Kenya - Kenyan Premier LeagueData current as of 06 September 2026

Sofapaka vs Leopards: match statistics

Sofapaka crest
Sofapaka
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Leopards crest
Leopards
120%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
250%(0.00)

Leopards present significantly better form than Sofapaka, confirmed by recent results – the visitors have earned 2.2 points per match in their last 5 games, compared to just 0.4 for the hosts. Sofapaka has poor efficiency at home – only 13% wins in home matches and a staggering 63% of games without scoring a goal. Leopards stand out with a solid away defense (0.86 goals conceded on average) and 43% clean sheets, and have not lost any of their last 5 matches. The hosts' goal difference stands at -5 in home matches, while the visitors hold a positive +1 balance on the road. Considering Leopards' possession advantage (53% vs 47%), their superior form, and Sofapaka's offensive weakness, a victory for the visitors or a draw is most probable, with the edge going to Leopards.

Sofapaka vs Leopards: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sofapaka played Leopards in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The match was played on 28 January 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Sofapaka: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Leopards: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sofapaka scores 0.67 and concedes 1.22 goals per match. Leopards scores 1.28 and concedes 0.61. League average: 1.99 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sofapaka 28%, Leopards 39%. Over 2.5: Sofapaka 28%, Leopards 33%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.

xG, shots and style

Sofapaka has higher xG: 1.31 vs 1.28. Sofapaka: 8.8 shots per match, Leopards: 7.7.

Match halves

Sofapaka: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.28. Leopards: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Sofapaka: 0-15 (4 goals). Leopards: 0-15 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kenyan Premier League: 1.99 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Leopards present significantly better form than Sofapaka, confirmed by recent results – the visitors have earned 2.2 points per match in their last 5 games, compared to just 0.4 for the hosts. Sofapaka has poor efficiency at home – only 13% wins in home matches and a staggering 63% of games without scoring a goal. Leopards stand out with a solid away defense (0.86 goals conceded on average) and 43% clean sheets, and have not lost any of their last 5 matches. The hosts' goal difference stands at -5 in home matches, while the visitors hold a positive +1 balance on the road. Considering Leopards' possession advantage (53% vs 47%), their superior form, and Sofapaka's offensive weakness, a victory for the visitors or a draw is most probable, with the edge going to Leopards.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
SofapakaLeopards
14Shots19
SofapakaLeopards
7Shots on target9
SofapakaLeopards
1.96xG2.64
SofapakaLeopards
7Corners16
SofapakaLeopards
82Dangerous attacks114
SofapakaLeopards
-1Fouls-1
SofapakaLeopards
-1Cards-1
SofapakaLeopards

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.67Goals scored / match1.28
SofapakaLeopards
1.22Goals conceded / match0.61
SofapakaLeopards
45%Average possession45%
SofapakaLeopards
3.28Shots on target / match2.44
SofapakaLeopards

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.78Shots per match7.67
SofapakaLeopards
3.28Shots on target2.44
SofapakaLeopards
7.6%Shot conversion16.7%
SofapakaLeopards
45%Possession45%
SofapakaLeopards
1.31xG for1.28
SofapakaLeopards
1.47xG against1.19
SofapakaLeopards

Shooting quality

Sofapaka: BalancedLeopards: Counter-attacking
SofapakaLeopards
Accuracy (shots on target)37%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.200.52

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Leopards is 650% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Sofapaka · 3 pts / match - Leopards

Sofapaka
LDDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W28% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-5-10
0.78 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-4-4
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
LDLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.02Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Leopards
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
56% W33% R11% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-6-2
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-1
Last 5 away
3-2-0
DWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 0.98BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Leopards is 91% better for: goals scored per match.

0.67 goals / match - Sofapaka · 1.28 goals / match - Leopards

Leopards is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.22 goals / match - Sofapaka · 0.61 goals / match - Leopards

Sofapaka scoring profile: more difficult

Sofapaka scores in 39% of matches (7 of 18 matches), while Leopards keeps a clean sheet in 50% (9 of 18 matches).

