Finland - YkkösliigaData current as of 07 September 2026

SJK Akatemia vs MP: match statistics

SJK Akatemia crest
SJK Akatemia
1 : 1half-time 0:0
MP crest
MP

SJK Akatemia vs MP: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

SJK Akatemia played MP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 11 July 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

SJK Akatemia: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. MP: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

SJK Akatemia scores 0.31 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. MP scores 0.92 and concedes 1.15. League average: 2.44 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: SJK Akatemia 15%, MP 38%. Over 2.5: SJK Akatemia 15%, MP 38%. League level: BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

MP has higher xG: 1.21 vs 1.16. SJK Akatemia: 9.2 shots per match, MP: 9.8.

Match halves

SJK Akatemia: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.23. MP: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.46.

Goals by minute

SJK Akatemia: 76-90+ (2 goals). MP: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.44 goals per match, BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back an away win for MP; so far this season MP have scored 12 goals and recorded 5 wins versus SJK Akatemia's 4 goals and only 1 win. In the last 5 matches MP have scored 6 goals and average 1.4 points per game, while SJK have failed to score in those five fixtures and average just 0.2 points per game. In terms of chance quality, average xG is 1.09 for SJK in home matches versus 1.22 for MP away, however the home side convert extremely poorly — only 0.17 goals per game with a conversion rate of around 2% and 2.67 shots on target, while MP average 0.71 goals per game, ~7% conversion and 4 shots on target. Defensively both teams conceded 6 goals in the last 5 matches; on average SJK concede 1.00 goal per home game versus 1.14 conceded by MP away, but the share of clean sheets for the hosts is significant — 83% versus 43% for the visitors. Given clearly better efficiency, more goals (12 vs 4), superior 1.4 points per game in the last 5 fixtures and a lower share of matches without a goal for MP, I assess the probabilities as: away win 60%, draw 25%, home win 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I lean toward the No scenario: SJK Akatemia have scored 0 and conceded 6 in their last 5 matches (avg 0.0 and 1.2), while MP have scored 6 and conceded 6 in their last 5 (avg 1.2 and 1.2), indicating a lack of offensive output from the hosts. Seasonally SJK show BTTS at 50% vs 29% for MP with the league average at 41%, but recent trends favor No Goal. Both teams have similar offensive xG (SJK 1.20 vs MP 1.22) with xG against 1.49 vs 1.46; however SJK produced xG 1.27 over the last 5 matches and still failed to score, indicating low finishing efficiency. MP register more shots on target (4.0 vs 3.17) but have lower conversion (7% vs 12%), so a single MP goal without a response from the hosts is more likely; therefore I assign higher probability to No (65% vs 35%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model combines teams' attacking xG and opponents' xG and produces expected goals of 1.33 for SJK Akatemia and 1.36 for MP, totaling 2.69 goals, which is above the league average of 2.38. With combined λ=2.69 the Poisson distribution yields P(0)=6.8% and P(1)=18.2%, so the probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) is about 75%, at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) about 50%, and at least 4 goals (Over 3.5) about 28%. Season statistics confirm a moderate tendency for goals: SJK averages 1.17 scored and 1.17 conceded per match, MP scores 0.71 and concedes 1.14; their xG for are 1.20 and 1.22, and xG against 1.49 and 1.46, which justifies the 1.33/1.36 expectations. Additionally SJK has 100% of matches with over 0.5 goals and 50% with over 1.5, MP respectively 100% and 43%, and in the last 5 matches MP scored 6 goals versus 0 for SJK, which increases the likelihood of away goals and strengthens the signal for at least 2 goals. As a result the strongest pick is Over 1.5 (~75% probability), while Over 2.5 is balanced (~50/50) and Over 3.5 has low probability (~28%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

SJK Akatemia averages 1.17 goals per match versus MP’s 0.71, and scores an average of 0.67 goals in the first half compared to the visitors’ 0.29, which strongly favors the home side to lead at the break. The hosts led at half-time in 4 matches (67%) while MP led in only 1 match (14%); additionally SJK has a higher shot conversion rate (12% vs 7%) despite similar xG (1.20 vs 1.22). For Full-Time I prefer a home win, since SJK’s points per game average is 1.67 versus MP’s 0.86 and the hosts win 50% of matches compared to the visitors’ 29%, although in the last 5 games SJK has 0% wins versus MP’s 40%, which reduces confidence. The second half may bring a turnaround — the visitors have 71% of matches with at least one goal after the break, and both teams concede roughly 0.83–0.86 goals in second halves, so comeback scenarios are realistic. Therefore the most likely scenario is the home side leading at half-time and winning at full-time (1/1), to which I assign 35%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
SJK AkatemiaMP
11Shots17
SJK AkatemiaMP
4Shots on target7
SJK AkatemiaMP
1.38xG2.06
SJK AkatemiaMP
6Corners6
SJK AkatemiaMP
57Dangerous attacks69
SJK AkatemiaMP
8Fouls7
SJK AkatemiaMP
1Cards1
SJK AkatemiaMP

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.31Goals scored / match0.92
SJK AkatemiaMP
1.31Goals conceded / match1.15
SJK AkatemiaMP
50%Average possession48%
SJK AkatemiaMP
2.38Shots on target / match3.62
SJK AkatemiaMP

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.15Shots per match9.85
SJK AkatemiaMP
2.38Shots on target3.62
SJK AkatemiaMP
3.4%Shot conversion9.4%
SJK AkatemiaMP
50%Possession48%
SJK AkatemiaMP
1.16xG for1.21
SJK AkatemiaMP
1.74xG against1.47
SJK AkatemiaMP

Shooting quality

SJK Akatemia: BalancedMP: Balanced
SJK AkatemiaMP
Accuracy (shots on target)26%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.130.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

MP is 600% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - SJK Akatemia · 1.4 pts / match - MP

SJK Akatemia
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
8% W23% R69% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-9
0.46 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-4
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 2.03BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
MP
WLDLW
Season result split
38% W8% R54% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-7
1.23 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-5
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.95Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

MP is 197% better for: goals scored per match.

