United States - MLSPayPal ParkData current as of 30 August 2026

SJ Earthquakes vs Minnesota United: match statistics

SJ Earthquakes vs Minnesota United: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

SJ Earthquakes played Minnesota United in MLS (United States). The match was played on 23 August 2026. Venue: PayPal Park. Final score: 1:5.

Current form

SJ Earthquakes: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Minnesota United: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

SJ Earthquakes scores 1.90 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Minnesota United scores 1.10 and concedes 1.40. League average: 3.19 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: SJ Earthquakes 60%, Minnesota United 60%. Over 2.5: SJ Earthquakes 60%, Minnesota United 50%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

SJ Earthquakes has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.50. SJ Earthquakes: 14.1 shots per match, Minnesota United: 13.3.

Match halves

SJ Earthquakes: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.05. Minnesota United: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.70.

Goals by minute

SJ Earthquakes: 46-60 (9 goals). Minnesota United: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.19 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

SJ Earthquakes possess a clear attacking edge at home: they average 1.8 goals and create chances worth 1.91 xG, while Minnesota United allow opponents 1.66 xG away from home and concede 2 goals per match. The hosts also record significantly more shots, averaging 17.4 compared with 12.3, including 6.7 shots on target versus 5.2 for the visitors. However, Minnesota arrive in more stable recent defensive form, having conceded just 5 goals in their last 5 matches, compared with 13 for San Jose. The visitors have drawn 3 of their last 5 games, increasing the risk of a closely contested match, but their away goal difference stands at -6, and they keep a clean sheet in only 10% of such fixtures. The superior quality of chances created and home advantage give San Jose a slightly higher probability of victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The case for BTTS - Yes is primarily supported by current form: in their last 5 matches, both teams recorded this outcome in 80% of games. San Jose scored an average of 1.4 goals during this period but conceded as many as 2.6, creating highly favorable conditions for Minnesota’s attack. Minnesota averages 5.2 shots on target per match, with an xG of 1.46, while the hosts allow opponents an xG of 1.23. The hosts do have a modest season average of just 0.78 goals scored and kept a clean sheet in 44% of matches, but the visitors’ defense has recorded only 10% clean sheets and concedes an average of 2.0 goals away from home. San Jose’s season BTTS rate is only 33%, but the combination of the current run, Minnesota’s high BTTS rate of 80%, and the league average of 62% gives the “yes” option a slight but clear edge.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Minnesota averages 1.40 goals scored and as many as 2.00 goals conceded in away matches, with 90% of their games finishing above the 1.5-goal line. At home, the hosts create chances worth an average of 1.55 xG, while the visitors’ defense allows opponents 1.66 xG, which strongly supports SJ Earthquakes scoring at least once. In their last five matches, the Earthquakes conceded 13 goals, or 2.60 per game, while both teams found the net in 80% of those fixtures. The projected total of 2.95 goals points to strong attacking potential, although the hosts’ seasonal rate of just 11% of matches finishing above 2.5 goals lowers confidence in higher lines. Therefore, the most reliable choice is Over 1.5 goals, as the data from both teams strongly points to at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely starting point, as Minnesota were level at the break in 40% of their matches, compared with 33% for San Jose. The hosts score just 0.22 goals per match before half-time, but Minnesota concede as many as 1.10 goals during this period, which limits the visitors’ advantage and supports an evenly balanced opening. After the break, San Jose score an average of 0.56 goals and concede only 0.22, while Minnesota allow 0.90 goals and have a second-half goal balance of -1. In addition, the hosts averaged 1.78 points in the second half compared with Minnesota’s 1.10, making a draw at half-time followed by a San Jose win at full-time the most logical scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 3
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
11Shots11
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
6Shots on target7
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
1.37xG1.45
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
3Corners3
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
35Dangerous attacks37
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
14Fouls15
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
1Cards0
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
1.9Goals scored / match1.1
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
1.4Goals conceded / match1.4
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
48%Average possession47%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
5.2Shots on target / match4.7
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.05Shots per match13.3
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
5.2Shots on target4.7
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
13.5%Shot conversion8.3%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
48%Possession47%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
1.57xG for1.5
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
1.46xG against1.44
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

Shooting quality

SJ Earthquakes: AttackingMinnesota United: Balanced
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
Accuracy (shots on target)37%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Minnesota United is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - SJ Earthquakes · 0.6 pts / match - Minnesota United

SJ Earthquakes
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W15% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-3-7
1.65 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-4
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
DLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Minnesota United
LDDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
30% W35% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-7-7
1.25 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WWLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

SJ Earthquakes is 73% better for: goals scored per match.

