Norway - First DivisionFosshaugane CampusData current as of 06 September 2026

Sogndal vs Moss: match statistics

Sogndal crest
Sogndal
2 : 4half-time 2:3
Moss crest
Moss

Sogndal vs Moss: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sogndal played Moss in First Division (Norway). The match was played on 14 June 2026. Venue: Fosshaugane Campus. Final score: 2:4.

Current form

Sogndal: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Moss: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sogndal scores 1.70 and concedes 2.20 goals per match. Moss scores 1.60 and concedes 2.00. League average: 3.55 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sogndal 50%, Moss 80%. Over 2.5: Sogndal 80%, Moss 80%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 71%.

xG, shots and style

Sogndal has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.65. Sogndal: 14.9 shots per match, Moss: 14.3.

Match halves

Sogndal: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.10. Moss: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 1.10.

Goals by minute

Sogndal: 76-90+ (5 goals). Moss: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division: 3.55 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 71%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I favor a Sogndal home win. At home Sogndal averages 2.25 goals per game with 7.25 shots on target and 16.75 total shots, while Moss away manage only 1.6 goals per game and 5.8 shots on target from 14 attempts. Sogndal concede 1.5 goals at home versus Moss’s 2.6 conceded away; home goal difference is +3 compared to the visitors’ -5. Hosts also keep a clean sheet in 25% of matches, whereas Moss have 0%. In the last 5 games Sogndal scored 12 goals and average 1.6 points per game, while Moss scored 9 goals and only 1.0 point per game, highlighting Sogndal’s superior form and efficiency; xG also favors the hosts (1.98 vs 1.71). Considering the offensive edge, better home defence and favorable form trends, I give Sogndal the higher probability of victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show a very strong BTTS signal: season BTTS rate is 80% for both Sogndal and Moss, and in the last 5 matches it's 80% for Sogndal and 100% for Moss. The absence of clean sheets further reinforces this signal — Sogndal has 20% clean sheets, Moss 0% season clean sheets. Goal and xG metrics point to an exchange of chances: season average goals scored are 1.6 each, average goals conceded are 1.4 (Sogndal) vs 2.6 (Moss), xG for Sogndal is 1.59 vs 1.71 for Moss, and xG against is 1.73 and 1.8. In the last 5 matches Sogndal scores 2.4 and concedes 1.8 on average, while Moss scores 1.8 and concedes 2.2; Moss also has more shots on target (5.8 vs 4.4), increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. Considering the 80%/80% season BTTS, Moss’s 100% BTTS form and low clean sheet percentages, I recommend BTTS - Yes with an 85% probability vs 15% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I calculated expected goals as the average of the team’s attack xG and the opponent’s defensive xG: Sogndal 1.70 ((1.59+1.80)/2) and Moss 1.72 ((1.71+1.73)/2), totaling 3.42. Both teams have an offensive profile — Sogndal averages 1.6 goals per season and 2.4 in the last 5 matches, Moss 1.6 per season and 1.8 in the last 5; both sides have BTTS at 80%. Season-long over statistics support this picture: Sogndal has Over 2.5 in 60% of matches, Moss in 100%, and the league averages 3.55 goals per game; additionally Moss has Over 1.5 in 100% of fixtures. Based on this I assign probabilities: Over 1.5 — 92% (Under 8%), Over 2.5 — 78% (Under 22%) and Over 3.5 — 45% (Under 55%). The strongest signal is Over 2.5 (ou_pred_side "over", ou_pred_line 2.5), because combined xG 3.42, the high BTTS rate of 80% and historical 60%/100% Over 2.5 point to a clear edge on that line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Sogndal led at the break in 60% of matches and has averaged 0.8 goals by half-time versus 0.2 for Moss; the home HTPPG is 2.0 compared to 0.4 for the visitors, indicating strong first-half control by the hosts. Although xG is similar (1.59 for Sogndal vs 1.71 for Moss), Moss concedes far more goals over the season (2.6 on average) than Sogndal (1.4) and has a higher xG against (1.8 vs 1.73), which undermines their ability to withstand a home lead. Both teams have a high BTTS rate at 80%, but HT BTTS is only 20%, while Moss have 100% of matches with >1.5 second-half goals, meaning their goals tend to come after the break. Therefore the most likely scenario is Sogndal leading at half-time and the hosts winning at full-time (1/1) — hence 39% for 1/1, with smaller probabilities for 1/X (15%) and a Moss turnaround (1/2 6%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 3
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
SogndalMoss
19Shots27
SogndalMoss
6Shots on target11
SogndalMoss
2.1xG2.89
SogndalMoss
7Corners7
SogndalMoss
68Dangerous attacks60
SogndalMoss
9Fouls7
SogndalMoss
0Cards3
SogndalMoss

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.7Goals scored / match1.6
SogndalMoss
2.2Goals conceded / match2
SogndalMoss
45%Average possession47%
SogndalMoss
4.8Shots on target / match5.1
SogndalMoss

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.9Shots per match14.3
SogndalMoss
4.8Shots on target5.1
SogndalMoss
11.4%Shot conversion11.2%
SogndalMoss
45%Possession47%
SogndalMoss
1.71xG for1.65
SogndalMoss
2.24xG against1.76
SogndalMoss

Shooting quality

Sogndal: AttackingMoss: Attacking
SogndalMoss
Accuracy (shots on target)32%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sogndal is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Sogndal · 1 pts / match - Moss

Sogndal
WDDLW
Season result split
30% W30% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-4
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-1
Last 5 at home
2-1-1
LWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.96Opponent xG: 2.22BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Moss
LWDLD
Season result split
40% W20% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-4
1.40 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-3
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.96BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sogndal is 6% better for: goals scored per match.

