Sogndal vs Ranheim: match statistics
Sogndal vs Ranheim: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Sogndal played Ranheim in First Division (Norway). The match was played on 26 July 2026. Venue: Fosshaugane Campus. Final score: 3:2.
Current form
Sogndal: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Ranheim: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Sogndal scores 1.79 and concedes 2.57 goals per match. Ranheim scores 2.43 and concedes 2.43. League average: 3.73 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sogndal 64%, Ranheim 79%. Over 2.5: Sogndal 86%, Ranheim 93%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 73%.
xG, shots and style
Sogndal has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.69. Sogndal: 15.4 shots per match, Ranheim: 14.5.
Match halves
Sogndal: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.86. Ranheim: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.36.
Goals by minute
Sogndal: 16-30 (6 goals). Ranheim: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 3.73 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 73%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sogndal has a clear offensive advantage at home — averaging 2.5 goals per home match versus Ranheim’s 1.5 away; in the last 5 matches hosts scored 11 goals compared to visitors’ 8. Hosts produce higher xG (1.89 at home vs 1.28 xG for Ranheim away) and register more shots and SOT (avg. 15.83 shots and 6.67 SOT vs 9.83 and 4.17), indicating better quality chances. Both teams have defensive issues in the short term — each conceded 16 goals in the last 5 matches, but Ranheim concedes 3.33 goals away statistically versus 2.00 conceded by Sogndal at home. Ranheim has 0% clean sheets on the road and loses 83% of away games, while Sogndal wins 50% of home matches and has a lower share of matches without scoring (17% vs 33%), which favours the hosts. Additionally, Sogndal averages 1.2 points per match in the last 5 fixtures vs 0.8 for Ranheim, confirming the hosts’ superior short-term form. Considering the higher xG, greater shot volume and Ranheim’s poorer away defence, I project a Sogndal victory, although I expect an open, high-scoring game.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The primary signal indicates BTTS - Yes (both teams to score) — Sogndal have 88% of matches this season with both teams scoring, Ranheim 67%, against a league average of 60%. In the last 5 matches Sogndal show 100% BTTS, Ranheim 80%; over that period Sogndal averaged 2.2 goals scored and conceded 3.2, while Ranheim averaged 1.6 scored and conceded 3.2 (16 goals conceded in 5 games). Goals and xG data confirm pressure from both sides: Sogndal score 3.13 goals at home on average and concede 1.75, Ranheim score 1.50 and concede 3.33; xG is 1.99 for Sogndal versus 2.00 xG against Ranheim, and 1.28 xG for Ranheim versus 1.51 xG against Sogndal — both teams create and allow chances. The creation gap (Sogndal 18.0 shots and 6.5 on target vs Ranheim 9.83 and 4.17) favors the home side, but the high share of matches over 2.5 goals (88% for Sogndal, 100% for Ranheim) and relatively high conversion rates (17% vs 15%) raise the likelihood of goals at both ends. Considering all numbers (88%/67% season BTTS, 100%/80% in last 5, average 3.2 goals conceded each), I estimate BTTS probability at about 85% vs 15% and my top pick is BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect approximately 2.00 goals for Sogndal and 1.40 for Ranheim (total 3.40); figures stem from comparing home attack xG 1.99 vs away defense xG 2.00 and away attack xG 1.28 vs home defense xG 1.51. Historically both teams show a very high share of matches with goals: Over 1.5 is 100% for both, Over 2.5 is 88% for Sogndal and 100% for Ranheim, and in the last 5 meetings both teams produced Over 2.5 in 100% of cases. Additionally Sogndal averages 18 shots and 6.5 on target per match with a 17% conversion, which explains their 3.13 goals scored average; Ranheim records 9.83 shots and 4.17 on target, but concedes on average 3.33 goals per match. High indicators that both teams score (BTTS 88% for Sogndal, 67% for Ranheim) and virtually no clean sheets for the visitors (0% clean sheets for Ranheim) further increase the likelihood of goals from both sides. Considering the expected 3.40 goals, seasonal Over 2.5 rates (88%/100%) and recent form (last 5 matches Over 2.5 = 100%), I recommend playing Over 2.5 (side: over).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I choose X/1 (draw at Half-Time, Sogndal win at Full-Time) as the most probable scenario. Sogndal draw at the break in 38% of matches and average 1.25 goals scored and 0.75 conceded by half-time (2.00 goals per first half on average), indicating balanced but goalful first halves. In second halves hosts score an average 1.88 goals and have earned 17 points after the break with a 63% success rate for second-half wins, while Ranheim concede an average 2.33 goals after the break and have only a 17% away win rate, so hosts more often overturn draws after Half-Time. Additionally Sogndal have higher xG (1.99 vs 1.28) and more shots per game on average (18.0 vs 9.83), and home BTTS occurs in 88% of matches, which further supports the draw at Half-Time and Sogndal victory at Full-Time scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sogndal | Ranheim | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Sogndal is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Sogndal · 0.8 pts / match - Ranheim
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ranheim is 36% better for: goals scored per match.
1.79 goals / match - Sogndal · 2.43 goals / match - Ranheim
Ranheim is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.57 goals / match - Sogndal · 2.43 goals / match - Ranheim
Sogndal scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Ranheim keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).
Ranheim scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Sogndal keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sogndal
Over / Under - Ranheim
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ranheim is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.14 pts / match - Sogndal · 1.36 pts / match - Ranheim
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sogndal - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Ranheim - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 3.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 80% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 0% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Sogndal
Ranheim
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Sogndal | Liga | Ranheim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.36 | 3.73 | ▲ 4.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 61% | ▲ 79% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 86% | 73% | ▲ 93% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 7% | 21% | ▼ 7% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 93% | 76% | ▲ 93% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 89% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Sogndal 1 - 0 - 1 Ranheim. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Sogndal vs Ranheim?
The First Division match finished Sogndal 3:2 Ranheim. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sogndal and Ranheim?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Sogndal won 1, Ranheim won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sogndal vs Ranheim?
Sogndal score 1.79 goals per game on average and Ranheim 2.43. The First Division average is 3.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Sogndal's matches and 79% of Ranheim's.
What form are Sogndal and Ranheim in?
Over the last 5 games Sogndal have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Ranheim 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sogndal vs Ranheim?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


