Finland - YkkösliigaData current as of 15 October 2026

SJK Akatemia vs KTP: match statistics

SJK Akatemia crest
SJK Akatemia
4 : 3half-time 0:1
KTP crest
KTP

SJK Akatemia vs KTP: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

SJK Akatemia played KTP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 11 October 2026. Final score: 4:3.

Current form

SJK Akatemia: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. KTP: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

SJK Akatemia scores 0.68 and concedes 1.64 goals per match. KTP scores 1.80 and concedes 0.88. League average: 2.61 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: SJK Akatemia 40%, KTP 44%. Over 2.5: SJK Akatemia 32%, KTP 48%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

KTP has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.27. SJK Akatemia: 10.4 shots per match, KTP: 14.5.

Match halves

SJK Akatemia: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.48. KTP: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.12.

Goals by minute

SJK Akatemia: 76-90+ (6 goals). KTP: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.61 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KTP are top of the table and have won 18 of their 25 matches, while tenth-placed SJK Akatemia have recorded just 2 wins. The visitors are unbeaten in their last 5 matches, winning 4 and conceding just 2 goals; the hosts have failed to win during that span and have conceded 14. KTP’s advantage is also clear away from home: they win 75% of their away matches, score an average of 1.58 goals and concede 0.75, while SJK win just 8% of their home games, scoring 0.67 and conceding 1.83. The visitors create better chances, averaging 1.65 xG away from home compared with the hosts’ 1.25 xG at home, while opponents generate 1.96 xG against SJK’s defence. Given this significant gap in efficiency and form, a KTP win is the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest case for BTTS - No is KTP’s defence: the visitors have kept a clean sheet in 75% of their matches and conceded an average of just 0.4 goals over their last 5 games. Across the season, both teams scored in 25% of KTP’s matches, compared with 62% of SJK Akatemia’s, highlighting a clear contrast between their profiles. The hosts nevertheless have a realistic chance of scoring, averaging 2.0 goals at home and generating an xG of 1.79, so the case for BTTS - No is not overwhelming. KTP average 1.58 goals away from home, while SJK conceded 2.8 goals per game over their last 5 matches, making the hosts’ failure to score more likely to decide this market than the visitors’.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

SJK Akatemia average 2.0 goals at home, while KTP score 1.58 goals away, pointing to at least two goals in this match. In their last 5 matches, the hosts conceded an average of 2.8 goals, while the visitors scored 2.2, so I see KTP as having the greater attacking potential. At the same time, KTP kept a clean sheet in 75% of their away matches and conceded just 0.4 goals per match across their last 5 outings, which limits the hosts’ scoring prospects. Over 1.5 goals is the strongest pick: it landed in 77% of SJK Akatemia’s home matches, with the projected total at 2.70 goals. The higher Over 2.5 goals line is less appealing, having landed in only 33% of KTP’s away matches.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is current form: KTP have won 4 of their last 5 matches, while SJK Akatemia have failed to win any and have conceded an average of 2.8 goals per match, compared with just 0.4 conceded by the visitors. KTP led at the break in 4 of those 5 matches, while the hosts were trailing at half-time in 2 of 5 and conceded an average of 0.8 goals in the first half. The visitors’ advantage could persist after the interval, as they have won the second half in 4 of their last 5 matches, while SJK have lost the second half 4 times, conceding an average of 2 goals in those games. The teams’ season-long xG figures are similar — 1.79 for the hosts and 1.65 for the visitors — so a draw at half-time remains a significant alternative. However, the combination of KTP’s frequent early leads and their clear edge in second-half form most strongly points to the visitors leading both at half-time and at full-time in the HT/FT market.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
4 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
SJK AkatemiaKTP
22Shots17
SJK AkatemiaKTP
8Shots on target11
SJK AkatemiaKTP
2.41xG2.19
SJK AkatemiaKTP
8Corners4
SJK AkatemiaKTP
66Dangerous attacks49
SJK AkatemiaKTP
3Fouls8
SJK AkatemiaKTP
0Cards1
SJK AkatemiaKTP

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.68Goals scored / match1.8
SJK AkatemiaKTP
1.64Goals conceded / match0.88
SJK AkatemiaKTP
49%Average possession50%
SJK AkatemiaKTP
3.04Shots on target / match5.32
SJK AkatemiaKTP

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.44Shots per match14.52
SJK AkatemiaKTP
3.04Shots on target5.32
SJK AkatemiaKTP
6.5%Shot conversion12.4%
SJK AkatemiaKTP
49%Possession50%
SJK AkatemiaKTP
1.27xG for1.72
SJK AkatemiaKTP
1.88xG against1.28
SJK AkatemiaKTP

Shooting quality

SJK Akatemia: BalancedKTP: Attacking
SJK AkatemiaKTP
Accuracy (shots on target)29%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.220.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KTP is 550% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - SJK Akatemia · 2.6 pts / match - KTP

SJK Akatemia
LLDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
8% W32% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-8-15
0.56 pts / match · goal difference -24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-3-8
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 2.20BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%
KTP
WWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
72% W16% D12% L
Season (W-D-L)
18-4-3
2.32 pts / match · goal difference +23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-2-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KTP is 165% better for: goals scored per match.

