Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 23 July 2026

Skanste vs Riga FC II: match statistics

Skanste crest
Skanste
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Riga FC II crest
Riga FC II

Skanste vs Riga FC II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Skanste play Riga FC II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 4 May 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Skanste: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Riga FC II: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Skanste scores 1.54 and concedes 2.08 goals per match. Riga FC II scores 1.62 and concedes 1.77. League average: 3.43 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Skanste 46%, Riga FC II 62%. Over 2.5: Skanste 69%, Riga FC II 69%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

xG, shots and style

Skanste has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.36. Skanste: 9.8 shots per match, Riga FC II: 8.2.

Match halves

Skanste: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.92. Riga FC II: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.69.

Goals by minute

Skanste: 46-60 (8 goals). Riga FC II: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 2-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Skanste has a clear advantage in chance creation: at home they average 11.5 shots and 2.5 on target per match with an average xG of 1.37, while Riga FC II away record is only 6 shots and xG 0.90. The visitors, however, are efficient — their shot conversion is 17% versus 9% for the hosts and they average 3.5 shots on target per match, but that efficiency stems from a lower volume of chances. Defensively Skanste concedes on average 1.5 goals at home, and Riga concedes 2.0 goals away; average xG against is 1.44 for Skanste and 2.04 for Riga, which indicates greater vulnerability from the visitors. In the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 8 goals and recorded 1 win (form llwdl, averaging 0.8 points per match), while the visitors have scored 9 goals and 2 wins (llwdw, averaging 1.4 points per match); both teams conceded 10 goals in that period. Considering the higher chance volume, superior xG and the fact Skanste have not had a goalless home game (0% such matches) versus Riga’s 50% of away matches without a goal, I predict a home victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
SkansteRiga FC II
11Shots10
SkansteRiga FC II
5Shots on target4
SkansteRiga FC II
1.38xG1.46
SkansteRiga FC II
5Corners12
SkansteRiga FC II
47Dangerous attacks74
SkansteRiga FC II
-1Fouls-1
SkansteRiga FC II
-1Cards-1
SkansteRiga FC II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.54Goals scored / match1.62
SkansteRiga FC II
2.08Goals conceded / match1.77
SkansteRiga FC II
40%Average possession45%
SkansteRiga FC II
4.31Shots on target / match4.62
SkansteRiga FC II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.85Shots per match8.23
SkansteRiga FC II
4.31Shots on target4.62
SkansteRiga FC II
15.6%Shot conversion19.6%
SkansteRiga FC II
40%Possession45%
SkansteRiga FC II
1.44xG for1.36
SkansteRiga FC II
1.73xG against1.68
SkansteRiga FC II

Shooting quality

Skanste: Counter-attackingRiga FC II: Counter-attacking
SkansteRiga FC II
Accuracy (shots on target)44%56%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Riga FC II is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Skanste · 2.4 pts / match - Riga FC II

Skanste
LWLLL
Season result split
31% W8% R62% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-8
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
WWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Riga FC II
LWWWW
Season result split
46% W8% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-6
1.46 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-4
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 0.60BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Riga FC II is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1.54 goals / match - Skanste · 1.62 goals / match - Riga FC II

Riga FC II is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.08 goals / match - Skanste · 1.77 goals / match - Riga FC II

Skanste scoring profile: very strong

Skanste scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while Riga FC II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

Riga FC II scoring profile: very strong

Riga FC II scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Skanste keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

20Goals scored (season)21
SkansteRiga FC II
27Goals conceded (season)23
SkansteRiga FC II
3.62Average goals in match3.38
SkansteRiga FC II
5Goals scored (last 5)10
SkansteRiga FC II
13Goals conceded (last 5)4
SkansteRiga FC II

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal77%
SkansteRiga FC II
31%2 goals62%
SkansteRiga FC II
23%3 goals15%
SkansteRiga FC II
23%4 goals8%
SkansteRiga FC II

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal85%
SkansteRiga FC II
69%2 goals62%
SkansteRiga FC II
38%3 goals23%
SkansteRiga FC II
15%4 goals8%
SkansteRiga FC II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time38%
SkansteRiga FC II
0%BTTS in both halves0%
SkansteRiga FC II
8%Scored in both halves38%
SkansteRiga FC II

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS62%
SkansteRiga FC II
31%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
SkansteRiga FC II
40%BTTS - last 560%
SkansteRiga FC II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
SkansteRiga FC II
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
SkansteRiga FC II
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time31%
SkansteRiga FC II

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
SkansteRiga FC II
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time62%
SkansteRiga FC II
38%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
SkansteRiga FC II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga FC II is 185% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.54 pts / match - Skanste · 1.54 pts / match - Riga FC II

Skanste - half-time state
8% leading31% draw62% trailing
Riga FC II - half-time state
38% leading38% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.54Points per match (1st half)1.54
SkansteRiga FC II
0.15Goals scored (1st half)0.92
SkansteRiga FC II
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
SkansteRiga FC II
1.15Average goals (1st half)1.54
SkansteRiga FC II
31%Clean sheet before half-time46%
SkansteRiga FC II
85%No goal before half-time38%
SkansteRiga FC II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.15Points per match (2nd half)1.15
SkansteRiga FC II
0.92Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
SkansteRiga FC II
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.15
SkansteRiga FC II
1.92Average goals (2nd half)1.85
SkansteRiga FC II
46%Clean sheet after half-time46%
SkansteRiga FC II
54%No goal after half-time46%
SkansteRiga FC II

Skanste - second-half results

31% W23% R46% P
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding388%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Riga FC II - second-half results

31% W23% R46% P
20
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Skanste - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match1.41.2
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-6-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Riga FC II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.20
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Skanste
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
1
3
16-30
1
8
31-45
8
5
46-60
2
2
61-75
2
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Riga FC II
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
5
4
16-30
3
3
31-45
3
4
46-60
3
1
61-75
3
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-71%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Skanste

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

Riga FC II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.94
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

SkansteLigaRiga FC II
Average goals in match 3.623.43 3.38
Both teams scored 46%60% 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 69%68% 69%
Clean sheets 15%23% 15%
Goal before half-time 77%71% 77%
Goal after half-time 77%84% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.43
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.60
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Skanste 2 - 0 - 0 Riga FC II. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Skanstes SK
1 : 0
Riga FC II
Riga FC II
0 : 1
Skanstes SK

FAQ

What was the result of Skanste vs Riga FC II?

The 1. Liga match finished Skanste 2:0 Riga FC II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Skanste and Riga FC II?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Skanste won 2, Riga FC II won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Skanste vs Riga FC II?

Skanste score 1.54 goals per game on average and Riga FC II 1.62. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Skanste's matches and 62% of Riga FC II's.

What form are Skanste and Riga FC II in?

Over the last 5 games Skanste have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Riga FC II 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Skanste vs Riga FC II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.