1.9 goals / match - SJ Earthquakes · 1.1 goals / match - Minnesota United

SJ Earthquakes scoring profile: very strong

SJ Earthquakes scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while Minnesota United keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).

Minnesota United scoring profile: very strong

Minnesota United scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while SJ Earthquakes keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).

38Goals scored (season)22
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
28Goals conceded (season)28
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
3.3Average goals in match2.5
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
4Goals scored (last 5)4
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
13Goals conceded (last 5)6
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal75%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
55%2 goals30%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
35%3 goals5%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
10%4 goals0%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
30%2 goals40%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
25%3 goals10%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
10%4 goals5%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
Minnesota United - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 20 matches
63%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time20%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
15%BTTS in both halves5%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
35%Scored in both halves10%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
60%BTTS - last 580%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

SJ Earthquakes is 53% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.45 pts / match - SJ Earthquakes · 0.95 pts / match - Minnesota United

SJ Earthquakes - half-time state
35% leading40% draw25% trailing
Minnesota United - half-time state
20% leading35% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.45Points per match (1st half)0.95
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
0.85Goals scored (1st half)0.4
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.2
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
45%Clean sheet before half-time40%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
40%No goal before half-time65%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)1.4
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
1.05Goals scored (2nd half)0.7
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
1.8Average goals (2nd half)1.3
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
55%Clean sheet after half-time45%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United
40%No goal after half-time50%
SJ EarthquakesMinnesota United

SJ Earthquakes - second-half results

35% W35% R30% P
29
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Minnesota United - second-half results

30% W50% R20% P
19
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.95
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

SJ Earthquakes - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.80
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.21.4
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-5-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Minnesota United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

SJ Earthquakes
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
4
5
16-30
6
2
31-45
9
6
46-60
4
2
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Minnesota United
ScoredConceded
2
7
0-15
2
5
16-30
4
4
31-45
4
6
46-60
6
2
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.90
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

SJ Earthquakes

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.45
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Minnesota United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

SJ EarthquakesLigaMinnesota United
Average goals in match 3.303.19 2.50
Both teams scored 60%63% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%61% 50%
Clean sheets 25%21% 25%
Goal before half-time 85%76% 75%
Goal after half-time 75%81% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.19
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.84
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+36%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SJ EarthquakesGoalTimo Werner
  2. Minnesota UnitedGoalJoaquín Nicolás PereyraAssist: Anthony Markanich
  3. Minnesota UnitedGoalKelvin Kwarteng YeboahAssist: Kyle Duncan
  4. Minnesota UnitedGoalKelvin Kwarteng YeboahAssist: Owen Géne
  5. SJ EarthquakesSubstitutionOn: Ian HarkesOff: Jonathan Alexander González Mendoza
  6. SJ EarthquakesSubstitutionOn: Darius JohnsonOff: Timo Werner
  7. Minnesota UnitedGoalMarcus CaldeiraAssist: Kyle Duncan
  8. SJ EarthquakesSubstitutionOn: Jamar RickettsOff: Vítor Costa de Brito
  9. SJ EarthquakesYellow cardBenjamin Kikanovic
  10. Minnesota UnitedSubstitutionOn: Devin PadelfordOff: Anthony Markanich

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of SJ Earthquakes vs Minnesota United?

The MLS match finished SJ Earthquakes 1:5 Minnesota United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before SJ Earthquakes vs Minnesota United?

SJ Earthquakes score 1.90 goals per game on average and Minnesota United 1.10. The MLS average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 60% of SJ Earthquakes's matches and 60% of Minnesota United's.

What form are SJ Earthquakes and Minnesota United in?

Over the last 5 games SJ Earthquakes have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Minnesota United 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJ Earthquakes vs Minnesota United?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for SJ Earthquakes vs Minnesota United: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.