0.31 goals / match - SJK Akatemia · 0.92 goals / match - MP

MP is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.31 goals / match - SJK Akatemia · 1.15 goals / match - MP

SJK Akatemia scoring profile: more difficult

SJK Akatemia scores in 23% of matches (3 of 13 matches), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).

MP scoring profile: very strong

MP scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

4Goals scored (season)12
SJK AkatemiaMP
17Goals conceded (season)15
SJK AkatemiaMP
1.62Average goals in match2.08
SJK AkatemiaMP
0Goals scored (last 5)6
SJK AkatemiaMP
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
SJK AkatemiaMP

How often they score at least...

23%1 goal69%
SJK AkatemiaMP
8%2 goals23%
SJK AkatemiaMP
0%3 goals0%
SJK AkatemiaMP
0%4 goals0%
SJK AkatemiaMP

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal69%
SJK AkatemiaMP
38%2 goals31%
SJK AkatemiaMP
8%3 goals15%
SJK AkatemiaMP
0%4 goals0%
SJK AkatemiaMP

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time8%
SJK AkatemiaMP
0%BTTS in both halves0%
SJK AkatemiaMP
0%Scored in both halves8%
SJK AkatemiaMP

BTTS and goal count

8%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
SJK AkatemiaMP
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
SJK AkatemiaMP
0%BTTS - last 560%
SJK AkatemiaMP

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

54%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
SJK AkatemiaMP
15%Min. 2 goals before half-time8%
SJK AkatemiaMP
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
SJK AkatemiaMP

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
SJK AkatemiaMP
23%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
SJK AkatemiaMP
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
SJK AkatemiaMP

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

MP is 123% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.69 pts / match - SJK Akatemia · 1.54 pts / match - MP

SJK Akatemia - half-time state
8% leading46% draw46% trailing
MP - half-time state
38% leading38% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.69Points per match (1st half)1.54
SJK AkatemiaMP
0.08Goals scored (1st half)0.46
SJK AkatemiaMP
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.31
SJK AkatemiaMP
0.69Average goals (1st half)0.77
SJK AkatemiaMP
54%Clean sheet before half-time69%
SJK AkatemiaMP
92%No goal before half-time54%
SJK AkatemiaMP

After half-time (2nd half)

0.62Points per match (2nd half)0.92
SJK AkatemiaMP
0.23Goals scored (2nd half)0.46
SJK AkatemiaMP
0.69Goals conceded (2nd half)0.85
SJK AkatemiaMP
0.92Average goals (2nd half)1.31
SJK AkatemiaMP
38%Clean sheet after half-time46%
SJK AkatemiaMP
85%No goal after half-time69%
SJK AkatemiaMP

SJK Akatemia - second-half results

8% W38% R54% P
9
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 8%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

MP - second-half results

15% W46% R38% P
20
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

SJK Akatemia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.40
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-3-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
MP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

SJK Akatemia
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
4
16-30
0
3
31-45
1
6
46-60
0
3
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

MP
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
1
16-30
3
0
31-45
0
4
46-60
2
3
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.84
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
76%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
27%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-46%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
16%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
24%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

SJK Akatemia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.58
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.85
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
23%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

MP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

SJK AkatemiaLigaMP
Average goals in match 1.622.44 2.08
Both teams scored 15%42% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 15%44% 38%
Clean sheets 15%33% 31%
Goal before half-time 54%64% 69%
Goal after half-time 69%73% 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.44
Average goals per match
42%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+24%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SJK AkatemiaYellow cardUssumane Djaló
  2. MPYellow cardVille Laiho
  3. SJK AkatemiaSubstitutionOn: Elari HautamäkiOff: Oskar Pihlaja
  4. MPSubstitutionOn: Milot KastratiOff: Arop Ring
  5. SJK AkatemiaSubstitutionOn: Joonas KekarainenOff: Ussumane Djaló
  6. SJK AkatemiaGoalAbdu MuchipayAssist: Aatu Piiroinen
  7. MPYellow cardTyson Afshari

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: SJK Akatemia 1 - 0 - 0 MP. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of SJK Akatemia vs MP?

The Ykkösliiga match finished SJK Akatemia 1:1 MP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before SJK Akatemia vs MP?

SJK Akatemia score 0.31 goals per game on average and MP 0.92. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.44 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 15% of SJK Akatemia's matches and 38% of MP's.

What form are SJK Akatemia and MP in?

Over the last 5 games SJK Akatemia have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and MP 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJK Akatemia vs MP?

The statistical background for SJK Akatemia vs MP — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.