SJK Akatemia vs PK-35: match statistics
SJK Akatemia vs PK-35: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
SJK Akatemia played PK-35 in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
SJK Akatemia: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match. PK-35: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
SJK Akatemia scores 1.50 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. PK-35 scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 1.92 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: SJK Akatemia 50%, PK-35 50%. Over 2.5: SJK Akatemia 50%, PK-35 50%. League level: BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 42%.
xG, shots and style
PK-35 has higher xG: 1.09 vs 1.01. SJK Akatemia: 6.0 shots per match, PK-35: 8.0.
Match halves
SJK Akatemia: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.00. PK-35: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
SJK Akatemia: 76-90+ (2 goals). PK-35: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 1.92 goals per match, BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 42%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
SJK Akatemia averages 1.00 goal scored and concedes 0.00 goals per home match, with 100% home wins and 100% clean sheets; their home average xG is 0.92 versus xG against 1.95, indicating the defense/goalkeeper significantly outperforms xG expectations. PK-35, the league leader (position 1), has 4 goals for and 2 against this season, and in the last 5 matches has scored 10 and conceded 5 (2.0 scored and 1.0 conceded per match), while SJK in their last 5 have scored 7 and conceded 4 (1.4/0.8 per match). Both teams share the same points average over the last 5 matches — 1.6 points per game — and an identical 2W-2D-1L record, so overall form is balanced. The hosts average 5 shots at home (2 on target) with a conversion rate of 20%, translating to ~1.0 goal per match, and their percentage of home matches without scoring is 0%. Considering home advantage, perfect clean sheets (100%) and lower average goals conceded at home (0.00 vs. 1.0 for the visitors in their last 5), I give SJK Akatemia a small but meaningful edge in this fixture.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assign a 60% probability to BTTS - Yes and 40% to No Goal, because recent signals point to mutual chance creation. Season data for PK-35 are incomplete (seasonal goals average for away = 0 and seasonal BTTS% for away = 0), so I give greater weight to form over the last 5 matches. In the last 5 fixtures PK-35 scored 10 goals (2.0 per match) and conceded 5 (1.0), while SJK scored 7 goals (1.4) and conceded 4 (0.8); the percentage of matches with both teams scoring was 60% for PK-35 and 40% for SJK, which combined yields close to 50% in the short term. Additionally, recent 5-match xG for attacks is 1.19 for both teams combined, with xG against of 1.02 (SJK) and 1.42 (PK-35), meaning both sides create chances (1.19 xG) and PK-35 is more exposed to conceding (1.42 xG against), which raises the likelihood of both teams scoring. Countering this is the league average BTTS of 44% and a high clean sheet rate of 78%, so the BTTS signal is treated as moderate (60% Yes) rather than certain.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate 1.14 xG for the home side (seasonal xG 1.09 and last 5 matches xG 1.19 → approx. 1.14) and 1.19 xG for the visitors (seasonal data missing, so I base it on last 5 matches xG 1.19), giving a total of about 2.33 expected goals. SJK Akatemia scores on average 2.0 goals at home this season and has 7 goals in the last 5 matches (1.4 per match), while PK-35 has scored 10 goals in the last 5 (2.0 per match), so both teams show offensive potential. Defensively SJK concedes 1.0 goal at home on average this season and 0.8 in the last 5, whereas PK-35 concedes around 1.0 in the last 5 with xG against 1.42, suggesting greater defensive vulnerability for the visitors. Additionally, SJK has 60% of matches over 2.5 in the last 5, PK-35 has 40%, and the league averages 2.11 goals per match, so with a combined xG ~2.33 I assign a high probability to Over 1.5 (82%), moderate probability to Over 2.5 (47%) and low probability to Over 3.5 (18%). The strongest signal is Over 1.5 — I choose Over 1.5 as the bet, because the combined expected return of 2.33 and concrete figures (SJK 2.0 goals at home, PK-35 2.0 in last 5) indicate at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
SJK Akatemia averages 2.0 goals per match this season versus 0.0 for PK-35, and scores 1.0 and concedes 0.5 goals on average by half-time, which seasonally puts the home side in a favorable position. The hosts led at the break in 50.0% of their matches this season and collected an average of 2.0 points per game when leading at half-time, whereas PK-35 has 0.0 points in the seasonal data, which despite some ambiguities favors SJK. SJK generates 1.09 xG with 3.5 shots on target and a 25.0% conversion rate, while PK-35 shows 0.0 xG and 0.0 shots in the data, which statistically limits their offense. It should be noted, however, that in the last 5 matches SJK led at the break in only 20.0% and the visitors scored 10 goals by half-time in those five fixtures, which increases the risk of a turnaround. Considering SJK’s seasonal advantage in goals and points, I project the 1/1 Half-Time/Full-Time scenario as the strongest (45%), with smaller chances for half-time win/full-time draw and half-time draw/full-time draw (1/X 10%, X/X 12%) and a low combined probability of an away win across HT/FT outcomes (1/2 + X/2 + 2/2 = 11%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| SJK Akatemia | PK-35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.60 | 0.57 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PK-35 is 33% better for: goals scored per match.
1.5 goals / match - SJK Akatemia · 2 goals / match - PK-35
SJK Akatemia scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while PK-35 keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).
PK-35 scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - SJK Akatemia
Over / Under - PK-35
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
PK-35 is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - SJK Akatemia · 2 pts / match - PK-35
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
SJK Akatemia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
PK-35 - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.50 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.5 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 100% |
| No goal | 50% | 50% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Average goals in match | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 50% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 50% | 50% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
SJK Akatemia
PK-35
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| SJK Akatemia | Liga | PK-35 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.50 | 1.92 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 42% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 42% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 42% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 58% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | • 50% | 50% | • 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): SJK Akatemia 0 - 1 - 2 PK-35. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of SJK Akatemia vs PK-35?
The Ykkösliiga match finished SJK Akatemia 0:1 PK-35. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between SJK Akatemia and PK-35?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches SJK Akatemia won 0, PK-35 won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before SJK Akatemia vs PK-35?
SJK Akatemia score 1.50 goals per game on average and PK-35 2.00. The Ykkösliiga average is 1.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 50% of SJK Akatemia's matches and 50% of PK-35's.
What form are SJK Akatemia and PK-35 in?
Over the last 5 games SJK Akatemia have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and PK-35 1-1-0 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJK Akatemia vs PK-35?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.