Sogdiana vs Xorazm: match statistics
Sogdiana vs Xorazm: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Sogdiana played Xorazm in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match was played on 16 July 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Sogdiana: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Xorazm: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Sogdiana scores 1.73 and concedes 2.27 goals per match. Xorazm scores 0.82 and concedes 1.18. League average: 2.53 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sogdiana 82%, Xorazm 45%. Over 2.5: Sogdiana 82%, Xorazm 36%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
Sogdiana has higher xG: 1.45 vs 0.98. Sogdiana: 11.6 shots per match, Xorazm: 7.5.
Match halves
Sogdiana: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.82. Xorazm: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.64.
Goals by minute
Sogdiana: 61-75 (5 goals). Xorazm: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Uzbekistan Super League: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sogdiana is the favorite primarily due to outstanding offensive form: in the last 5 matches they scored 16 goals (3.2 per match) and won 4 of 5, averaging 2.4 points per match in that period. At home the hosts average 13.8 shots and 6.8 on target with an average xG of 1.73, while Xorazm on the road has only 5.4 shots, 2 on target and xG 0.77, which indicates a clear Sogdiana advantage in chance creation. The visitors can defend, however — they concede only 0.6 goals away and keep clean sheets in 40% of away matches, and in their last 5 games scored 8 goals (1.6 per match) and averaged 1.6 points. Sogdiana also have defensive vulnerabilities (at home they concede 2.6 goals per match and have 0% clean sheets), so I predict a home win, but with a likely contribution of goals from Xorazm as well.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Sogdiana has averaged 3.2 goals scored in the last 5 matches and BTTS occurred in all 5 fixtures (100%), conceding an average of 1.6 goals per game, which strongly indicates open matches with goals at both ends. Xorazm has low season averages of 0.6 goals scored and 0.6 conceded, but in the last 5 this rose to 1.6 scored and 1.4 conceded, so recent form also increases the away side’s scoring chances. This is supported by xG and shots in the box: Sogdiana posts 1.15 xG on the season (1.75 in last 5) versus Xorazm’s 0.77 xG (1.02 in last 5); hosts average 9.33 shots per match against 5.4 for the visitors, with both sides averaging 2.0 shots on target per game. Season BTTS rates are 50% for Sogdiana and 40% for Xorazm, and clean sheets are rare for the hosts (17% vs 40% for the away side); however, Sogdiana’s last-5 run (16 goals scored and 8 conceded) outweighs this counterargument, so I tip BTTS - Yes as the more probable outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG I calculated expected goals as the average between each team’s xG and the opponent’s xG against: Sogdiana 1.36 (average of 1.15 own xG and 1.57 xG conceded by Xorazm), Xorazm 1.07 (average of 0.77 and 1.36) — total 2.43. Using a Poisson distribution with λ=2.43 the probability of a combined score ≥2 (Over 1.5) is ~70%, ≥3 (Over 2.5) ~44%, and ≥4 (Over 3.5) ~23%. Seasonal data and form support the signal for the 1.5 line: Sogdiana’s season share of matches with over 1.5 goals is 83% and in the last 5 matches they average 3.2 goals (16 goals in 5 matches), Xorazm has 40% and 1.6 goals in the last 5. Additionally Sogdiana has 100% of the last 5 matches with both teams scoring, Xorazm 40%, which increases the likelihood of goals; the 2.5 line is less certain due to Xorazm’s season over2.5 share of 0%. Therefore I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal derived from xG and recent form.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
First-half statistics point to a draw at the break: Xorazm averages 0.0 goals in the first 45 minutes and has kept a clean sheet at half-time in 80% of matches (scoredAVGHT_away 0.0, seasonCSPercentageHT_away 80.0%), while Sogdiana averages 0.33 goals before the break (scoredAVGHT_home 0.33). After the break the advantage shifts to the home side — in the last 5 matches Sogdiana have averaged 1.75 goals in second halves and have won 80% of those games (last5_scored_2hg_avg_overall_home 1.75, last5_winPercentage_overall_home 80.0%). Sogdiana also generates more chances (xG 1.15 vs 0.77 and on average 9.33 shots versus 5.4 for Xorazm; xG_for_avg_home 1.15 vs xG_for_avg_away 0.77, shotsAVG_home 9.33, shotsAVG_away 5.4), which gives them the edge in the second half. Although domestically the home side concedes more goals on average (seasonConcededAVG_home 1.67 vs seasonConcededAVG_away 0.6), the first-half records and Sogdiana’s second-half efficiency indicate the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win after 90 minutes (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sogdiana | Xorazm | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 26% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Sogdiana is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Sogdiana · 1 pts / match - Xorazm
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sogdiana is 111% better for: goals scored per match.
1.73 goals / match - Sogdiana · 0.82 goals / match - Xorazm
Xorazm is 92% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.27 goals / match - Sogdiana · 1.18 goals / match - Xorazm
Sogdiana scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while Xorazm keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).
Xorazm scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while Sogdiana keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 11 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sogdiana
Over / Under - Xorazm
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sogdiana is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.64 pts / match - Sogdiana · 0.82 pts / match - Xorazm
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sogdiana - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 18%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Xorazm - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Sogdiana
Xorazm
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Sogdiana | Liga | Xorazm | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.00 | 2.53 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 82% | 52% | ▼ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 82% | 51% | ▼ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 27% | • 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 67% | ▼ 55% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 91% | 77% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Sogdiana 2 - 0 - 0 Xorazm. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Sogdiana vs Xorazm?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Sogdiana 2:0 Xorazm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sogdiana and Xorazm?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Sogdiana won 2, Xorazm won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sogdiana vs Xorazm?
Sogdiana score 1.73 goals per game on average and Xorazm 0.82. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 82% of Sogdiana's matches and 45% of Xorazm's.
What form are Sogdiana and Xorazm in?
Over the last 5 games Sogdiana have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Xorazm 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sogdiana vs Xorazm?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


