Türkiye - 1. LigData current as of 12 September 2026

Sivasspor vs Amed: match statistics

Sivasspor crest
Sivasspor
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Amed crest
Amed
135%(3.20)
X30%(3.20)
235%(2.10)

The match promises to be extremely tight. Sivasspor presents solid home form with 50% wins and an impressive goal difference of +8 at their own stadium, having earned 1.6 points per match in the last 5 games. Amed, as the league leader (1st place), possesses better offensive statistics (43 goals in the season), yet their away form raises doubts – only 40% wins away and as many as 50% losses, with a negative streak in recent away matches. A key factor is Sivasspor's advantage in ball possession (55% vs 53%) and home defense (50% clean sheets, averaging 0.7 goals conceded). Given the hosts' solidity at home and Amed's issues on the road, a draw seems most likely, though both teams have real chances for victory.

Sivasspor vs Amed: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sivasspor played Amed in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match was played on 25 January 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Sivasspor: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Amed: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sivasspor scores 1.24 and concedes 1.05 goals per match. Amed scores 2.05 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.92 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sivasspor 48%, Amed 57%. Over 2.5: Sivasspor 38%, Amed 71%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Amed has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.26. Sivasspor: 10.9 shots per match, Amed: 15.1.

Match halves

Sivasspor: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.76. Amed: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.10.

Goals by minute

Sivasspor: 76-90+ (8 goals). Amed: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Lig: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The match promises to be extremely tight. Sivasspor presents solid home form with 50% wins and an impressive goal difference of +8 at their own stadium, having earned 1.6 points per match in the last 5 games. Amed, as the league leader (1st place), possesses better offensive statistics (43 goals in the season), yet their away form raises doubts – only 40% wins away and as many as 50% losses, with a negative streak in recent away matches. A key factor is Sivasspor's advantage in ball possession (55% vs 53%) and home defense (50% clean sheets, averaging 0.7 goals conceded). Given the hosts' solidity at home and Amed's issues on the road, a draw seems most likely, though both teams have real chances for victory.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
SivassporAmed
13Shots10
SivassporAmed
3Shots on target3
SivassporAmed
1.2xG1.28
SivassporAmed
1Corners7
SivassporAmed
23Dangerous attacks59
SivassporAmed
10Fouls10
SivassporAmed
1Cards3
SivassporAmed

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.24Goals scored / match2.05
SivassporAmed
1.05Goals conceded / match1.29
SivassporAmed
51%Average possession52%
SivassporAmed
3.57Shots on target / match5.67
SivassporAmed

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.95Shots per match15.1
SivassporAmed
3.57Shots on target5.67
SivassporAmed
11.3%Shot conversion13.6%
SivassporAmed
51%Possession52%
SivassporAmed
1.26xG for1.66
SivassporAmed
1.25xG against1.18
SivassporAmed

Shooting quality

Sivasspor: BalancedAmed: Attacking
SivassporAmed
Accuracy (shots on target)33%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Amed is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Sivasspor · 2 pts / match - Amed

Sivasspor
DDWLW
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-7-7
1.33 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.11Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Amed
WDWWL
Season result split
62% W14% D24% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-3-5
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Amed is 65% better for: goals scored per match.

1.24 goals / match - Sivasspor · 2.05 goals / match - Amed

Sivasspor is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.05 goals / match - Sivasspor · 1.29 goals / match - Amed

Sivasspor scoring profile: strong

Sivasspor scores in 71% of matches (15 of 21 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 29% (6 of 21 matches).

Amed scoring profile: strong

Amed scores in 76% of matches (16 of 21 matches), while Sivasspor keeps a clean sheet in 38% (8 of 21 matches).

26Goals scored (season)43
SivassporAmed
22Goals conceded (season)27
SivassporAmed
2.29Average goals in match3.33
SivassporAmed
6Goals scored (last 5)6
SivassporAmed
5Goals conceded (last 5)3
SivassporAmed

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal76%
SivassporAmed
29%2 goals62%
SivassporAmed
14%3 goals29%
SivassporAmed
5%4 goals19%
SivassporAmed

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal71%
SivassporAmed
33%2 goals38%
SivassporAmed
5%3 goals14%
SivassporAmed
5%4 goals5%
SivassporAmed

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time33%
SivassporAmed
5%BTTS in both halves10%
SivassporAmed
14%Scored in both halves38%
SivassporAmed

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
SivassporAmed
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
SivassporAmed
60%BTTS - last 520%
SivassporAmed

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
SivassporAmed
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
SivassporAmed
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
SivassporAmed

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
SivassporAmed
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
SivassporAmed
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
SivassporAmed

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Amed is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.14 pts / match - Sivasspor · 1.71 pts / match - Amed

Sivasspor - half-time state
19% leading57% draw24% trailing
Amed - half-time state
43% leading43% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.14Points per match (1st half)1.71
SivassporAmed
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.95
SivassporAmed
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
SivassporAmed
0.71Average goals (1st half)1.52
SivassporAmed
62%Clean sheet before half-time57%
SivassporAmed
67%No goal before half-time38%
SivassporAmed

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1.52
SivassporAmed
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)1.1
SivassporAmed
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
SivassporAmed
1.43Average goals (2nd half)1.81
SivassporAmed
62%Clean sheet after half-time52%
SivassporAmed
52%No goal after half-time48%
SivassporAmed

Sivasspor - second-half results

33% W33% D33% L
24
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Amed - second-half results

38% W38% D24% L
36
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding144%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sivasspor - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Amed - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+4-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sivasspor
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
3
4
31-45
1
6
46-60
7
3
61-75
8
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Amed
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
5
4
16-30
10
7
31-45
6
1
46-60
5
6
61-75
12
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.81
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+114%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sivasspor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Amed

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
161%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).

Teams vs league

SivassporLigaAmed
Average goals in match 2.292.92 3.33
Both teams scored 48%53% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%56% 71%
Clean sheets 38%27% 29%
Goal before half-time 57%72% 71%
Goal after half-time 67%81% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.92
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.65
Home goals / match
1.27
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SivassporGoalValon EthemiAssist: Aly Malle
  2. AmedYellow cardMehmet Yeşil
  3. AmedYellow cardCelal Hanalp
  4. AmedGoalMbaye DiagneAssist: Dia Sabi'A
  5. SivassporYellow cardValon Ethemi
  6. AmedSubstitutionOn: Felix Ohene Afena-GyanOff: Florent Hasani
  7. AmedSubstitutionOn: Sinan KurtOff: André Biyogo Poko
  8. AmedYellow cardErce Kardeşler
  9. AmedSubstitutionOn: Çekdar OrhanOff: Dia Sabi'A

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Sivasspor 0 - 0 - 1 Amed. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Amed Sportif Faaliyetler Kulübü
4 : 2
Sivasspor

FAQ

What was the result of Sivasspor vs Amed?

The 1. Lig match finished Sivasspor 1:1 Amed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Sivasspor vs Amed?

Sivasspor score 1.24 goals per game on average and Amed 2.05. The 1. Lig average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Sivasspor's matches and 57% of Amed's.

What form are Sivasspor and Amed in?

Over the last 5 games Sivasspor have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Amed 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sivasspor vs Amed?

The statistical background for Sivasspor vs Amed — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.