Georgia - Erovnuli LigaData current as of 03 November 2026

Spaeri vs Dila: match statistics

Spaeri crest
Spaeri
1 : 4half-time 1:4
Dila crest
Dila

Spaeri vs Dila: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Spaeri played Dila in Erovnuli Liga (Georgia). The match was played on 21 September 2026. Final score: 1:4.

Current form

Spaeri: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Dila: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Spaeri scores 1.27 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Dila scores 1.31 and concedes 1.12. League average: 2.64 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Spaeri 65%, Dila 50%. Over 2.5: Spaeri 58%, Dila 50%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Spaeri has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.41. Spaeri: 11.0 shots per match, Dila: 11.1.

Match halves

Spaeri: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.73. Dila: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.69.

Goals by minute

Spaeri: 31-45+ (9 goals). Dila: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Erovnuli Liga: 2.64 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Dila sit 5th, while Spaeri are ninth. Most importantly, the visitors have collected 10 points from their last five matches, recording 3 wins and 1 draw; over the same period, the hosts managed just 2 points. Spaeri have failed to win any of their last five games, scoring 6 goals and conceding as many as 11, which stands in clear contrast to Dila’s record of 9 goals scored and only 6 conceded. At home, Spaeri create slightly more attacking quality, averaging 1.42 xG and 1.67 goals per match, but their defence allows opponents 1.54 xG and concedes an average of 1.58 goals. Dila average just 1.18 goals away from home, but defend more consistently, conceding 1.18 goals with opponents averaging 1.31 xG. They also keep a clean sheet in 27% of matches, compared with just 8% for Spaeri at home. The advantage in current form and significantly more reliable defensive performances point towards an away win, although Spaeri’s strong home scoring record leaves a meaningful draw risk.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The case for both teams to score is strengthened by their current form: BTTS occurred in 60% of Spaeri’s last five matches and in as many as 80% of Dila’s games. During this period, Spaeri conceded an average of 2.2 goals per match, while Dila scored 1.8, clearly increasing the visitors’ chances of finding the net. The hosts also have solid grounds to respond, as they create an average of 1.48 xG and register 4.36 shots on target per match, while Dila allows opponents 1.31 xG. Seasonal BTTS figures are moderate, standing at 50% for Spaeri and 45% for Dila, but recent results and the combined league average of 2.61 goals support a slight preference for the “BTTS - Yes” option.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The projection of 2.80 goals is based on combining Spaeri’s average xG of 1.48 with Dila’s xG of 1.34, alongside defensive metrics of 1.23 and 1.31, respectively. In their last five matches, Spaeri conceded as many as 2.2 goals per game, while Dila scored 1.8, clearly strengthening the visitors’ goal-scoring potential. At least two goals were scored in 57% of Spaeri’s matches and 64% of Dila’s matches throughout the season, while in the current run, the percentage of games finishing Over 2.5 goals has risen to 60% and 80%, respectively. Both teams also show a high scoring consistency: Spaeri scored in 79% of their matches, while Dila did so in 73%. The strongest selection is Over 1.5 goals, as it combines a favourable projection of close to three goals with the relatively low risk of requiring only two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Dila are in clearly superior current form: over their last five matches, they averaged 2.0 points, won 60% of their games, and scored 1.8 goals per match, while Spaeri failed to win any of theirs, recording just 0.4 points and conceding 2.2 goals per game. The visitors led at the break in 40% of their last five appearances, while Spaeri were also trailing at half-time in 40% of theirs, having conceded an average of 1.4 goals before the interval. Dila also have the more favourable first-half goal difference over this recent run, at +2 compared with the hosts’ -2. After the break, the hosts have recently scored just 0.2 goals per match, whereas Dila averaged 1.0, further supporting the scenario of the visitors maintaining or extending their lead. The 2/2 pick is therefore the strongest, although Dila’s high season-long half-time draw rate of 64% leaves X/2 as a significant alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 4
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
SpaeriDila
11Shots9
SpaeriDila
4Shots on target7
SpaeriDila
1.52xG1.33
SpaeriDila
12Corners4
SpaeriDila
75Dangerous attacks37
SpaeriDila
7Fouls12
SpaeriDila
1Cards0
SpaeriDila

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.27Goals scored / match1.31
SpaeriDila
1.5Goals conceded / match1.12
SpaeriDila
50%Average possession46%
SpaeriDila
4.42Shots on target / match3.96
SpaeriDila

