Sol de América vs Fernando de la Mora: match statistics
Sol de América vs Fernando de la Mora: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Sol de América played Fernando de la Mora in Division Intermedia (Paraguay). The match was played on 13 September 2026. Venue: Estadio Luís Alfonso Giagni. Final score: 3:2.
Current form
Sol de América: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Fernando de la Mora: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Sol de América scores 1.17 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Fernando de la Mora scores 1.04 and concedes 1.35. League average: 2.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sol de América 61%, Fernando de la Mora 57%. Over 2.5: Sol de América 17%, Fernando de la Mora 43%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
Fernando de la Mora has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.54. Sol de América: 11.4 shots per match, Fernando de la Mora: 12.3.
Match halves
Sol de América: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.48. Fernando de la Mora: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.74.
Goals by minute
Sol de América: 31-45+ (8 goals). Fernando de la Mora: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Division Intermedia: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-2-0. Average goals 1.67, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sol de América sit 5th, while Fernando de la Mora are 12th, and the hosts have lost just 3 matches all season, recording 7 wins and 13 draws. At home, Sol de América remain unbeaten, yet as many as 82% of their matches have ended in draws; they score just 0.82 goals per game despite creating chances worth an average of 1.72 xG. Away from home, the visitors concede 1.45 goals per match and have a -4 goal difference, but their recent form is similar to that of the hosts: both teams have collected 8 points from their previous five matches. Sol de América’s defence is clearly more solid, averaging 0.55 goals conceded at home and keeping a clean sheet in 45% of matches, which should limit a visiting side scoring 1.09 goals away from home. A low-scoring draw is the most likely outcome, as the hosts’ defensive superiority and higher quality of chances created are offset by their very poor finishing and strong tendency to draw at home.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The seasonal BTTS rates stand at 64% for Sol de América and 55% for Fernando de la Mora, providing a slight signal for goals from both sides compared with the league average of 56%. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in just 9% of their matches, while the visitors concede an average of 1.45 goals per game, meaning both teams have favorable conditions to find the net. Their attacking potential is supported by the xG figures: Sol de América average 1.68 xG, while Fernando de la Mora average 1.44, with the opponents’ xG conceded standing at 1.39 and 1.43, respectively. Caution is warranted based on the hosts’ last five matches, in which BTTS landed in only 40% of cases and the team scored 4 goals in total. Despite this weaker run, the visitors have recorded BTTS in 60% of their last five games and average 1.4 goals scored, so the scenario with both teams finding the net remains more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have a very consistent profile of matches finishing Under 3.5 goals: this outcome occurred in 73% of Sol de América and Fernando de la Mora matches. The hosts score an average of 1.00 goals, while the visitors average 1.09, with both defences conceding just 0.60 and 0.80 goals per match respectively over the last five rounds. The chance-creation potential is slightly higher, as the hosts’ xG stands at 1.68 and the visitors’ at 1.44; however, Sol de América’s conversion rate is only 7%, limiting the risk of a high-scoring game. The Under 3.5 goals line is also supported by league data, where the average number of goals is 2.59 and only 27% of matches involving either team went over the 3.5-goal line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Sol de América win after the match, as the hosts were level at the break in 55% of their games, compared with as many as 64% for Fernando de la Mora. Both teams tend to start cautiously: the hosts average 0.27 goals before half-time, while the visitors average 0.36, and in their last five matches, a half-time draw occurred in 60% and 80% of cases, respectively. After the break, Sol de América average 0.73 goals and win the second half in 36% of matches, while the visitors also score 0.73 goals but lose this period in 45% of games and concede 1.09 goals during it. The hosts also have a higher average xG, 1.68 compared with 1.44, and register more shots, 13.73 to 10.91, which strengthens the likelihood of them turning a closely contested match in their favour after half-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sol de América | Fernando de la Mora | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Fernando de la Mora is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Sol de América · 1.6 pts / match - Fernando de la Mora
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sol de América is 13% better for: goals scored per match.
1.17 goals / match - Sol de América · 1.04 goals / match - Fernando de la Mora
Sol de América is 63% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.83 goals / match - Sol de América · 1.35 goals / match - Fernando de la Mora
Sol de América scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while Fernando de la Mora keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 matches).
Fernando de la Mora scores in 70% of matches (16 of 23 matches), while Sol de América keeps a clean sheet in 30% (7 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sol de América
Over / Under - Fernando de la Mora
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sol de América is 52% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.52 pts / match - Sol de América · 1 pts / match - Fernando de la Mora
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sol de América - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Fernando de la Mora - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Sol de América
Fernando de la Mora
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Division Intermedia).
Teams vs league
| Sol de América | Liga | Fernando de la Mora | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.00 | 2.58 | ▼ 2.39 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 56% | • 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 17% | 44% | • 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 26% | ▼ 22% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 70% | 68% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 57% | 74% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Sol de América 1 - 2 - 0 Fernando de la Mora. Average goals 1.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Sol de América vs Fernando de la Mora?
The Division Intermedia match finished Sol de América 3:2 Fernando de la Mora. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sol de América and Fernando de la Mora?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Sol de América won 1, Fernando de la Mora won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sol de América vs Fernando de la Mora?
Sol de América score 1.17 goals per game on average and Fernando de la Mora 1.04. The Division Intermedia average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Sol de América's matches and 57% of Fernando de la Mora's.
What form are Sol de América and Fernando de la Mora in?
Over the last 5 games Sol de América have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Fernando de la Mora 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sol de América vs Fernando de la Mora?
The statistical background for Sol de América vs Fernando de la Mora — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


