Spartak Pleven vs Vihren Sandanski: match statistics
Spartak Pleven vs Vihren Sandanski: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Spartak Pleven played Vihren Sandanski in Second League (Bulgaria). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Venue: Pleven Stadium. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Spartak Pleven: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Vihren Sandanski: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Spartak Pleven scores 1.20 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Vihren Sandanski scores 1.80 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Spartak Pleven 40%, Vihren Sandanski 80%. Over 2.5: Spartak Pleven 60%, Vihren Sandanski 40%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 43%.
xG, shots and style
Vihren Sandanski has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.46. Spartak Pleven: 12.2 shots per match, Vihren Sandanski: 13.8.
Match halves
Spartak Pleven: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.80. Vihren Sandanski: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 1.20.
Goals by minute
Spartak Pleven: 61-75 (2 goals). Vihren Sandanski: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second League: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 43%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Vihren Sandanski remain unbeaten after 5 league matches, recording 2 wins and 3 draws, while Spartak Pleven have a record of 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 defeats. The visitors are particularly strong away from home: they have won both of their matches so far, averaging 2.5 goals scored and failing to score in none of them. Spartak score just 1 goal per home match and failed to find the net in 50% of those fixtures, despite creating chances worth an average of 1.75 xG. The hosts have kept no clean sheets in any home match, which, combined with the visitors’ 24% conversion rate and their average of 2.5 goals away from home, points towards Vihren. The hosts take more shots, 15.5 compared to 10.5, but with an identical number of 3.5 shots on target, their 6% conversion rate is clearly inferior to the visitors’ efficiency.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for goals from both sides is moderately positive: Spartak recorded BTTS in 100% of their matches so far, while Vihren did so in 50%, compared with the league average of 49%. The hosts have kept no clean sheets and concede an average of 1.33 goals, while the visitors score as many as 2.50 goals per match. Spartak creates plenty of chances, with an average xG of 1.94 and 7.67 shots on target, while Vihren’s defence allows an average of 1.42 xG. In their last five matches, Vihren recorded BTTS in 80% of cases, scoring 1.8 goals and conceding 1.2, which strengthens the expectation of goals from both sides. The risks to the pick are Vihren’s 50% clean-sheet rate this season and Spartak’s BTTS rate of only 40% in their last five matches; however, the hosts’ attacking advantage and Spartak’s poor defensive record support BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have surpassed the 1.5-goal mark in 100% of their matches so far, providing a strong argument for an open game. Spartak average 1.33 goals scored and 1.33 conceded, while Vihren score as many as 2.50 goals per match and concede an average of 1.00. The hosts do, however, create more chances, with an average xG of 1.94 and 7.67 shots on target, while Vihren’s defensive xG stands at 1.42. In their last five matches, the teams averaged a combined 2.6 and 3.0 goals respectively, with Vihren scoring 1.8 times per game during this period. The projected 2.92 goals strongly support Over 1.5, whereas the 2.5 and 3.5 lines are more vulnerable to a low-scoring game scenario.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Vihren Sandanski demonstrate clearly superior scoring efficiency: they average 2.50 goals per match, have won 100% of their games so far, and record 3.00 points per match, compared with Spartak’s average of 1.00 point. The visitors led at the break in 2 of their 2 matches this season, scoring an average of 1.00 goal before half-time and conceding none, while the hosts have scored just 0.33 goals per match during this period. In their last five appearances, Vihren have not once been behind at half-time, leading in 60% of matches, whereas Spartak were trailing at half-time in 40% of cases. The hosts create more chances, as reflected by an xG of 1.94 compared with 1.26 and 7.67 shots on target compared with 3.50, but their conversion rate is only 8%, versus a very high 24% for the visitors. After the break, Vihren continue to average 1.50 goals, making the most likely scenario an HT/FT outcome in which they take the lead before half-time and maintain it until the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Spartak Pleven | Vihren Sandanski | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 25% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Vihren Sandanski is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Spartak Pleven · 1.8 pts / match - Vihren Sandanski
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vihren Sandanski is 50% better for: goals scored per match.
1.2 goals / match - Spartak Pleven · 1.8 goals / match - Vihren Sandanski
Vihren Sandanski is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.4 goals / match - Spartak Pleven · 1.2 goals / match - Vihren Sandanski
Spartak Pleven scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Vihren Sandanski keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
Vihren Sandanski scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Spartak Pleven keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Spartak Pleven
Over / Under - Vihren Sandanski
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Vihren Sandanski is 120% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Spartak Pleven · 2.2 pts / match - Vihren Sandanski
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Spartak Pleven - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Vihren Sandanski - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 40%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Spartak Pleven
Vihren Sandanski
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).
Teams vs league
| Spartak Pleven | Liga | Vihren Sandanski | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.60 | 2.58 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 47% | ▲ 80% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 43% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 29% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 62% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 77% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Spartak Pleven 0 - 0 - 2 Vihren Sandanski. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Spartak Pleven vs Vihren Sandanski?
The Second League match finished Spartak Pleven 0:2 Vihren Sandanski. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Spartak Pleven and Vihren Sandanski?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Spartak Pleven won 0, Vihren Sandanski won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Spartak Pleven vs Vihren Sandanski?
Spartak Pleven score 1.20 goals per game on average and Vihren Sandanski 1.80. The Second League average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Spartak Pleven's matches and 80% of Vihren Sandanski's.
What form are Spartak Pleven and Vihren Sandanski in?
Over the last 5 games Spartak Pleven have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Vihren Sandanski 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Spartak Pleven vs Vihren Sandanski?
The statistical background for Spartak Pleven vs Vihren Sandanski — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