1.7 goals / match - Sogndal · 1.6 goals / match - Moss

Moss is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.2 goals / match - Sogndal · 2 goals / match - Moss

Sogndal scoring profile: very strong

Sogndal scores in 60% of matches (6 of 10 matches), while Moss keeps a clean sheet in 10% (1 of 10 matches).

Moss scoring profile: very strong

Moss scores in 90% of matches (9 of 10 matches), while Sogndal keeps a clean sheet in 10% (1 of 10 matches).

17Goals scored (season)16
SogndalMoss
22Goals conceded (season)20
SogndalMoss
3.9Average goals in match3.6
SogndalMoss
12Goals scored (last 5)9
SogndalMoss
9Goals conceded (last 5)11
SogndalMoss

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal90%
SogndalMoss
60%2 goals50%
SogndalMoss
30%3 goals20%
SogndalMoss
10%4 goals0%
SogndalMoss

How often they concede at least...

90%1 goal90%
SogndalMoss
80%2 goals70%
SogndalMoss
40%3 goals30%
SogndalMoss
10%4 goals10%
SogndalMoss

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time20%
SogndalMoss
0%BTTS in both halves0%
SogndalMoss
30%Scored in both halves10%
SogndalMoss

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS70%
SogndalMoss
30%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
SogndalMoss
80%BTTS - last 5100%
SogndalMoss

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

90%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
SogndalMoss
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
SogndalMoss
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time30%
SogndalMoss

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
SogndalMoss
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time70%
SogndalMoss
40%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
SogndalMoss

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sogndal is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.3 pts / match - Sogndal · 1.2 pts / match - Moss

Sogndal - half-time state
40% leading10% draw50% trailing
Moss - half-time state
30% leading30% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.3Points per match (1st half)1.2
SogndalMoss
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.5
SogndalMoss
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.9
SogndalMoss
1.6Average goals (1st half)1.4
SogndalMoss
40%Clean sheet before half-time50%
SogndalMoss
60%No goal before half-time60%
SogndalMoss

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)1.3
SogndalMoss
1.1Goals scored (2nd half)1.1
SogndalMoss
1.2Goals conceded (2nd half)1.1
SogndalMoss
2.3Average goals (2nd half)2.2
SogndalMoss
30%Clean sheet after half-time30%
SogndalMoss
50%No goal after half-time40%
SogndalMoss

Sogndal - second-half results

40% W20% R40% P
13
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding75%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 30%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Moss - second-half results

40% W10% R50% P
12
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sogndal - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.82.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Moss - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match2.02.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sogndal
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
1
3
16-30
1
2
31-45
2
6
46-60
4
2
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Moss
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
1
5
16-30
2
2
31-45
3
5
46-60
3
4
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sogndal

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Moss

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

SogndalLigaMoss
Average goals in match 3.903.55 3.60
Both teams scored 50%56% 80%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 80%71% 80%
Clean sheets 10%23% 10%
Goal before half-time 90%79% 70%
Goal after half-time 90%88% 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.55
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
2.00
Home goals / match
1.55
Away goals / match
+29%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
38%
3 goals
16%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SogndalGoalOliver HintsaAssist: Kasper Skaanes
  2. MossGoalJulian LægreidAssist: Oscar Aga
  3. SogndalGoalOliver HintsaAssist: Kasper Skaanes
  4. MossGoalOscar Aga
  5. MossSubstitutionOn: Sigurd Jacobsen PrestmoOff: Robert Marcus
  6. MossYellow cardJamiu Musbaudeen
  7. MossYellow cardMarius Cassidy
  8. SogndalSubstitutionOn: Onni HelenOff: Vegard Haugerud Hagen
  9. MossYellow cardOscar Aga
  10. SogndalSubstitutionOn: Preben AspOff: Martin Høyland
  11. SogndalSubstitutionOn: Elias Svedal FloOff: Lūkass Vapne
  12. MossSubstitutionOn: Wilmer OlofssonOff: Niclas Schjøth Semmen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Sogndal 1 - 0 - 1 Moss. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Sogndal Fotball
3 : 1
Moss FK
Moss FK
3 : 1
Sogndal Fotball

FAQ

What was the result of Sogndal vs Moss?

The First Division match finished Sogndal 2:4 Moss. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Sogndal and Moss?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Sogndal won 1, Moss won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Sogndal vs Moss?

Sogndal score 1.70 goals per game on average and Moss 1.60. The First Division average is 3.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Sogndal's matches and 80% of Moss's.

What form are Sogndal and Moss in?

Over the last 5 games Sogndal have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Moss 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sogndal vs Moss?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sogndal vs Moss: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.