Finland - YkkösliigaData current as of 23 July 2026

SJK Akatemia vs EIF: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

SJK Akatemia vs EIF: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

SJK Akatemia play EIF in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 25 July 2026 at 15:00.

Current form

SJK Akatemia: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. EIF: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

SJK Akatemia scores 0.47 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. EIF scores 1.40 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.47 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: SJK Akatemia 27%, EIF 53%. Over 2.5: SJK Akatemia 20%, EIF 67%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

EIF has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.20. SJK Akatemia: 9.3 shots per match, EIF: 10.2.

Match halves

SJK Akatemia: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.40. EIF: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.87.

Goals by minute

SJK Akatemia: 76-90+ (4 goals). EIF: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

4 H2H matches: 1-0-3. Average goals 3.25, BTTS 50%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(2.52)
(3.35)
(2.45)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.47Goals scored / match1.4
SJK AkatemiaEIF
1.33Goals conceded / match2
SJK AkatemiaEIF
49%Average possession51%
SJK AkatemiaEIF
2.73Shots on target / match3.93
SJK AkatemiaEIF

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.27Shots per match10.2
SJK AkatemiaEIF
2.73Shots on target3.93
SJK AkatemiaEIF
5%Shot conversion13.7%
SJK AkatemiaEIF
49%Possession51%
SJK AkatemiaEIF
1.2xG for1.35
SJK AkatemiaEIF
1.74xG against1.48
SJK AkatemiaEIF

Shooting quality

SJK Akatemia: BalancedEIF: Efficient finishing
SJK AkatemiaEIF
Accuracy (shots on target)29%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.170.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

SJK Akatemia is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - SJK Akatemia · 0.2 pts / match - EIF

SJK Akatemia
LLLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
7% W33% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-5-9
0.53 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-4
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.94BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
EIF
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W7% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-9
1.07 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-6
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

EIF is 198% better for: goals scored per match.

0.47 goals / match - SJK Akatemia · 1.4 goals / match - EIF

SJK Akatemia is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.33 goals / match - SJK Akatemia · 2 goals / match - EIF

SJK Akatemia scoring profile: mixed

SJK Akatemia scores in 33% of matches (5 of 15 matches), while EIF keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).

EIF scoring profile: very strong

EIF scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).

7Goals scored (season)21
SJK AkatemiaEIF
20Goals conceded (season)30
SJK AkatemiaEIF
1.8Average goals in match3.4
SJK AkatemiaEIF
3Goals scored (last 5)3
SJK AkatemiaEIF
8Goals conceded (last 5)13
SJK AkatemiaEIF

How often they score at least...

33%1 goal73%
SJK AkatemiaEIF
13%2 goals33%
SJK AkatemiaEIF
0%3 goals20%
SJK AkatemiaEIF
0%4 goals7%
SJK AkatemiaEIF

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal80%
SJK AkatemiaEIF
40%2 goals53%
SJK AkatemiaEIF
7%3 goals40%
SJK AkatemiaEIF
0%4 goals20%
SJK AkatemiaEIF

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time27%
SJK AkatemiaEIF
0%BTTS in both halves20%
SJK AkatemiaEIF
0%Scored in both halves27%
SJK AkatemiaEIF

BTTS and goal count

13%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
SJK AkatemiaEIF
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
SJK AkatemiaEIF
40%BTTS - last 560%
SJK AkatemiaEIF

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

47%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
SJK AkatemiaEIF
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
SJK AkatemiaEIF
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
SJK AkatemiaEIF

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
SJK AkatemiaEIF
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
SJK AkatemiaEIF
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time47%
SJK AkatemiaEIF

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

EIF is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.73 pts / match - SJK Akatemia · 1 pts / match - EIF

SJK Akatemia - half-time state
7% leading53% draw40% trailing
EIF - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.73Points per match (1st half)1
SJK AkatemiaEIF
0.07Goals scored (1st half)0.53
SJK AkatemiaEIF
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
SJK AkatemiaEIF
0.6Average goals (1st half)1.27
SJK AkatemiaEIF
60%Clean sheet before half-time53%
SJK AkatemiaEIF
93%No goal before half-time60%
SJK AkatemiaEIF

After half-time (2nd half)

0.67Points per match (2nd half)1.33
SJK AkatemiaEIF
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
SJK AkatemiaEIF
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)1.27
SJK AkatemiaEIF
1.2Average goals (2nd half)2.13
SJK AkatemiaEIF
33%Clean sheet after half-time33%
SJK AkatemiaEIF
73%No goal after half-time40%
SJK AkatemiaEIF

SJK Akatemia - second-half results

7% W47% R47% P
11
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 7%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

EIF - second-half results

40% W13% R47% P
15
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

SJK Akatemia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.40
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match0.41.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
EIF - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.62.0
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-8
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

SJK Akatemia
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
4
16-30
0
3
31-45
2
8
46-60
0
3
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

EIF
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
2
2
16-30
4
6
31-45
4
7
46-60
1
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
24%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

SJK Akatemia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.73
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
35%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
57% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
57%

EIF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
150%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.87
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

SJK AkatemiaLigaEIF
Average goals in match 1.802.47 3.40
Both teams scored 27%44% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 20%44% 67%
Clean sheets 13%31% 20%
Goal before half-time 47%60% 60%
Goal after half-time 73%73% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.47
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): SJK Akatemia 1 - 0 - 3 EIF. Average goals 3.25, both teams scored in 50% matches.

EIF
3 : 0
SJK Akatemia
Ekenäs IF
2 : 3
Kerho 07 SJK II
Ekenäs IF
3 : 1
Kerho 07 SJK II
Kerho 07 SJK II
0 : 1
Ekenäs IF

FAQ

When do SJK Akatemia and EIF play?

SJK Akatemia face EIF on 25 July 2026 in Ykkösliiga. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between SJK Akatemia and EIF?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches SJK Akatemia won 1, EIF won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before SJK Akatemia vs EIF?

SJK Akatemia score 0.47 goals per game on average and EIF 1.40. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 27% of SJK Akatemia's matches and 53% of EIF's.

What form are SJK Akatemia and EIF in?

Over the last 5 games SJK Akatemia have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and EIF 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJK Akatemia vs EIF?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for SJK Akatemia vs EIF: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.