Siracusa vs Atalanta II: match statistics
Siracusa vs Atalanta II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Siracusa played Atalanta II in Serie C Group C (Italy). The match was played on 4 April 2026. Final score: 3:3.
Current form
Siracusa: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Atalanta II: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Siracusa scores 1.21 and concedes 1.47 goals per match. Atalanta II scores 1.36 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.48 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Siracusa 59%, Atalanta II 52%. Over 2.5: Siracusa 56%, Atalanta II 39%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
Atalanta II has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.48. Siracusa: 12.2 shots per match, Atalanta II: 12.9.
Match halves
Siracusa: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.74. Atalanta II: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Siracusa: 76-90+ (11 goals). Atalanta II: 16-30 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie C Group C: 2.48 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1) because Siracusa’s home metrics are superior. Siracusa scores 1.71 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.73 and a positive home goal difference (+8), while Atalanta II averages only 0.94 goals away with xG 1.52 and a negative away goal difference (-4). The hosts register more shots (14.06 vs 12.82) and more on-target shots (5.41 vs 4.35), and their conversion rate is 12% versus 7% for the visitors, indicating greater attacking efficiency. Defensively the differences are marginal (they concede 1.24 vs 1.18), but Atalanta have a higher away xG against (1.46 vs 1.13), suggesting the visitors allow better-quality chances. Considering the advantage in shot volume, conversion and superior xG for the hosts, I assess probabilities at 60% for Siracusa, 25% for a draw and 15% for Atalanta II.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics favor BTTS: Siracusa has a seasonal BTTS rate of 63% and 80% in the last 5 matches, indicating a strong home tendency for Goal/Goal. Atalanta II posts a seasonal BTTS of 41% and 60% in the last 5 matches; across those five matches they concede on average 1.6 goals versus 1.2 conceded by Siracusa, so both teams have recently been regularly allowing opponents to score. Both teams produce similar xG: seasonal xG 1.59 (Siracusa) vs 1.52 (Atalanta II) and recent xG 1.57 vs 1.46, and with low clean sheet rates of 19% and 18% the risk of goals from both sides increases. Additionally, Siracusa has a higher shot accuracy 14% versus 7% for Atalanta and averages more shots on target (5.5 vs 4.35), supporting their ability to score, while Atalanta has scored 45 goals this season and also creates chances. Based on this I assess BTTS probability at 75% for 'yes' and 25% for 'no' and recommend 'yes' as the strongest signal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I base expected goals on xG: Siracusa has xG_for 1.59, Atalanta II’s defense concedes xG_against 1.46 => expected ~1.53 goals for the home side; Atalanta II has xG_for 1.52, while Siracusa’s defense concedes xG_against 1.30 => expected ~1.41 goals for the away side, total = 2.94. With a mean of 2.94, a Poisson distribution gives about a 79% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), which is supported by season rates: Siracusa has 75% of matches over 1.5, Atalanta II 59%. For the 2.5 line the model indicates ~56% probability of at least 3 goals; this correlates with Siracusa having 56% of matches Over 2.5 seasonally, while Atalanta II only 24%, so the impetus for Over 2.5 mainly comes from the home side. The 3.5 line looks weaker (approx. 34% for Over), and additional data support the home advantage: Siracusa averages 13.0 shots and 5.5 on target with 14% conversion, Atalanta II averages 12.82 shots and 4.35 on target with 7% conversion. Considering the above, the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (~79%) with an expected scoreline 1.53–1.41 (total 2.94).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Siracusa led at the break in 38% of their matches, the halftime score was a draw in 50% of games, and Atalanta II led only in 13% (leadingAtHTPercentage_home 38, drawingAtHTPercentage_home 50, trailingAtHT_home 13). At halftime the home side average 0.94 goals versus 0.47 for the visitors, they register slightly higher xG (1.59 vs 1.52) and a superior shot conversion rate (14% versus 7%), giving them an advantage in converting chances. Siracusa scored 8 goals in minutes 76–90 compared to 2 for Atalanta II and have higher average second-half goals (scored_2hg_avg_home 0.88 vs 0.47), so draws at halftime often turn into wins for the home team in the closing minutes. On this basis I rate the halftime draw / home win scenario highest (X/1 26%), followed by home/home (1/1 18%) and draw/draw (X/X 16%); overall I forecast a 50% probability of a halftime draw and a 44% probability that the home side will win after 90 minutes.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Siracusa | Atalanta II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Atalanta II is 12% better for: goals scored per match.
1.21 goals / match - Siracusa · 1.36 goals / match - Atalanta II
Atalanta II is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.47 goals / match - Siracusa · 1.33 goals / match - Atalanta II
Siracusa scores in 65% of matches (22 of 34 matches), while Atalanta II keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 33 matches).
Atalanta II scores in 64% of matches (21 of 33 matches), while Siracusa keeps a clean sheet in 6% (2 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Siracusa
Over / Under - Atalanta II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Atalanta II is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.06 pts / match - Siracusa · 1.36 pts / match - Atalanta II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Siracusa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Atalanta II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Siracusa
Atalanta II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).
Teams vs league
| Siracusa | Liga | Atalanta II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.68 | 2.48 | ▲ 2.70 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 59% | 50% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 47% | ▼ 39% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 6% | 29% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 68% | 66% | • 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 78% | • 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Other recorded players
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- SiracusaGoalSebastiano Di Paolo Vlad
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Siracusa 0 - 0 - 1 Atalanta II. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Siracusa vs Atalanta II?
The Serie C Group C match finished Siracusa 3:3 Atalanta II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Siracusa vs Atalanta II?
Siracusa score 1.21 goals per game on average and Atalanta II 1.36. The Serie C Group C average is 2.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Siracusa's matches and 52% of Atalanta II's.
What form are Siracusa and Atalanta II in?
Over the last 5 games Siracusa have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Atalanta II 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Siracusa vs Atalanta II?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Siracusa vs Atalanta II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


