SJK Akatemia vs MP: match statistics
SJK Akatemia vs MP: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
SJK Akatemia played MP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 11 July 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
SJK Akatemia: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. MP: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
SJK Akatemia scores 0.31 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. MP scores 0.92 and concedes 1.15. League average: 2.44 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: SJK Akatemia 15%, MP 38%. Over 2.5: SJK Akatemia 15%, MP 38%. League level: BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
MP has higher xG: 1.21 vs 1.16. SJK Akatemia: 9.2 shots per match, MP: 9.8.
Match halves
SJK Akatemia: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.23. MP: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.46.
Goals by minute
SJK Akatemia: 76-90+ (2 goals). MP: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.44 goals per match, BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back an away win for MP; so far this season MP have scored 12 goals and recorded 5 wins versus SJK Akatemia's 4 goals and only 1 win. In the last 5 matches MP have scored 6 goals and average 1.4 points per game, while SJK have failed to score in those five fixtures and average just 0.2 points per game. In terms of chance quality, average xG is 1.09 for SJK in home matches versus 1.22 for MP away, however the home side convert extremely poorly — only 0.17 goals per game with a conversion rate of around 2% and 2.67 shots on target, while MP average 0.71 goals per game, ~7% conversion and 4 shots on target. Defensively both teams conceded 6 goals in the last 5 matches; on average SJK concede 1.00 goal per home game versus 1.14 conceded by MP away, but the share of clean sheets for the hosts is significant — 83% versus 43% for the visitors. Given clearly better efficiency, more goals (12 vs 4), superior 1.4 points per game in the last 5 fixtures and a lower share of matches without a goal for MP, I assess the probabilities as: away win 60%, draw 25%, home win 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I lean toward the No scenario: SJK Akatemia have scored 0 and conceded 6 in their last 5 matches (avg 0.0 and 1.2), while MP have scored 6 and conceded 6 in their last 5 (avg 1.2 and 1.2), indicating a lack of offensive output from the hosts. Seasonally SJK show BTTS at 50% vs 29% for MP with the league average at 41%, but recent trends favor No Goal. Both teams have similar offensive xG (SJK 1.20 vs MP 1.22) with xG against 1.49 vs 1.46; however SJK produced xG 1.27 over the last 5 matches and still failed to score, indicating low finishing efficiency. MP register more shots on target (4.0 vs 3.17) but have lower conversion (7% vs 12%), so a single MP goal without a response from the hosts is more likely; therefore I assign higher probability to No (65% vs 35%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model combines teams' attacking xG and opponents' xG and produces expected goals of 1.33 for SJK Akatemia and 1.36 for MP, totaling 2.69 goals, which is above the league average of 2.38. With combined λ=2.69 the Poisson distribution yields P(0)=6.8% and P(1)=18.2%, so the probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) is about 75%, at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) about 50%, and at least 4 goals (Over 3.5) about 28%. Season statistics confirm a moderate tendency for goals: SJK averages 1.17 scored and 1.17 conceded per match, MP scores 0.71 and concedes 1.14; their xG for are 1.20 and 1.22, and xG against 1.49 and 1.46, which justifies the 1.33/1.36 expectations. Additionally SJK has 100% of matches with over 0.5 goals and 50% with over 1.5, MP respectively 100% and 43%, and in the last 5 matches MP scored 6 goals versus 0 for SJK, which increases the likelihood of away goals and strengthens the signal for at least 2 goals. As a result the strongest pick is Over 1.5 (~75% probability), while Over 2.5 is balanced (~50/50) and Over 3.5 has low probability (~28%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
SJK Akatemia averages 1.17 goals per match versus MP’s 0.71, and scores an average of 0.67 goals in the first half compared to the visitors’ 0.29, which strongly favors the home side to lead at the break. The hosts led at half-time in 4 matches (67%) while MP led in only 1 match (14%); additionally SJK has a higher shot conversion rate (12% vs 7%) despite similar xG (1.20 vs 1.22). For Full-Time I prefer a home win, since SJK’s points per game average is 1.67 versus MP’s 0.86 and the hosts win 50% of matches compared to the visitors’ 29%, although in the last 5 games SJK has 0% wins versus MP’s 40%, which reduces confidence. The second half may bring a turnaround — the visitors have 71% of matches with at least one goal after the break, and both teams concede roughly 0.83–0.86 goals in second halves, so comeback scenarios are realistic. Therefore the most likely scenario is the home side leading at half-time and winning at full-time (1/1), to which I assign 35%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| SJK Akatemia | MP | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 26% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.13 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
MP is 600% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - SJK Akatemia · 1.4 pts / match - MP
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
MP is 197% better for: goals scored per match.
0.31 goals / match - SJK Akatemia · 0.92 goals / match - MP
MP is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.31 goals / match - SJK Akatemia · 1.15 goals / match - MP
SJK Akatemia scores in 23% of matches (3 of 13 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).
MP scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - SJK Akatemia
Over / Under - MP
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
MP is 123% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.69 pts / match - SJK Akatemia · 1.54 pts / match - MP
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
SJK Akatemia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 8%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
MP - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
SJK Akatemia
MP
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| SJK Akatemia | Liga | MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.62 | 2.44 | ▼ 2.08 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 15% | 42% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 15% | 44% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 33% | ▼ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 54% | 64% | ▲ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 73% | ▼ 62% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: SJK Akatemia 1 - 0 - 0 MP. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of SJK Akatemia vs MP?
The Ykkösliiga match finished SJK Akatemia 1:1 MP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before SJK Akatemia vs MP?
SJK Akatemia score 0.31 goals per game on average and MP 0.92. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.44 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 15% of SJK Akatemia's matches and 38% of MP's.
What form are SJK Akatemia and MP in?
Over the last 5 games SJK Akatemia have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and MP 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJK Akatemia vs MP?
The statistical background for SJK Akatemia vs MP — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


