SJK Akatemia vs JäPS: match statistics
SJK Akatemia vs JäPS: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
SJK Akatemia play JäPS in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 9 May 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
SJK Akatemia: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. JäPS: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
SJK Akatemia scores 0.47 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. JäPS scores 0.93 and concedes 1.53. League average: 2.47 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: SJK Akatemia 27%, JäPS 27%. Over 2.5: SJK Akatemia 20%, JäPS 47%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
JäPS has higher xG: 1.21 vs 1.20. SJK Akatemia: 9.3 shots per match, JäPS: 9.5.
Match halves
SJK Akatemia: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.40. JäPS: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.40.
Goals by minute
SJK Akatemia: 76-90+ (4 goals). JäPS: 61-75 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
4 H2H matches: 1-2-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 75%.
Match description
I project a home win (SJK Akatemia). At home SJK averages 0.5 goals scored and 0.5 goals conceded per match, records a 50% clean sheet rate and a 50% home win rate, with average xG for 0.76 and xG against 2.17. JäPS away averages 0 goals scored, 100% of matches without scoring and concedes 2.5 goals per match on average, although overall they have won 4 of their last 5 matches and scored 15 goals. Both teams have similar xG for (0.76 vs 0.77), but JäPS produces more on-target shots away (3 vs 1.5) with lower possession (36% vs 49%), indicating chance creation but low away efficiency. Considering SJK’s solid home defense and JäPS’s away issues, I assess probabilities as 60% home, 25% draw and 15% away.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| SJK Akatemia | JäPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.17 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
JäPS is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - SJK Akatemia · 1.2 pts / match - JäPS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JäPS is 98% better for: goals scored per match.
0.47 goals / match - SJK Akatemia · 0.93 goals / match - JäPS
SJK Akatemia is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.33 goals / match - SJK Akatemia · 1.53 goals / match - JäPS
SJK Akatemia scores in 33% of matches (5 of 15 matches), while JäPS keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).
JäPS scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — SJK Akatemia
Over / Under — JäPS
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
JäPS is 101% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.73 pts / match - SJK Akatemia · 1.47 pts / match - JäPS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
SJK Akatemia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 7%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
JäPS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -8 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
SJK Akatemia
JäPS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| SJK Akatemia | Liga | JäPS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.80 | 2.47 | • 2.47 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 27% | 44% | ▼ 27% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 20% | 44% | ▲ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 31% | ▲ 47% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 47% | 60% | • 60% |
| Goal after half-time | • 73% | 73% | • 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): SJK Akatemia 1 - 2 - 1 JäPS. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 75% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of SJK Akatemia vs JäPS?
The Ykkösliiga match finished SJK Akatemia 0:2 JäPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between SJK Akatemia and JäPS?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches SJK Akatemia won 1, JäPS won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before SJK Akatemia vs JäPS?
SJK Akatemia score 0.47 goals per game on average and JäPS 0.93. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 27% of SJK Akatemia's matches and 27% of JäPS's.
What form are SJK Akatemia and JäPS in?
Over the last 5 games SJK Akatemia have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and JäPS 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJK Akatemia vs JäPS?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.