThun
56%Average possession45%
SionThun
6Shots on target / match4.4
SionThun

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

18.6Shots per match14.6
SionThun
6Shots on target4.4
SionThun
11.8%Shot conversion12.3%
SionThun
56%Possession45%
SionThun
2.04xG for1.56
SionThun
1.41xG against1.95
SionThun

Shooting quality

Sion: DominantThun: Counter-attacking
SionThun
Accuracy (shots on target)32%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sion is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Sion · 1.4 pts / match - Thun

Sion
LWWLW
Season result split
60% W0% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
WWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 2.04Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Thun
WLLWD
Season result split
40% W20% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 away
2-0-1
WLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.95BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sion is 22% better for: goals scored per match.

2.2 goals / match - Sion · 1.8 goals / match - Thun

Sion is 56% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.8 goals / match - Sion · 2.8 goals / match - Thun

Sion scoring profile: very strong

Sion scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Thun keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

Thun scoring profile: strong

Thun scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Sion keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

11Goals scored (season)9
SionThun
9Goals conceded (season)14
SionThun
4Average goals in match4.6
SionThun
11Goals scored (last 5)9
SionThun
9Goals conceded (last 5)14
SionThun

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal60%
SionThun
80%2 goals60%
SionThun
40%3 goals40%
SionThun
0%4 goals20%
SionThun

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal80%
SionThun
60%2 goals60%
SionThun
20%3 goals60%
SionThun
20%4 goals40%
SionThun

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time20%
SionThun
20%BTTS in both halves0%
SionThun
60%Scored in both halves40%
SionThun

BTTS and goal count

80%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
SionThun
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
SionThun
80%BTTS - last 560%
SionThun

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
SionThun
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time60%
SionThun
40%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
SionThun

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
SionThun
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time80%
SionThun
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time60%
SionThun

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Thun is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.6 pts / match - Sion · 1 pts / match - Thun

Sion - half-time state
20% leading0% draw80% trailing
Thun - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.6Points per match (1st half)1
SionThun
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.4
SionThun
1.2Goals conceded (1st half)1.2
SionThun
1.8Average goals (1st half)1.6
SionThun
20%Clean sheet before half-time40%
SionThun
40%No goal before half-time60%
SionThun

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)1.2
SionThun
1.6Goals scored (2nd half)1.4
SionThun
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)1.6
SionThun
2.2Average goals (2nd half)3
SionThun
60%Clean sheet after half-time40%
SionThun
0%No goal after half-time40%
SionThun

Sion - second-half results

60% W20% R20% P
3
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.6

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Thun - second-half results

20% W60% R20% P
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sion - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.00
Goals scored / match0.61.6
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match1.82.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference-3+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Thun - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match1.21.6
Average goals in match1.63.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sion
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
3
31-45
2
0
46-60
1
2
61-75
5
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Thun
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
4
3
46-60
1
3
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.30
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.5 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-59%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sion

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.63
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
45% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
45%

Thun

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.61
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.85
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

SionLigaThun
Average goals in match 4.003.78 4.60
Both teams scored 80%73% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%76% 80%
Clean sheets 20%15% 20%
Goal before half-time 100%78% 80%
Goal after half-time 100%92% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.78
Average goals per match
73%
Both teams scored
76%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
15%
Clean sheets
1.97
Home goals / match
1.81
Away goals / match
+9%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
8%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
92%
1 goal
68%
2 goals
43%
3 goals
19%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ThunGoalJan BamertAssist: Fabio Fehr
  2. SionYellow cardFodé Sylla
  3. SionGoalNoé SowAssist: Donat Rrudhani
  4. SionYellow cardFodé Sylla
  5. SionYellow cardFranck William Surdez
  6. ThunGoalFabio FehrAssist: Furkan Dursun
  7. ThunYellow cardJustin Roth
  8. ThunSubstitutionOn: Noah ChristofferssonOff: Furkan Dursun
  9. SionSubstitutionOn: Nias HeftiOff: Marcos Robson Cipriano
  10. ThunYellow cardMarco Bürki

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Sion 1 - 0 - 3 Thun. Average goals 1.75, both teams scored in 25% matches.

FC Sion
2 : 0
FC Thun
FC Thun
1 : 0
FC Sion
FC Thun
2 : 1
FC Sion
FC Sion
0 : 1
FC Thun

FAQ

What was the result of Sion vs Thun?

The Super League match finished Sion 3:2 Thun. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Sion and Thun?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Sion won 1, Thun won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Sion vs Thun?

Sion score 2.20 goals per game on average and Thun 1.80. The Super League average is 3.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 76% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Sion's matches and 60% of Thun's.

What form are Sion and Thun in?

Over the last 5 games Sion have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Thun 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sion vs Thun?

The statistical background for Sion vs Thun — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.