Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 07 September 2026

SJK vs Jaro: match statistics

SJK crest
SJK
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Jaro crest
Jaro

SJK vs Jaro: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

SJK played Jaro in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 24 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

SJK: 1-0-2, 1.00 points/match. Jaro: 0-2-1, 0.67 points/match.

Goal statistics

SJK scores 1.00 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Jaro scores 0.33 and concedes 0.67. League average: 2.52 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: SJK 0%, Jaro 33%. Over 2.5: SJK 67%, Jaro 0%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Jaro has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.48. SJK: 11.3 shots per match, Jaro: 12.0.

Match halves

SJK: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67. Jaro: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

SJK: 16-30 (1 goals). Jaro: 31-45+ (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.52 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

SJK averages 3.0 goals per home match and concedes 0.0, boasting 100% home wins and 100% clean sheets; their home xG is 2.09 with 18 shots and 6 on target, equating to a 17% conversion. Jaro away averages 0.0 goals scored and 100% of matches without scoring, despite generating xG 2.11 with 19 shots and 6 on target, indicating marked inefficiency (0% conversion). In the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 9 and conceded 12 (2 wins, 3 losses), while the visitors have scored 7 and conceded 6 (2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss), yielding 1.2 points per game for SJK and 1.6 for Jaro in that period. SJK’s key advantage is finishing chances and a stable home defense (xG against 0.57 vs Jaro away xG against 1.03), whereas Jaro create opportunities but fail to convert them. Based on this, I forecast a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes. SJK in the last 5 matches scored 9 goals (avg 1.8) and conceded 12 goals (avg 2.4), indicating high vulnerability to conceding while still capable of scoring. Jaro in the last 5 matches scored 7 goals (avg 1.4) and has away season xG 2.11 with an average of 19 shots and 6 on target per game, meaning they generate real goalscoring opportunities. Despite seasonal divergence (SJK season BTTS 50% vs Jaro season BTTS 0% and 100% clean sheets), recent form numbers and higher xG for Jaro suggest both teams are likely to score. Therefore I assess BTTS risk at roughly 65% for Yes and 35% for No, which is clearly above the league average BTTS 42%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG analysis shows SJK has xG_for 1.20 and Jaro 2.11; comparing with xG_against (SJK 1.04, Jaro 1.03) yields expected goals: SJK 1.12 and Jaro 1.58, total 2.70. With lambda = 2.70 the Poisson model gives probability of Over 1.5 goals at ~75%, Over 2.5 at ~51% and Over 3.5 at ~29%. Additionally, in their last 5 matches SJK games averaged 4.2 goals per game (9 scored and 12 conceded), while Jaro averages 19 shots and 6 on target per game, which reinforces the minimum-two-goal scenario. Considering the home xG 1.12, away xG 1.58, SJK’s weaker defense (2.4 goals conceded on average in the last 5) and Jaro’s high shot potential, the strongest and most reliable signal is a bet on Over 1.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X). Away side Jaro drew in 100.0% of their season matches (drawPercentage_away = 100.0) and were level at the break in 100.0% of matches (drawingAtHTPercentage_away = 100.0), while home side SJK have 50.0% of matches ending in a draw (drawPercentage_home = 50.0), which strongly favors a draw as the final result. Although Jaro produce higher xG and more shots — xG 2.11 versus 1.20 for SJK and on average 19.0 shots versus 8.5 — their seasonal goals scored is 0.0 (seasonScoredAVG_away = 0.0) with a shot conversion rate of 0.0 (shot_conversion_rate_away = 0.0), and a clean sheet percentage of 100.0% (seasonCSPercentage_away = 100.0), suggesting the xG advantage is not converting into wins. SJK score an average of 0.5 goals by half-time (scoredAVGHT_home = 0.5) and led at the break in 50.0% of matches (leadingAtHTPercentage_home = 50.0), so the half-time result is likely to be low-scoring (0:0 or 1:1). Based on this I allocated 45% to X/X, 20% to X/2 (draw at half-time, Jaro turnaround to win due to higher xG) and smaller shares to the remaining scenarios.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
SJKJaro
12Shots14
SJKJaro
4Shots on target7
SJKJaro
1.51xG1.66
SJKJaro
1Corners3
SJKJaro
64Dangerous attacks39
SJKJaro
6Fouls9
SJKJaro
1Cards1
SJKJaro

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match0.33
SJKJaro
1.67Goals conceded / match0.67
SJKJaro
52%Average possession47%
SJKJaro
4.33Shots on target / match4.33
SJKJaro