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match11.08
SpaeriDila
4.42Shots on target3.96
SpaeriDila
11.5%Shot conversion11.8%
SpaeriDila
50%Possession46%
SpaeriDila
1.45xG for1.41
SpaeriDila
1.51xG against1.31
SpaeriDila

Shooting quality

Spaeri: BalancedDila: Balanced
SpaeriDila
Accuracy (shots on target)40%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Dila is 250% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Spaeri · 1.4 pts / match - Dila

Spaeri
LLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
19% W38% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-10-11
0.96 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-5
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DWLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Dila
LWWDL
Season result split
42% W15% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-4-11
1.42 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-0-7
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Dila is 34% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Spaeri · 1.12 goals / match - Dila

Spaeri scoring profile: strong

Spaeri scores in 73% of matches (19 of 26 matches), while Dila keeps a clean sheet in 31% (8 of 26 matches).

Dila scoring profile: very strong

Dila scores in 77% of matches (20 of 26 matches), while Spaeri keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 26 matches).

33Goals scored (season)34
SpaeriDila
39Goals conceded (season)29
SpaeriDila
2.77Average goals in match2.42
SpaeriDila
6Goals scored (last 5)8
SpaeriDila
11Goals conceded (last 5)7
SpaeriDila

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal77%
SpaeriDila
31%2 goals38%
SpaeriDila
19%3 goals15%
SpaeriDila
4%4 goals0%
SpaeriDila

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal69%
SpaeriDila
42%2 goals35%
SpaeriDila
19%3 goals8%
SpaeriDila
8%4 goals0%
SpaeriDila

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time27%
SpaeriDila
0%BTTS in both halves8%
SpaeriDila
19%Scored in both halves27%
SpaeriDila

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
SpaeriDila
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
SpaeriDila
60%BTTS - last 580%
SpaeriDila

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
SpaeriDila
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
SpaeriDila
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
SpaeriDila

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
SpaeriDila
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time46%
SpaeriDila
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
SpaeriDila

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Dila is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.12 pts / match - Spaeri · 1.38 pts / match - Dila

Spaeri - half-time state
27% leading31% draw42% trailing
Dila - half-time state
27% leading58% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.12Points per match (1st half)1.38
SpaeriDila
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.62
SpaeriDila
0.88Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
SpaeriDila
1.42Average goals (1st half)1.04
SpaeriDila
46%Clean sheet before half-time62%
SpaeriDila
58%No goal before half-time54%
SpaeriDila

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)1.23
SpaeriDila
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
SpaeriDila
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)0.69
SpaeriDila
1.35Average goals (2nd half)1.38
SpaeriDila
54%Clean sheet after half-time50%
SpaeriDila
50%No goal after half-time42%
SpaeriDila

Spaeri - second-half results

38% W35% D27% L
29
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding70%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 19%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dila - second-half results

27% W42% D31% L
36
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding156%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Spaeri - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match1.40.8
Average goals in match2.41.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5
Dila - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Spaeri
ScoredConceded
4
11
0-15
1
6
16-30
9
6
31-45
5
2
46-60
5
8
61-75
9
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Dila
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
7
2
16-30
5
5
31-45
3
4
46-60
6
5
61-75
9
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Spaeri

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Dila

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Erovnuli Liga).

Teams vs league

SpaeriLigaDila
Average goals in match▲ 2.772.64▼ 2.42
Both teams scored▲ 65%57%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 58%53%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▼ 19%26%▲ 31%
Goal before half-time▲ 77%67%▼ 58%
Goal after half-time▲ 77%74%▲ 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.64
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / match
1.23
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. DilaGoalKanté KefingAssist: Shota Shekiladze
  2. DilaGoalKanté Kefing
  3. DilaSubstitutionOn: Badri GogoberishviliOff: Shota Shekiladze
  4. DilaSubstitutionOn: Zurab MuselianiOff: Otar Parulava
  5. SpaeriYellow cardNika Chagunava
  6. DilaSubstitutionOn: Georgii KobakhidzeOff: Mohamed Kanté

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Spaeri 0 - 0 - 2 Dila. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Spaeri vs Dila?

The Erovnuli Liga match finished Spaeri 1:4 Dila. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Spaeri and Dila?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Spaeri won 0, Dila won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Spaeri vs Dila?

Spaeri score 1.27 goals per game on average and Dila 1.31. The Erovnuli Liga average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Spaeri's matches and 50% of Dila's.

What form are Spaeri and Dila in?

Over the last 5 games Spaeri have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Dila 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Spaeri vs Dila?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.