Sivasspor vs 76 Iğdır Belediyespor: match statistics
Sivasspor vs 76 Iğdır Belediyespor: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Sivasspor played 76 Iğdır Belediyespor in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match was played on 26 April 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Sivasspor: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. 76 Iğdır Belediyespor: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Sivasspor scores 1.25 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. 76 Iğdır Belediyespor scores 1.33 and concedes 1.36. League average: 2.92 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sivasspor 53%, 76 Iğdır Belediyespor 61%. Over 2.5: Sivasspor 42%, 76 Iğdır Belediyespor 50%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
76 Iğdır Belediyespor has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.31. Sivasspor: 11.5 shots per match, 76 Iğdır Belediyespor: 11.7.
Match halves
Sivasspor: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.58. 76 Iğdır Belediyespor: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.69.
Goals by minute
Sivasspor: 76-90+ (11 goals). 76 Iğdır Belediyespor: 0-15 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Lig: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sivasspor holds an advantage in chance creation and quality — average home xG is 1.43 versus 1.24 xG for opponents in away matches, and the hosts average 12.83 shots per game compared to 10.28 for visitors. Defensively the hosts also perform better: at home they concede 1.06 goals per game and keep 39% clean sheets, while 76 Iğdır concede 1.5 goals on the road and have only a 17% clean sheet rate. Recent form over the last five matches gives a slight edge to Sivasspor (2 wins, 3 losses, 1.2 pts/game) over the visitors (1 win, 1 draw, 3 losses, 0.8 pts/game), although the hosts have conceded 10 and scored 6 in those five games, while the visitors have scored 8 and conceded 7. The visitors are, however, more efficient in finishing (14% conversion vs 11% for the hosts) and have scored 48 goals this season versus Sivasspor’s 45, with higher possession (54% vs 52%), which gives them a real chance to score. Considering the higher xG, greater shot volume and positive home goal differential for the hosts (+7 at home), I predict a Sivasspor win, although I expect a tight match.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistical analysis indicates a scenario favoring BTTS - Yes: the home side has BTTS at 67% this season and the away side 56%, averaging ~61%. In the last 5 matches BTTS was 80% for the home team and 60% for the visitors; home conceded 2.0 goals per game and away 1.4 in that span, increasing the likelihood of both teams scoring. xG data shows the home team produces 1.55 xG versus 1.24 xG for the guests, while allowed xG are 1.07 (home) and 1.32 (away), meaning both teams both create and concede scoring opportunities. Additionally, both teams have only 17% clean sheets this season, making a No Goal outcome for one side unlikely; therefore I recommend BTTS = Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Calculated xG and opponent defenses yield an expected 1.44 goals for Sivasspor (attacking xG 1.55 vs opponent defense 1.32) and 1.16 for 76 Iğdır (attacking xG 1.24 vs opponent defense 1.07), totaling 2.60 expected goals. Season-long stats show Over 1.5 goals in 78% of Sivasspor’s matches and 83% of 76 Iğdır’s matches, averaging about 81%, which is a strong signal for Over 1.5. Additionally both teams record BTTS: 67% (Sivasspor) and 56% (Iğdır), average 62%, increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. Sivasspor averages 13.11 shots with 4.44 on target, Iğdır 10.28 with 4.06 on target, and conversion rates are 10% and 14%, suggesting efficient use of created chances. As a result the strongest and most justified market is Over 1.5 (pick: Over at the 1.5 line); Over 2.5 looks moderately likely (~55%), while Over 3.5 remains less probable (~23%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1), because historically both teams were level at the break in 50% of matches. The away side have a higher average of first-half goals (0.83 versus the home side’s 0.44) and scored 27 goals before the break this season compared to the home team’s 16, but the home team generate higher xG (1.55 xG versus 1.24 xG for the visitors), which suggests better quality chances. After the break the home team average 0.83 goals and collect 1.61 points in second halves, winning the second half in 44% of matches versus 22% for the visitors, increasing the likelihood of a turnaround. In the last 5 matches the hosts led at the break in 40% of cases and averaged 1.0 first-half goals versus 0.6 for the visitors, confirming an improvement in the hosts’ short-term form. Considering the 50% share of half-time draws and the home side’s strength after the break, X/1 appears the strongest scenario, although X/X and 2/2 remain possible.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sivasspor | 76 Iğdır Belediyespor | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Sivasspor is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Sivasspor · 0.8 pts / match - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
76 Iğdır Belediyespor is 6% better for: goals scored per match.
1.25 goals / match - Sivasspor · 1.33 goals / match - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor
Sivasspor is 19% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.14 goals / match - Sivasspor · 1.36 goals / match - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor
Sivasspor scores in 75% of matches (27 of 36 matches), while 76 Iğdır Belediyespor keeps a clean sheet in 17% (6 of 36 matches).
76 Iğdır Belediyespor scores in 69% of matches (25 of 36 matches), while Sivasspor keeps a clean sheet in 33% (12 of 36 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sivasspor
Over / Under - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sivasspor is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.42 pts / match - Sivasspor · 1.25 pts / match - 76 Iğdır Belediyespor
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sivasspor - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
76 Iğdır Belediyespor - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Sivasspor
76 Iğdır Belediyespor
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).
Teams vs league
| Sivasspor | Liga | 76 Iğdır Belediyespor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.39 | 2.92 | ▼ 2.69 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 50% | ▲ 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 42% | 54% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 29% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 71% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 80% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Sivasspor 0 - 1 - 0 76 Iğdır Belediyespor. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Sivasspor vs 76 Iğdır Belediyespor?
The 1. Lig match finished Sivasspor 2:1 76 Iğdır Belediyespor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Sivasspor vs 76 Iğdır Belediyespor?
Sivasspor score 1.25 goals per game on average and 76 Iğdır Belediyespor 1.33. The 1. Lig average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Sivasspor's matches and 61% of 76 Iğdır Belediyespor's.
What form are Sivasspor and 76 Iğdır Belediyespor in?
Over the last 5 games Sivasspor have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and 76 Iğdır Belediyespor 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sivasspor vs 76 Iğdır Belediyespor?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


