Finland - YkkösliigaData current as of 18 September 2026

SJK Akatemia vs KäPa: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

SJK Akatemia vs KäPa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

SJK Akatemia play KäPa in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 19 September 2026.

Current form

SJK Akatemia: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. KäPa: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

SJK Akatemia scores 0.61 and concedes 1.61 goals per match. KäPa scores 1.04 and concedes 1.78. League average: 2.56 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: SJK Akatemia 35%, KäPa 65%. Over 2.5: SJK Akatemia 30%, KäPa 70%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

KäPa has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.21. SJK Akatemia: 9.9 shots per match, KäPa: 10.6.

Match halves

SJK Akatemia: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.43. KäPa: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.52.

Goals by minute

SJK Akatemia: 76-90+ (6 goals). KäPa: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-2-1. Average goals 4.60, BTTS 80%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(2.40)
(3.50)
(2.55)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.61Goals scored / match1.04
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
1.61Goals conceded / match1.78
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
49%Average possession50%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
2.7Shots on target / match3.61
SJK AkatemiaKäPa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.87Shots per match10.61
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
2.7Shots on target3.61
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
6.2%Shot conversion9.8%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
49%Possession50%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
1.21xG for1.34
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
1.88xG against1.65
SJK AkatemiaKäPa

Shooting quality

SJK Akatemia: BalancedKäPa: Balanced
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
Accuracy (shots on target)27%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

SJK Akatemia is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - SJK Akatemia · 0.4 pts / match - KäPa

SJK Akatemia
WLLLD
Season result split
9% W30% D61% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-7-14
0.57 pts / match · goal difference -23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-3-7
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
DDLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 2.32BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
KäPa
LLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W26% D57% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-6-13
0.78 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-7
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.80BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KäPa is 70% better for: goals scored per match.

0.61 goals / match - SJK Akatemia · 1.04 goals / match - KäPa

SJK Akatemia is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.61 goals / match - SJK Akatemia · 1.78 goals / match - KäPa

SJK Akatemia scoring profile: strong

SJK Akatemia scores in 43% of matches (10 of 23 matches), while KäPa keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 23 matches).

KäPa scoring profile: very strong

KäPa scores in 70% of matches (16 of 23 matches), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).

14Goals scored (season)24
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
37Goals conceded (season)41
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
2.22Average goals in match2.83
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
6Goals scored (last 5)5
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
12Goals conceded (last 5)11
SJK AkatemiaKäPa

How often they score at least...

43%1 goal70%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
17%2 goals30%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
0%3 goals4%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
0%4 goals0%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal87%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
48%2 goals65%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
17%3 goals22%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
4%4 goals4%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

44%
League average

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time22%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
0%BTTS in both halves0%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
4%Scored in both halves13%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa

BTTS and goal count

22%Min. 3 goals and BTTS65%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
60%BTTS - last 580%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time52%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KäPa is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.87 pts / match - SJK Akatemia · 1.04 pts / match - KäPa

SJK Akatemia - half-time state
13% leading48% draw39% trailing
KäPa - half-time state
22% leading39% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.87Points per match (1st half)1.04
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
0.17Goals scored (1st half)0.52
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
0.61Goals conceded (1st half)0.87
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
0.78Average goals (1st half)1.39
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
57%Clean sheet before half-time52%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
83%No goal before half-time57%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa

After half-time (2nd half)

0.61Points per match (2nd half)0.7
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.52
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.91
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
1.43Average goals (2nd half)1.43
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
30%Clean sheet after half-time35%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa
70%No goal after half-time61%
SJK AkatemiaKäPa

SJK Akatemia - second-half results

9% W35% D57% L
20
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.87
PPG before half-time
Lead holding69%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 9%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KäPa - second-half results

9% W43% D48% L
24
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding77%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

SJK Akatemia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.60
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.8
Average goals in match1.02.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
KäPa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.00
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-5-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

SJK Akatemia
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
0
5
16-30
2
6
31-45
2
12
46-60
2
5
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

KäPa
ScoredConceded
6
5
0-15
3
8
16-30
3
7
31-45
5
5
46-60
6
3
61-75
1
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -12 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.52
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+82%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
30%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

SJK Akatemia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.67
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.60
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
46%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
43% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
43%

KäPa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
134%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
4% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
4%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

SJK AkatemiaLigaKäPa
Average goals in match 2.222.56 2.83
Both teams scored 35%44% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 30%46% 70%
Clean sheets 17%31% 13%
Goal before half-time 57%65% 70%
Goal after half-time 78%74% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.56
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
1.23
Away goals / match
+8%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): SJK Akatemia 2 - 2 - 1 KäPa. Average goals 4.60, both teams scored in 80% matches.

KäPa
2 : 2
SJK Akatemia
KäPa
2 : 2
SJK Akatemia
Käpylän Pallo
3 : 1
Kerho 07 SJK II
Kerho 07 SJK II
5 : 3
Käpylän Pallo
Käpylän Pallo
0 : 3
Kerho 07 SJK II

FAQ

When do SJK Akatemia and KäPa play?

SJK Akatemia face KäPa on 19 September 2026 in Ykkösliiga. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between SJK Akatemia and KäPa?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches SJK Akatemia won 2, KäPa won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before SJK Akatemia vs KäPa?

SJK Akatemia score 0.61 goals per game on average and KäPa 1.04. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 35% of SJK Akatemia's matches and 65% of KäPa's.

What form are SJK Akatemia and KäPa in?

Over the last 5 games SJK Akatemia have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and KäPa 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJK Akatemia vs KäPa?

The statistical background for SJK Akatemia vs KäPa — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.