Poland - 3 Liga Group 4Data current as of 23 July 2026

Sparta KW vs Chełmianka Chełm: match statistics

Sparta KW crest
Sparta KW
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Chełmianka Chełm crest
Chełmianka Chełm

Sparta KW vs Chełmianka Chełm: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sparta KW play Chełmianka Chełm in 3 Liga Group 4 (Poland). The match date is 19 April 2026 at 13:00. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Sparta KW: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Chełmianka Chełm: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sparta KW scores 0.85 and concedes 3.24 goals per match. Chełmianka Chełm scores 1.91 and concedes 0.91. League average: 3.13 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sparta KW 38%, Chełmianka Chełm 56%. Over 2.5: Sparta KW 68%, Chełmianka Chełm 47%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Chełmianka Chełm has higher xG: 1.60 vs 0.99. Sparta KW: 2.3 shots per match, Chełmianka Chełm: 2.4.

Match halves

Sparta KW: half-time lead 3%, second-half goals 0.38. Chełmianka Chełm: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.65.

Goals by minute

Sparta KW: 0-15 (14 goals). Chełmianka Chełm: 0-15 (31 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3 Liga Group 4: 3.13 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

The favorites are the visitors: Chełmianka have 15 wins, 7 draws and only 4 losses this season, while Sparta have managed just 3 wins, 1 draw and as many as 22 losses. Last 5-match form also favors the visitors — Chełmianka scored 13 goals and conceded 4, whereas Sparta scored 6 and conceded 17 over the same period. In the home/away split there is a large discrepancy: Sparta concede on average 3.23 goals at home (xG against 2.02) and score 1.23 goals (xG 1.09), while Chełmianka on the road average 1.69 goals scored (xG 1.40) and concede only 1.15 goals (xG against 1.06). Additionally, the visitors have 38% clean sheets away and a +7 away goal difference, whereas Sparta have only 8% clean sheets at home and a -26 home goal difference. In summary, considering the 17 goals Sparta conceded in their last 5 matches, the average xG and the higher points per game for the visitors in the last 5 fixtures (2.0 vs 0.6), I assign a 75% chance to a Chełmianka win, 15% to a draw and 10% to a Sparta win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
-1Shots-1
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
-1Shots on target-1
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
0xG0
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
-1Corners-1
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
0Dangerous attacks0
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
-1Fouls-1
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
-1Cards-1
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
0.85Goals scored / match1.91
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
3.24Goals conceded / match0.91
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
17%Average possession13%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
0.59Shots on target / match0.59
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

2.29Shots per match2.38
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
0.59Shots on target0.59
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
37.2%Shot conversion80.2%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
17%Possession13%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
0.99xG for1.6
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
2.12xG against1.04
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm

Shooting quality

Sparta KW: Counter-attackingChełmianka Chełm: Counter-attacking
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
Accuracy (shots on target)26%25%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.430.67
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.443.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chełmianka Chełm is 333% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Sparta KW · 2.6 pts / match - Chełmianka Chełm

Sparta KW
LLLWL
Season result split
12% W3% R85% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-29
0.38 pts / match · goal difference -81
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-14
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 3.69BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 80%
Chełmianka Chełm
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
62% W26% R12% P
Season (W-D-L)
21-9-4
2.12 pts / match · goal difference +34
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-6-3
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chełmianka Chełm is 125% better for: goals scored per match.

0.85 goals / match - Sparta KW · 1.91 goals / match - Chełmianka Chełm

Chełmianka Chełm is 256% better for: goals conceded per match.

3.24 goals / match - Sparta KW · 0.91 goals / match - Chełmianka Chełm

Sparta KW scoring profile: mixed

Sparta KW scores in 44% of matches (15 of 34 matches), while Chełmianka Chełm keeps a clean sheet in 41% (14 of 34 matches).

Chełmianka Chełm scoring profile: very strong

Chełmianka Chełm scores in 88% of matches (30 of 34 matches), while Sparta KW keeps a clean sheet in 6% (2 of 34 matches).

29Goals scored (season)65
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
110Goals conceded (season)31
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
4.09Average goals in match2.82
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
3Goals scored (last 5)13
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
15Goals conceded (last 5)6
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm

How often they score at least...

44%1 goal88%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
26%2 goals53%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
6%3 goals26%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
3%4 goals15%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm

How often they concede at least...

94%1 goal59%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
79%2 goals18%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
62%3 goals9%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
44%4 goals3%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
Chełmianka Chełm - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.19 of 34 matches
59%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time18%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
6%BTTS in both halves3%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
12%Scored in both halves26%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
32%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
20%BTTS - last 560%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time65%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chełmianka Chełm is 166% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.62 pts / match - Sparta KW · 1.65 pts / match - Chełmianka Chełm

Sparta KW - half-time state
3% leading53% draw44% trailing
Chełmianka Chełm - half-time state
38% leading50% draw12% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.62Points per match (1st half)1.65
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
0.15Goals scored (1st half)0.74
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
0.88Goals conceded (1st half)0.32
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
1.03Average goals (1st half)1.06
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
50%Clean sheet before half-time76%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
85%No goal before half-time47%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm

After half-time (2nd half)

0.68Points per match (2nd half)1.38
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.65
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
1.06Goals conceded (2nd half)0.44
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
1.44Average goals (2nd half)1.09
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
41%Clean sheet after half-time62%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm
79%No goal after half-time56%
Sparta KWChełmianka Chełm

Sparta KW - second-half results

9% W41% R50% P
21
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-25
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-23
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding400%

Leads at half-time in 3% of matches and wins 12%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chełmianka Chełm - second-half results

29% W50% R21% P
56
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding163%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sparta KW - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match1.61.4
Average goals in match1.81.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-7-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Chełmianka Chełm - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sparta KW
ScoredConceded
14
55
0-15
2
10
16-30
0
9
31-45
4
5
46-60
2
11
61-75
7
20
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (14 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (55). Late-goal balance (76-90): -13 - late phases are a weakness.

Chełmianka Chełm
ScoredConceded
31
9
0-15
7
2
16-30
5
5
31-45
8
2
46-60
7
5
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (31 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 2.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-71%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
39%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sparta KW

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
50%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
227%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 48% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Chełmianka Chełm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
54%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 48% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 4).

Teams vs league

Sparta KWLigaChełmianka Chełm
Average goals in match 4.093.13 2.82
Both teams scored 38%59% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 68%59% 47%
Clean sheets 6%23% 41%
Goal before half-time 53%57% 59%
Goal after half-time 65%61% 65%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.13
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.70
Home goals / match
1.43
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Sparta KW 0 - 0 - 1 Chełmianka Chełm. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Chełmianka Chełm
1 : 0
Sparta KW

FAQ

What was the result of Sparta KW vs Chełmianka Chełm?

The 3 Liga Group 4 match finished Sparta KW 0:2 Chełmianka Chełm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Sparta KW vs Chełmianka Chełm?

Sparta KW score 0.85 goals per game on average and Chełmianka Chełm 1.91. The 3 Liga Group 4 average is 3.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Sparta KW's matches and 56% of Chełmianka Chełm's.

What form are Sparta KW and Chełmianka Chełm in?

Over the last 5 games Sparta KW have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Chełmianka Chełm 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sparta KW vs Chełmianka Chełm?

The statistical background for Sparta KW vs Chełmianka Chełm — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.