Spartak Trnava vs Žilina: match statistics
Spartak Trnava vs Žilina: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Spartak Trnava played Žilina in Super Liga (Slovakia). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Venue: Štadión Antona Malatinského. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Spartak Trnava: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Žilina: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Spartak Trnava scores 2.40 and concedes 0.40 goals per match. Žilina scores 2.40 and concedes 2.20. League average: 3.55 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Spartak Trnava 40%, Žilina 80%. Over 2.5: Spartak Trnava 60%, Žilina 80%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 70%.
xG, shots and style
Spartak Trnava has higher xG: 1.96 vs 1.78. Spartak Trnava: 17.2 shots per match, Žilina: 16.2.
Match halves
Spartak Trnava: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 1.20. Žilina: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.80.
Goals by minute
Spartak Trnava: 31-45+ (6 goals). Žilina: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Super Liga: 3.55 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 70%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-2-0. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 25%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Spartak Trnava head into the match on the back of five consecutive wins, scoring 14 goals and conceding just 1, while Žilina have suffered 2 defeats over the same period and conceded as many as 10 goals. At home, the hosts create significantly more chances, averaging 18 shots and 7.33 shots on target per match, with an average xG of 2.07 compared with Žilina’s 1.39 away from home. The difference in defensive organisation is particularly significant, as Trnava concede just 0.33 goals per home match and keep a clean sheet in 67% of games, whereas the visitors concede an average of 1.5 goals with an xG against of 2.08. Žilina remain dangerous away from home, having won both of their matches so far and averaging 2.5 goals, but their high 22% conversion rate may be difficult to sustain with a significantly lower volume of chances created. Trnava’s advantage in current form, average possession of 59%, and chance-creation quality points towards a home win, although a goal for the visitors remains a realistic scenario.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Spartak Trnava are in excellent form: they have won their last five matches, scoring 14 goals and conceding just 1—an average of 0.2 goals per game. Žilina do average 1.8 goals over their last five matches, but their xG stands at 1.54, while Trnava’s defense allows opponents just 1.08 xG. The hosts should nevertheless find a way to score, as they create an average of 2.19 xG and register 6.67 shots on target per game, while Žilina have conceded 10 goals in their last five appearances. Although Žilina’s away record has produced BTTS - Yes in 80% of their last five matches, the significantly stronger signal is Trnava’s rate of just 20% in such games, combined with their near-perfect defensive record. Therefore, the more likely scenario is BTTS - No, meaning that at least one team will fail to score. This does not automatically imply a 0:0 result or that neither team will score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Spartak Trnava averaged 2.8 goals scored across their last five matches, while Žilina conceded 2.0 goals per game over the same period, clearly strengthening the case for at least two goals. The hosts created an average of 2.19 xG, while Žilina’s defense allowed opponents 1.66 xG, giving Spartak solid potential to score around 2 goals on their own. Žilina also averaged 1.8 goals scored in their last five matches and generated 1.54 xG, although Trnava’s excellent recent defensive record, with just 0.2 goals conceded on average, limits their projection. At least three goals were scored in 80% of the teams’ last five matches, while the league average of 3.43 goals further supports an open, high-scoring scenario. However, the strongest selection remains Over 1.5, as the projected total of 3.15 goals gives this line by far the highest probability.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Spartak Trnava have won their last five matches, averaging 2.8 goals scored and conceding just 0.2 per game, while Žilina lost 40% of their matches over the same period and allowed opponents to score 2.0 goals per game. The hosts were leading at the break in 60% of their last five appearances, were never behind at half-time, and conceded no goals during those opening 45 minutes. Žilina were level at half-time in 60% of their recent matches, with an average of just 0.4 goals scored before the break compared with Trnava’s 1.0. After the interval, Spartak still look more solid: they average 1.8 goals scored, concede 0.2, and win the second half in 60% of their matches, while Žilina concede an average of 1.8 goals after the break. Although the visitors began the season with three wins, current form and Trnava’s clear defensive advantage most strongly support the hosts leading at half-time and securing the full-time win.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Spartak Trnava | Žilina | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Spartak Trnava is 30% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Spartak Trnava · 2 pts / match - Žilina
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Spartak Trnava is 450% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.4 goals / match - Spartak Trnava · 2.2 goals / match - Žilina
Spartak Trnava scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Žilina keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
Žilina scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Spartak Trnava keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Spartak Trnava
Over / Under - Žilina
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Spartak Trnava is 120% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.2 pts / match - Spartak Trnava · 1 pts / match - Žilina
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Spartak Trnava - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 80%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Žilina - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 3.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Spartak Trnava
Žilina
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super Liga).
Teams vs league
| Spartak Trnava | Liga | Žilina | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.80 | 3.55 | ▲ 4.60 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 61% | ▲ 80% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 60% | 70% | ▲ 80% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 60% | 20% | • 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 80% | 82% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 60% | 88% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Spartak Trnava 2 - 2 - 0 Žilina. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 25% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Spartak Trnava vs Žilina?
The Super Liga match finished Spartak Trnava 1:3 Žilina. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Spartak Trnava and Žilina?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Spartak Trnava won 2, Žilina won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Spartak Trnava vs Žilina?
Spartak Trnava score 2.40 goals per game on average and Žilina 2.40. The Super Liga average is 3.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Spartak Trnava's matches and 80% of Žilina's.
What form are Spartak Trnava and Žilina in?
Over the last 5 games Spartak Trnava have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Žilina 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Spartak Trnava vs Žilina?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


