Spartak Pleven vs Vihren Sandanski: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Spartak Pleven vs Vihren Sandanski: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Spartak Pleven play Vihren Sandanski in Second League (Bulgaria). The match date is 30 August 2026. Venue: Pleven Stadium.
Current form
Spartak Pleven: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Vihren Sandanski: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Spartak Pleven scores 1.20 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Vihren Sandanski scores 1.80 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Spartak Pleven 40%, Vihren Sandanski 80%. Over 2.5: Spartak Pleven 60%, Vihren Sandanski 40%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 42%.
xG, shots and style
Vihren Sandanski has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.46. Spartak Pleven: 12.2 shots per match, Vihren Sandanski: 13.8.
Match halves
Spartak Pleven: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.80. Vihren Sandanski: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 1.20.
Goals by minute
Spartak Pleven: 61-75 (2 goals). Vihren Sandanski: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second League: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 42%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Spartak Pleven | Vihren Sandanski | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 25% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Vihren Sandanski is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Spartak Pleven · 1.8 pts / match - Vihren Sandanski
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vihren Sandanski is 50% better for: goals scored per match.
1.2 goals / match - Spartak Pleven · 1.8 goals / match - Vihren Sandanski
Vihren Sandanski is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.4 goals / match - Spartak Pleven · 1.2 goals / match - Vihren Sandanski
Spartak Pleven scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Vihren Sandanski keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
Vihren Sandanski scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Spartak Pleven keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Spartak Pleven
Over / Under - Vihren Sandanski
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Vihren Sandanski is 120% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Spartak Pleven · 2.2 pts / match - Vihren Sandanski
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Spartak Pleven - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Vihren Sandanski - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 40%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Spartak Pleven
Vihren Sandanski
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).
Teams vs league
| Spartak Pleven | Liga | Vihren Sandanski | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.60 | 2.58 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 48% | ▲ 80% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 42% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 29% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 62% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 77% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Spartak Pleven 0 - 0 - 2 Vihren Sandanski. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
When do Spartak Pleven and Vihren Sandanski play?
Spartak Pleven face Vihren Sandanski on 30 August 2026 in Second League at Pleven Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Spartak Pleven and Vihren Sandanski?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Spartak Pleven won 0, Vihren Sandanski won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Spartak Pleven vs Vihren Sandanski?
Spartak Pleven score 1.20 goals per game on average and Vihren Sandanski 1.80. The Second League average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Spartak Pleven's matches and 80% of Vihren Sandanski's.
What form are Spartak Pleven and Vihren Sandanski in?
Over the last 5 games Spartak Pleven have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Vihren Sandanski 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Spartak Pleven vs Vihren Sandanski?
The statistical background for Spartak Pleven vs Vihren Sandanski — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.