Leopards scoring profile: very strong

Leopards scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Sofapaka keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 matches).

12Goals scored (season)23
SofapakaLeopards
22Goals conceded (season)11
SofapakaLeopards
1.89Average goals in match1.89
SofapakaLeopards
1Goals scored (last 5)10
SofapakaLeopards
6Goals conceded (last 5)2
SofapakaLeopards

How often they score at least...

39%1 goal72%
SofapakaLeopards
22%2 goals44%
SofapakaLeopards
6%3 goals6%
SofapakaLeopards
0%4 goals6%
SofapakaLeopards

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal50%
SofapakaLeopards
33%2 goals11%
SofapakaLeopards
11%3 goals0%
SofapakaLeopards
0%4 goals0%
SofapakaLeopards

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time11%
SofapakaLeopards
0%BTTS in both halves6%
SofapakaLeopards
11%Scored in both halves11%
SofapakaLeopards

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
SofapakaLeopards
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
SofapakaLeopards
20%BTTS - last 540%
SofapakaLeopards

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

44%Min. 1 goal before half-time28%
SofapakaLeopards
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time11%
SofapakaLeopards
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
SofapakaLeopards

2nd half

33%Min. 1 goal after half-time39%
SofapakaLeopards
11%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
SofapakaLeopards
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
SofapakaLeopards

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sofapaka is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / match - Sofapaka · 1 pts / match - Leopards

Sofapaka - half-time state
17% leading61% draw22% trailing
Leopards - half-time state
6% leading83% draw11% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per match (1st half)1
SofapakaLeopards
0.28Goals scored (1st half)0.17
SofapakaLeopards
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.22
SofapakaLeopards
0.61Average goals (1st half)0.39
SofapakaLeopards
72%Clean sheet before half-time78%
SofapakaLeopards
78%No goal before half-time83%
SofapakaLeopards

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)1.39
SofapakaLeopards
0.28Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
SofapakaLeopards
0.28Goals conceded (2nd half)0.28
SofapakaLeopards
0.56Average goals (2nd half)0.78
SofapakaLeopards
78%Clean sheet after half-time78%
SofapakaLeopards
83%No goal after half-time67%
SofapakaLeopards

Sofapaka - second-half results

11% W72% R17% P
20
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Leopards - second-half results

22% W72% R6% P
18
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding933%

Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sofapaka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match0.20.0
1 goal20%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Leopards - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.00.6
1 goal0%20%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sofapaka
ScoredConceded
4
14
0-15
2
2
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Leopards
ScoredConceded
12
5
0-15
2
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
3
0
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.89
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.6 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sofapaka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.64
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Leopards

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.58
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 52% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

SofapakaLigaLeopards
Average goals in match 1.891.99 1.89
Both teams scored 28%43% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 28%33% 33%
Clean sheets 22%36% 50%
Goal before half-time 44%30% 28%
Goal after half-time 33%32% 39%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.99
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
36%
Clean sheets
0.96
Home goals / match
1.03
Away goals / match
+-7%
Home attack advantage
+-7%
Home defence advantage
+-8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
30%
1 goal
12%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
32%
1 goal
16%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Sofapaka 0 - 1 - 0 Leopards. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Leopards
1 : 1
Sofapaka

FAQ

What was the result of Sofapaka vs Leopards?

The Kenyan Premier League match finished Sofapaka 0:1 Leopards. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Sofapaka vs Leopards?

Sofapaka score 0.67 goals per game on average and Leopards 1.28. The Kenyan Premier League average is 1.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 28% of Sofapaka's matches and 39% of Leopards's.

What form are Sofapaka and Leopards in?

Over the last 5 games Sofapaka have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Leopards 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sofapaka vs Leopards?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sofapaka vs Leopards: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.