Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 06 September 2026

SJK vs Ilves: match statistics

SJK crest
SJK
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Ilves crest
Ilves

SJK vs Ilves: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

SJK played Ilves in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

SJK: 1-1-2, 1.00 points/match. Ilves: 0-1-3, 0.25 points/match.

Goal statistics

SJK scores 1.00 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Ilves scores 1.50 and concedes 2.50. League average: 2.42 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: SJK 25%, Ilves 100%. Over 2.5: SJK 50%, Ilves 100%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

SJK has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.26. SJK: 11.5 shots per match, Ilves: 10.8.

Match halves

SJK: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.75. Ilves: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

SJK: 46-60 (2 goals). Ilves: 16-30 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.42 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-2-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

SJK has a clear home advantage: at home they average 2.0 goals per game, 15 shots with 5 on target and an average xG of 1.8, while Ilves away averages 1.67 goals, 9.67 shots (3.33 on target) and xG 1.1. The home defense is markedly more compact — SJK concedes only 0.5 goals per game at home and records 50% clean sheets, whereas Ilves concedes 2.33 goals per game away and has 0% clean sheets. Form confirms SJK’s edge: in the last 5 matches the hosts scored 16 goals and have a 3-1-1 record (averaging 2.0 points per game), while Ilves scored 8 goals and lost 4 of 5 matches, averaging 0.2 points per game. The difference in quality of chances (xG 1.8 vs 1.1) and the higher volume of shots and shots on target (15 vs 9.67 and 5 vs 3.33) favor the hosts in chance creation. Based on this, I back an SJK win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have season BTTS at 100% (SJK 100% and Ilves 100%), versus a league average BTTS of 54%, providing a strong signal for both teams to score. SJK averages 3.2 goals in the last 5 matches (16 goals in 5) with recent xG 2.29, while Ilves averages 1.6 goals (8 goals) with xG 1.21, so the home side is creating significantly more chances. Seasonally SJK concedes 3.0 goals on average, Ilves 2.33, and Ilves conceded 13 goals in the last 5 (2.6 avg), which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Additionally SJK averages 14.0 shots and 5.0 on target versus Ilves 9.67 and 3.33, with Ilves conversion 17% vs SJK 7%, so even with fewer opportunities Ilves displays higher efficiency. Considering 100% seasonal BTTS, 100% of matches over 2.5 for both, and form and xG, I tip BTTS - Yes as most likely (approx. 90% vs 10%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The combined expected goals from the last 5 matches are 2.29 (SJK) + 1.21 (Ilves) = 3.50 xG, and SJK scored 16 goals in those 5 games (avg 3.2) while Ilves scored 8 (avg 1.6) and conceded 13 (avg 2.6). Both teams have 100% of this season’s matches with both teams scoring (BTTS 100%) and 100% of matches over 2.5 goals, which strongly supports the over market. SJK generates more chances (avg 14 shots and 5 on target per match vs 9.67 and 3.33 for Ilves) and has a higher season xG (1.74 vs 1.10), while Ilves compensates with higher finishing efficiency (17% vs 7%), so even with fewer shots they can still convert. The league averages 2.42 goals per match, and our expected 3.50 goals is materially above that, increasing the probability of Over 2.5 goals and also providing a reasonable chance for Over 3.5. Considering the combined xG of 3.50, season-long Over 2.5 and BTTS rates, and SJK’s form, the strongest data-backed play is Over 2.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I back 1/1 because SJK led at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches (60%) and also has a 60% win rate in those five games, whereas Ilves has 0% wins in the last 5 and led at the break in only 1 of 5 (20%). SJK posts a higher home xG of 1.74 versus Ilves’s 1.10 and averages 14 shots (5 on target) compared to Ilves’s 9.67 shots (3.33 on target), indicating superior chance creation and goal opportunities before half-time. In the last 5 matches hosts averaged 2.0 goals by half-time versus Ilves’s 0.8, and Ilves concedes an average of 1.6 goals by half-time, all of which increases the likelihood of SJK leading after 45 minutes. Although both teams have a season-long BTTS of 100% (both score in every match), SJK’s HT form, higher xG and shot superiority make 1/1 the strongest signal.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
SJKIlves
19Shots8
SJKIlves
5Shots on target2
SJKIlves
2.06xG0.91
SJKIlves
10Corners3
SJKIlves
71Dangerous attacks36
SJKIlves
15Fouls7
SJKIlves
1Cards0
SJKIlves

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match1.5
SJKIlves
1.5Goals conceded / match2.5
SJKIlves
54%Average possession50%
SJKIlves
4.25Shots on target / match3.75
SJKIlves