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.33Shots per match12
SJKJaro
4.33Shots on target4.33
SJKJaro
8.8%Shot conversion2.8%
SJKJaro
52%Possession47%
SJKJaro
1.48xG for1.5
SJKJaro
1.36xG against1.04
SJKJaro

Shooting quality

SJK: BalancedJaro: Balanced
SJKJaro
Accuracy (shots on target)38%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.08

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

SJK is 49% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - SJK · 0.67 pts / match - Jaro

SJK
LWL
Season result split
33% W0% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.7xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 67%
Jaro
LDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W67% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-1
0.67 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-1
0.67 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.3Goals conceded: 0.7xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.04BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

SJK is 203% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - SJK · 0.33 goals / match - Jaro

Jaro is 149% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.67 goals / match - SJK · 0.67 goals / match - Jaro

SJK scoring profile: mixed

SJK scores in 33% of matches (1 of 3 matches), while Jaro keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

Jaro scoring profile: mixed

Jaro scores in 33% of matches (1 of 3 matches), while SJK keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).

3Goals scored (season)1
SJKJaro
5Goals conceded (season)2
SJKJaro
2.67Average goals in match1
SJKJaro
3Goals scored (last 5)1
SJKJaro
5Goals conceded (last 5)2
SJKJaro

How often they score at least...

33%1 goal33%
SJKJaro
33%2 goals0%
SJKJaro
33%3 goals0%
SJKJaro
0%4 goals0%
SJKJaro

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal67%
SJKJaro
67%2 goals0%
SJKJaro
33%3 goals0%
SJKJaro
0%4 goals0%
SJKJaro

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
SJKJaro
0%BTTS in both halves0%
SJKJaro
33%Scored in both halves0%
SJKJaro

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
SJKJaro
67%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
SJKJaro
0%BTTS - last 533%
SJKJaro

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
SJKJaro
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
SJKJaro
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
SJKJaro

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time33%
SJKJaro
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
SJKJaro
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
SJKJaro

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Jaro is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - SJK · 1.33 pts / match - Jaro

SJK - half-time state
33% leading0% draw67% trailing
Jaro - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.33
SJKJaro
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.33
SJKJaro
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
SJKJaro
1Average goals (1st half)0.67
SJKJaro
33%Clean sheet before half-time67%
SJKJaro
67%No goal before half-time67%
SJKJaro

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)0.67
SJKJaro
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0
SJKJaro
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
SJKJaro
1.67Average goals (2nd half)0.33
SJKJaro
33%Clean sheet after half-time67%
SJKJaro
67%No goal after half-time100%
SJKJaro

SJK - second-half results

33% W0% R67% P
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Jaro - second-half results

0% W67% R33% P
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

SJK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.30.7
Goals conceded / match0.71.0
Average goals in match1.01.7
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%67%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet33%33%
No goal67%67%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 33% leading - 0% draw - 67% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 0% draw - 67% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Jaro - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.330.67
Goals scored / match0.30.0
Goals conceded / match0.30.3
Average goals in match0.70.3
1 goal67%33%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet67%67%
No goal67%100%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 33% leading - 33% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 67% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

SJK
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
2
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Jaro
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
73%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
17%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+118%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
11%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
45%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 2 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

SJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.79
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Jaro

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.80
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
27%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
52%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

SJKLigaJaro
Average goals in match 2.672.52 1.00
Both teams scored 0%48% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%48% 0%
Clean sheets 33%31% 33%
Goal before half-time 100%71% 67%
Goal after half-time 100%81% 33%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.52
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / match
1.24
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JaroYellow cardJim Myrevik
  2. SJKYellow cardKelvin Spencer Pires
  3. JaroSubstitutionOn: Adam VidjeskogOff: Luca Weckström
  4. JaroSubstitutionOn: Kaius HardénOff: Herman Sjögrell

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): SJK 2 - 0 - 0 Jaro. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FF Jaro
0 : 4
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho
3 : 1
FF Jaro

FAQ

What was the result of SJK vs Jaro?

The Veikkausliiga match finished SJK 1:1 Jaro. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between SJK and Jaro?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches SJK won 2, Jaro won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before SJK vs Jaro?

SJK score 1.00 goals per game on average and Jaro 0.33. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 0% of SJK's matches and 33% of Jaro's.

What form are SJK and Jaro in?

Over the last 5 games SJK have a 1-0-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Jaro 0-2-1 (0.67 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJK vs Jaro?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for SJK vs Jaro: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.