Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 23 July 2026

SJK vs Ilves: match statistics

SJK crest
SJK
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Ilves crest
Ilves

SJK vs Ilves: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

SJK play Ilves in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match date is 2 May 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

SJK: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Ilves: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

SJK scores 1.13 and concedes 1.56 goals per match. Ilves scores 1.75 and concedes 1.88. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: SJK 56%, Ilves 69%. Over 2.5: SJK 50%, Ilves 75%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

SJK has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.44. SJK: 13.3 shots per match, Ilves: 11.8.

Match halves

SJK: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.75. Ilves: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.88.

Goals by minute

SJK: 76-90+ (8 goals). Ilves: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

5 H2H matches: 2-3-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

SJK has a clear home advantage: at home they average 2.0 goals per game, 15 shots with 5 on target and an average xG of 1.8, while Ilves away averages 1.67 goals, 9.67 shots (3.33 on target) and xG 1.1. The home defense is markedly more compact — SJK concedes only 0.5 goals per game at home and records 50% clean sheets, whereas Ilves concedes 2.33 goals per game away and has 0% clean sheets. Form confirms SJK’s edge: in the last 5 matches the hosts scored 16 goals and have a 3-1-1 record (averaging 2.0 points per game), while Ilves scored 8 goals and lost 4 of 5 matches, averaging 0.2 points per game. The difference in quality of chances (xG 1.8 vs 1.1) and the higher volume of shots and shots on target (15 vs 9.67 and 5 vs 3.33) favor the hosts in chance creation. Based on this, I back an SJK win.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
SJKIlves
19Shots8
SJKIlves
5Shots on target2
SJKIlves
2.06xG0.91
SJKIlves
10Corners3
SJKIlves
71Dangerous attacks36
SJKIlves
15Fouls7
SJKIlves
1Cards0
SJKIlves

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.13Goals scored / match1.75
SJKIlves
1.56Goals conceded / match1.88
SJKIlves
51%Average possession49%
SJKIlves
4.75Shots on target / match4.94
SJKIlves

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.25Shots per match11.75
SJKIlves
4.75Shots on target4.94
SJKIlves
8.5%Shot conversion14.9%
SJKIlves
51%Possession49%
SJKIlves
1.58xG for1.44
SJKIlves
1.49xG against1.63
SJKIlves

Shooting quality

SJK: BalancedIlves: Efficient finishing
SJKIlves
Accuracy (shots on target)36%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ilves is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - SJK · 1.4 pts / match - Ilves

SJK
DDWLL
Season result split
19% W31% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-5-8
0.88 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-4
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Ilves
WLDLW
Season result split
31% W25% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-7
1.19 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 2.14Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ilves is 55% better for: goals scored per match.

1.13 goals / match - SJK · 1.75 goals / match - Ilves

SJK is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.56 goals / match - SJK · 1.88 goals / match - Ilves

SJK scoring profile: strong

SJK scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while Ilves keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).

Ilves scoring profile: very strong

Ilves scores in 94% of matches (15 of 16 matches), while SJK keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).

18Goals scored (season)28
SJKIlves
25Goals conceded (season)30
SJKIlves
2.69Average goals in match3.63
SJKIlves
6Goals scored (last 5)14
SJKIlves
7Goals conceded (last 5)9
SJKIlves

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal94%
SJKIlves
31%2 goals50%
SJKIlves
19%3 goals19%
SJKIlves
0%4 goals6%
SJKIlves

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal75%
SJKIlves
50%2 goals63%
SJKIlves
19%3 goals31%
SJKIlves
0%4 goals13%
SJKIlves

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time31%
SJKIlves
13%BTTS in both halves13%
SJKIlves
25%Scored in both halves38%
SJKIlves

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS63%
SJKIlves
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
SJKIlves
60%BTTS - last 580%
SJKIlves

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time88%
SJKIlves
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time63%
SJKIlves
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time38%
SJKIlves

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time94%
SJKIlves
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
SJKIlves
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
SJKIlves

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ilves is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.06 pts / match - SJK · 1.38 pts / match - Ilves

SJK - half-time state
25% leading31% draw44% trailing
Ilves - half-time state
38% leading25% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.06Points per match (1st half)1.38
SJKIlves
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.88
SJKIlves
0.69Goals conceded (1st half)1.19
SJKIlves
1.06Average goals (1st half)2.06
SJKIlves
44%Clean sheet before half-time44%
SJKIlves
63%No goal before half-time38%
SJKIlves

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per match (2nd half)1.63
SJKIlves
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
SJKIlves
0.88Goals conceded (2nd half)0.69
SJKIlves
1.63Average goals (2nd half)1.56
SJKIlves
38%Clean sheet after half-time50%
SJKIlves
50%No goal after half-time31%
SJKIlves

SJK - second-half results

31% W31% R38% P
17
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding76%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 19%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ilves - second-half results

44% W31% R25% P
22
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 31%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

SJK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Ilves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.60
Goals scored / match1.41.4
Goals conceded / match1.40.4
Average goals in match2.81.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

SJK
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
1
3
16-30
4
3
31-45
2
12
46-60
2
0
61-75
8
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Ilves
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
6
5
16-30
4
9
31-45
5
4
46-60
4
2
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.16
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
118%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

SJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
136%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
44% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
44%

Ilves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
152%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

SJKLigaIlves
Average goals in match 2.692.67 3.63
Both teams scored 56%51% 69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%47% 75%
Clean sheets 13%28% 25%
Goal before half-time 81%75% 88%
Goal after half-time 81%78% 94%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+25%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): SJK 2 - 3 - 0 Ilves. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Ilves
2 : 2
SJK
Tampereen Ilves
3 : 3
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho
2 : 1
Tampereen Ilves
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho
1 : 1
Tampereen Ilves
Tampereen Ilves
2 : 3
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho

FAQ

What was the result of SJK vs Ilves?

The Veikkausliiga match finished SJK 1:1 Ilves. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between SJK and Ilves?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches SJK won 2, Ilves won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before SJK vs Ilves?

SJK score 1.13 goals per game on average and Ilves 1.75. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 56% of SJK's matches and 69% of Ilves's.

What form are SJK and Ilves in?

Over the last 5 games SJK have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Ilves 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJK vs Ilves?

The statistical background for SJK vs Ilves — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.