Slatina vs CSM Iaşi: match statistics
Slatina vs CSM Iaşi: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Slatina played CSM Iaşi in Liga II (Romania). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Slatina: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. CSM Iaşi: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Slatina scores 1.44 and concedes 1.19 goals per match. CSM Iaşi scores 1.19 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.69 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Slatina 63%, CSM Iaşi 33%. Over 2.5: Slatina 52%, CSM Iaşi 37%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Slatina has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.56. Slatina: 12.8 shots per match, CSM Iaşi: 12.3.
Match halves
Slatina: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.89. CSM Iaşi: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.81.
Goals by minute
Slatina: 76-90+ (12 goals). CSM Iaşi: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga II: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Slatina holds a clear advantage in home metrics: they score on average 1.08 goals per home game with an average xG of 1.5 and concede only 0.85 goals per match, whereas CSM Iaşi produce just 0.5 goals per away match with an xG of 1.44 and concede 1.5 goals. The quality differential is evident — Slatina averages 13.92 shots and 4.46 on target at home with an 8% conversion rate, while Iaşi on the road record 11.83 shots, 3.58 on target and a mere 4% conversion. Additionally, the visitors fail to score in 58% of their away trips, compared to the hosts failing to score in only 38% of home matches; Slatina also has more clean sheets (38% vs 25%) and a positive home goal difference (+3 vs Iaşi’s -12 away). Recent form over the last five matches favors the visitors on points (Iaşi 4 wins and 1 draw, averaging 2.6 points per match; Slatina 3 wins and 2 draws, averaging 2.2 points), but both sides have scored 10 goals in their last five games. Considering Slatina’s superior defense (0.85 conceded at home vs 1.5 conceded by Iaşi away), higher conversion efficiency (8% vs 4%) and the home xG edge (1.5 vs 1.44), I back a Slatina victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The “No” scenario is more likely: Slatina concedes an average of 0.6 goals per match and has 47% clean sheets, while CSM Iaşi scores only 0.5 goals on average and posts a very low shot conversion of 4%, indicating the visitors’ finishing issues. On the other hand xG shows both teams create chances (Slatina xG 1.67, CSM Iaşi xG 1.44) and over the last 5 matches both sides averaged 2.0 goals each, which provides short-term support for BTTS (recent 5: Slatina BTTS 60%, CSM 40%). However, seasonal BTTS rates are low: Slatina 40% and CSM 25%, and the league BTTS is 49% with a high clean sheet rate of 57%, favoring No Goal. Additionally, Slatina averages 5.57 shots on target versus the visitors’ 3.58 and has higher shooting efficiency (conversion 13% vs 4%), suggesting the home side more often decides matches without conceding. In light of the above figures I assess BTTS probability at 35% (Yes) and 65% (No).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Slatina averages 1.73 goals and has xG 1.67 with 5.57 shots on target per match, while CSM Iaşi actually scores 0.50 goals despite xG 1.44 and a very low conversion rate of 4%, indicating the visitors are wasting created chances. Both teams have a high share of matches over 1.5 goals: 67% for Slatina and 58% for Iaşi, and the league goals average is 2.69, which further favors Over 1.5. My estimate is 1.73 goals for the home side and 0.87 for the visitors, total 2.60 goals, so the 1.5 line has a clear edge while the 2.5 line is only slightly favored. Season Over 2.5 percentages are 40% (Slatina) and 33% (Iaşi), but Slatina’s last 5 matches have Over 2.5 in 60% of cases, so Over 2.5 is possible but risky. In summary, I recommend playing Over on the 1.5 line: the high frequency >1.5 (67% and 58%), the projected 2.60 goals and the home advantage in shots on target and conversion (5.57 and 13% vs 3.58 and 4%) justify this choice.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Slatina has a clear statistical advantage: they average 1.73 goals per match versus 0.50 for CSM Iaşi and collect 2.07 points per match compared to 0.83 for the visitors, with a 60% home win rate versus 25% for the away side. At Half-Time the hosts led in 6 of 15 matches (40%), and their average first-half goals is 0.53 versus 0.17 for the visitors; the visitors, conversely, did not lead at the break in their 12 matches (0%). Slatina records an average of 5.57 shots on target against 3.58 for the visitors, has an xG of 1.67 vs 1.44 and a shot conversion rate of 13% versus 4%, indicating more chances and higher efficiency for the hosts. In the second half the hosts score on average 1.2 goals (vs 0.33 for the visitors) and score particularly frequently in the 76th–90th minute (11 goals), so a draw or a lead at the break often turns into a Slatina victory. On this basis I assign the highest probability to the 1/1 Half-Time/Full-Time scenario (44%), with the next strongest signal being X/1 (18%), hence the recommendation to bet 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Slatina | CSM Iaşi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Slatina is 57% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Slatina · 1.4 pts / match - CSM Iaşi
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Slatina is 21% better for: goals scored per match.
1.44 goals / match - Slatina · 1.19 goals / match - CSM Iaşi
CSM Iaşi is 19% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.19 goals / match - Slatina · 1 goals / match - CSM Iaşi
Slatina scores in 74% of matches (20 of 27 matches), while CSM Iaşi keeps a clean sheet in 37% (10 of 27 matches).
CSM Iaşi scores in 63% of matches (17 of 27 matches), while Slatina keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Slatina
Over / Under - CSM Iaşi
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Slatina is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.3 pts / match - Slatina · 1.11 pts / match - CSM Iaşi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Slatina - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
CSM Iaşi - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Slatina
CSM Iaşi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).
Teams vs league
| Slatina | Liga | CSM Iaşi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.63 | 2.69 | ▼ 2.19 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 49% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 52% | 49% | ▼ 37% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 29% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 72% | ▼ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 82% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- CSM IaşiYellow cardMatei Cuciureanu
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Slatina 0 - 1 - 0 CSM Iaşi. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Slatina vs CSM Iaşi?
The Liga II match finished Slatina 1:0 CSM Iaşi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Slatina vs CSM Iaşi?
Slatina score 1.44 goals per game on average and CSM Iaşi 1.19. The Liga II average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Slatina's matches and 33% of CSM Iaşi's.
What form are Slatina and CSM Iaşi in?
Over the last 5 games Slatina have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and CSM Iaşi 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Slatina vs CSM Iaşi?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Slatina vs CSM Iaşi: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