0.68 goals / match - SJK Akatemia · 1.8 goals / match - KTP

KTP is 86% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.64 goals / match - SJK Akatemia · 0.88 goals / match - KTP

SJK Akatemia scoring profile: mixed

SJK Akatemia scores in 48% of matches (12 of 25 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 48% (12 of 25 matches).

KTP scoring profile: very strong

KTP scores in 88% of matches (22 of 25 matches), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 16% (4 of 25 matches).

17Goals scored (season)45
SJK AkatemiaKTP
41Goals conceded (season)22
SJK AkatemiaKTP
2.32Average goals in match2.68
SJK AkatemiaKTP
8Goals scored (last 5)11
SJK AkatemiaKTP
14Goals conceded (last 5)2
SJK AkatemiaKTP

How often they score at least...

48%1 goal88%
SJK AkatemiaKTP
20%2 goals56%
SJK AkatemiaKTP
0%3 goals24%
SJK AkatemiaKTP
0%4 goals8%
SJK AkatemiaKTP

How often they concede at least...

84%1 goal52%
SJK AkatemiaKTP
48%2 goals16%
SJK AkatemiaKTP
20%3 goals12%
SJK AkatemiaKTP
4%4 goals4%
SJK AkatemiaKTP

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

45%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time24%
SJK AkatemiaKTP
4%BTTS in both halves12%
SJK AkatemiaKTP
8%Scored in both halves48%
SJK AkatemiaKTP

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
SJK AkatemiaKTP
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
SJK AkatemiaKTP
100%BTTS - last 540%
SJK AkatemiaKTP

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
SJK AkatemiaKTP
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
SJK AkatemiaKTP
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
SJK AkatemiaKTP

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
SJK AkatemiaKTP
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
SJK AkatemiaKTP
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
SJK AkatemiaKTP

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KTP is 90% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.84 pts / match - SJK Akatemia · 1.6 pts / match - KTP

SJK Akatemia - half-time state
12% leading48% draw40% trailing
KTP - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.84Points per match (1st half)1.6
SJK AkatemiaKTP
0.2Goals scored (1st half)0.68
SJK AkatemiaKTP
0.64Goals conceded (1st half)0.48
SJK AkatemiaKTP
0.84Average goals (1st half)1.16
SJK AkatemiaKTP
52%Clean sheet before half-time64%
SJK AkatemiaKTP
80%No goal before half-time40%
SJK AkatemiaKTP

After half-time (2nd half)

0.68Points per match (2nd half)2.08
SJK AkatemiaKTP
0.48Goals scored (2nd half)1.12
SJK AkatemiaKTP
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
SJK AkatemiaKTP
1.48Average goals (2nd half)1.52
SJK AkatemiaKTP
32%Clean sheet after half-time68%
SJK AkatemiaKTP
64%No goal after half-time24%
SJK AkatemiaKTP

SJK Akatemia - second-half results

12% W32% D56% L
21
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.84
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 8%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KTP - second-half results

60% W28% D12% L
40
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
52
Second-half points
+18
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding180%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 72%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

SJK Akatemia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.60
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.82.0
Average goals in match1.43.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
KTP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.402.60
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal20%0%
Goal difference+3+6
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

SJK Akatemia
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
1
6
16-30
2
7
31-45
4
12
46-60
2
6
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

KTP
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
5
2
16-30
5
6
31-45
5
5
46-60
9
2
61-75
14
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

SJK Akatemia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.61
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.59
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
50%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
132%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

KTP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
145%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

SJK AkatemiaLigaKTP
Average goals in match▼ 2.322.61• 2.68
Both teams scored▼ 40%45%• 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 32%47%• 48%
Clean sheets▼ 16%31%▲ 48%
Goal before half-time▼ 60%67%▲ 72%
Goal after half-time▲ 80%74%▲ 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.61
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
1.24
Away goals / match
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KTPSubstitutionOn: Luka PuhakainenOff: Samuli Hölttä
  2. SJK AkatemiaSubstitutionOn: Aziz CisséOff: Alkhaly Momo Cissé
  3. SJK AkatemiaGoalCauet Werner EspíndolaAssist: Ilyes Berjali
  4. SJK AkatemiaGoalIlyes BerjaliAssist: Aziz Cissé
  5. KTPSubstitutionOn: Otto EloluotoOff: Arttu Tulehmo
  6. SJK AkatemiaSubstitutionOn: Danila BulgakovOff: Haralds Silagailis
  7. KTPYellow cardMatias Paavola
  8. SJK AkatemiaGoalDanila BulgakovAssist: Aziz Cissé
  9. SJK AkatemiaSubstitutionOn: Oskari RaiskiOff: Cauet Werner Espíndola
  10. SJK AkatemiaGoalAnge Christ AchiAssist: Danila Bulgakov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): SJK Akatemia 0 - 0 - 2 KTP. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of SJK Akatemia vs KTP?

The Ykkösliiga match finished SJK Akatemia 4:3 KTP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between SJK Akatemia and KTP?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches SJK Akatemia won 0, KTP won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before SJK Akatemia vs KTP?

SJK Akatemia score 0.68 goals per game on average and KTP 1.80. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.61 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 40% of SJK Akatemia's matches and 44% of KTP's.

What form are SJK Akatemia and KTP in?

Over the last 5 games SJK Akatemia have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and KTP 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJK Akatemia vs KTP?

The statistical background for SJK Akatemia vs KTP — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.