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.5Shots per match10.75
SJKIlves
4.25Shots on target3.75
SJKIlves
8.7%Shot conversion14%
SJKIlves
54%Possession50%
SJKIlves
1.49xG for1.26
SJKIlves
1.44xG against1.74
SJKIlves

Shooting quality

SJK: BalancedIlves: Efficient finishing
SJKIlves
Accuracy (shots on target)37%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

SJK is 300% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - SJK · 0.25 pts / match - Ilves

SJK
LWLD
Season result split
25% W25% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 at home
1-1-0
WD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 50%
Ilves
LLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W25% R75% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-3
0.25 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-3
0.25 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-2
Last 5 away
0-1-2
LDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 2.5xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ilves is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - SJK · 1.5 goals / match - Ilves

SJK is 67% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - SJK · 2.5 goals / match - Ilves

SJK scoring profile: very strong

SJK scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while Ilves keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).

Ilves scoring profile: very strong

Ilves scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while SJK keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

4Goals scored (season)6
SJKIlves
6Goals conceded (season)10
SJKIlves
2.5Average goals in match4
SJKIlves
4Goals scored (last 5)6
SJKIlves
6Goals conceded (last 5)10
SJKIlves

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal100%
SJKIlves
25%2 goals50%
SJKIlves
25%3 goals0%
SJKIlves
0%4 goals0%
SJKIlves

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal100%
SJKIlves
50%2 goals100%
SJKIlves
25%3 goals50%
SJKIlves
0%4 goals0%
SJKIlves

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time25%
SJKIlves
0%BTTS in both halves25%
SJKIlves
25%Scored in both halves25%
SJKIlves

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
SJKIlves
50%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
SJKIlves
25%BTTS - last 5100%
SJKIlves

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
SJKIlves
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time75%
SJKIlves
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
SJKIlves

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
SJKIlves
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
SJKIlves
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
SJKIlves

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ilves is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.75 pts / match - SJK · 1 pts / match - Ilves

SJK - half-time state
25% leading0% draw75% trailing
Ilves - half-time state
25% leading25% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.75Points per match (1st half)1
SJKIlves
0.25Goals scored (1st half)0.5
SJKIlves
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)1.5
SJKIlves
1Average goals (1st half)2
SJKIlves
25%Clean sheet before half-time25%
SJKIlves
75%No goal before half-time50%
SJKIlves

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)1.25
SJKIlves
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)1
SJKIlves
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)1
SJKIlves
1.5Average goals (2nd half)2
SJKIlves
50%Clean sheet after half-time25%
SJKIlves
50%No goal after half-time25%
SJKIlves

SJK - second-half results

50% W0% R50% P
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ilves - second-half results

25% W50% R25% P
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

SJK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.751.50
Goals scored / match0.30.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.01.5
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet25%50%
No goal75%50%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 25% leading - 0% draw - 75% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Ilves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.25
Goals scored / match0.51.0
Goals conceded / match1.51.0
Average goals in match2.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals75%100%
3 goals25%0%
Clean sheet25%25%
No goal50%25%
Goal difference-40
Half-time: 25% leading - 25% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 50% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

SJK
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
2
2
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Ilves
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
2
1
16-30
0
3
31-45
1
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
134%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

SJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Ilves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.76
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
197%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

SJKLigaIlves
Average goals in match 2.502.42 4.00
Both teams scored 25%54% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%42% 100%
Clean sheets 25%27% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%73% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%81% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.42
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.27
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SJKSubstitutionOn: Aapo BoströmOff: Oskari Väistö
  2. SJKYellow cardArmaan Wilson
  3. IlvesSubstitutionOn: Oskari Tapio PaavolaOff: Teemu Hytönen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): SJK 2 - 2 - 0 Ilves. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Tampereen Ilves
3 : 3
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho
2 : 1
Tampereen Ilves
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho
1 : 1
Tampereen Ilves
Tampereen Ilves
2 : 3
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho

FAQ

What was the result of SJK vs Ilves?

The Veikkausliiga match finished SJK 1:1 Ilves. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between SJK and Ilves?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches SJK won 2, Ilves won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before SJK vs Ilves?

SJK score 1.00 goals per game on average and Ilves 1.50. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.42 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 25% of SJK's matches and 100% of Ilves's.

What form are SJK and Ilves in?

Over the last 5 games SJK have a 1-1-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Ilves 0-1-3 (0.25 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJK vs Ilves?

The statistical background for SJK vs Ilves — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.