Slovakia - Super LigaŠtadión Antona MalatinskéhoData current as of 16 October 2026

Spartak Trnava vs Žilina: match statistics

Spartak Trnava crest
Spartak Trnava
1 : 3half-time 1:2
Žilina crest
Žilina

Spartak Trnava vs Žilina: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Spartak Trnava played Žilina in Super Liga (Slovakia). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Venue: Štadión Antona Malatinského. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Spartak Trnava: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Žilina: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Spartak Trnava scores 2.40 and concedes 0.40 goals per match. Žilina scores 2.40 and concedes 2.20. League average: 3.55 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Spartak Trnava 40%, Žilina 80%. Over 2.5: Spartak Trnava 60%, Žilina 80%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 70%.

xG, shots and style

Spartak Trnava has higher xG: 1.96 vs 1.78. Spartak Trnava: 17.2 shots per match, Žilina: 16.2.

Match halves

Spartak Trnava: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 1.20. Žilina: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.80.

Goals by minute

Spartak Trnava: 31-45+ (6 goals). Žilina: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super Liga: 3.55 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 70%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-2-0. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 25%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Spartak Trnava head into the match on the back of five consecutive wins, scoring 14 goals and conceding just 1, while Žilina have suffered 2 defeats over the same period and conceded as many as 10 goals. At home, the hosts create significantly more chances, averaging 18 shots and 7.33 shots on target per match, with an average xG of 2.07 compared with Žilina’s 1.39 away from home. The difference in defensive organisation is particularly significant, as Trnava concede just 0.33 goals per home match and keep a clean sheet in 67% of games, whereas the visitors concede an average of 1.5 goals with an xG against of 2.08. Žilina remain dangerous away from home, having won both of their matches so far and averaging 2.5 goals, but their high 22% conversion rate may be difficult to sustain with a significantly lower volume of chances created. Trnava’s advantage in current form, average possession of 59%, and chance-creation quality points towards a home win, although a goal for the visitors remains a realistic scenario.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Spartak Trnava are in excellent form: they have won their last five matches, scoring 14 goals and conceding just 1—an average of 0.2 goals per game. Žilina do average 1.8 goals over their last five matches, but their xG stands at 1.54, while Trnava’s defense allows opponents just 1.08 xG. The hosts should nevertheless find a way to score, as they create an average of 2.19 xG and register 6.67 shots on target per game, while Žilina have conceded 10 goals in their last five appearances. Although Žilina’s away record has produced BTTS - Yes in 80% of their last five matches, the significantly stronger signal is Trnava’s rate of just 20% in such games, combined with their near-perfect defensive record. Therefore, the more likely scenario is BTTS - No, meaning that at least one team will fail to score. This does not automatically imply a 0:0 result or that neither team will score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Spartak Trnava averaged 2.8 goals scored across their last five matches, while Žilina conceded 2.0 goals per game over the same period, clearly strengthening the case for at least two goals. The hosts created an average of 2.19 xG, while Žilina’s defense allowed opponents 1.66 xG, giving Spartak solid potential to score around 2 goals on their own. Žilina also averaged 1.8 goals scored in their last five matches and generated 1.54 xG, although Trnava’s excellent recent defensive record, with just 0.2 goals conceded on average, limits their projection. At least three goals were scored in 80% of the teams’ last five matches, while the league average of 3.43 goals further supports an open, high-scoring scenario. However, the strongest selection remains Over 1.5, as the projected total of 3.15 goals gives this line by far the highest probability.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Spartak Trnava have won their last five matches, averaging 2.8 goals scored and conceding just 0.2 per game, while Žilina lost 40% of their matches over the same period and allowed opponents to score 2.0 goals per game. The hosts were leading at the break in 60% of their last five appearances, were never behind at half-time, and conceded no goals during those opening 45 minutes. Žilina were level at half-time in 60% of their recent matches, with an average of just 0.4 goals scored before the break compared with Trnava’s 1.0. After the interval, Spartak still look more solid: they average 1.8 goals scored, concede 0.2, and win the second half in 60% of their matches, while Žilina concede an average of 1.8 goals after the break. Although the visitors began the season with three wins, current form and Trnava’s clear defensive advantage most strongly support the hosts leading at half-time and securing the full-time win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
17Shots13
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
5Shots on target7
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
1.78xG1.65
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
5Corners1
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
49Dangerous attacks47
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
11Fouls15
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
3Cards2
Spartak TrnavaŽilina

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.4Goals scored / match2.4
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
0.4Goals conceded / match2.2
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
52%Average possession57%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
7Shots on target / match6.2
Spartak TrnavaŽilina

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

17.2Shots per match16.2
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
7Shots on target6.2
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
14%Shot conversion14.8%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
52%Possession57%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
1.96xG for1.78
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
1.22xG against1.52
Spartak TrnavaŽilina

Shooting quality

Spartak Trnava: AttackingŽilina: Dominant
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
Accuracy (shots on target)41%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Spartak Trnava is 30% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Spartak Trnava · 2 pts / match - Žilina

Spartak Trnava
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
80% W20% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 at home
2-1-0
DWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.96Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Žilina
DWLWW
Season result split
60% W20% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Spartak Trnava is 450% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.4 goals / match - Spartak Trnava · 2.2 goals / match - Žilina

Spartak Trnava scoring profile: very strong

Spartak Trnava scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Žilina keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

Žilina scoring profile: strong

Žilina scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Spartak Trnava keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 matches).

12Goals scored (season)12
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
2Goals conceded (season)11
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
2.8Average goals in match4.6
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
12Goals scored (last 5)12
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
2Goals conceded (last 5)11
Spartak TrnavaŽilina

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
80%2 goals60%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
40%3 goals40%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
20%4 goals40%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina

How often they concede at least...

40%1 goal80%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
0%2 goals60%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
0%3 goals60%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
0%4 goals20%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time20%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
0%BTTS in both halves20%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
40%Scored in both halves40%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS80%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
40%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
40%BTTS - last 580%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time80%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time80%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Spartak Trnava is 120% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.2 pts / match - Spartak Trnava · 1 pts / match - Žilina

Spartak Trnava - half-time state
60% leading40% draw0% trailing
Žilina - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.2Points per match (1st half)1
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
1.2Goals scored (1st half)0.6
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
1.4Average goals (1st half)1.2
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
80%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
20%No goal before half-time60%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina

After half-time (2nd half)

1.8Points per match (2nd half)1.8
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
1.2Goals scored (2nd half)1.8
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
0.2Goals conceded (2nd half)1.6
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
1.4Average goals (2nd half)3.4
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
80%Clean sheet after half-time20%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina
40%No goal after half-time0%
Spartak TrnavaŽilina

Spartak Trnava - second-half results

40% W60% D0% L
11
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 80%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Žilina - second-half results

60% W0% D40% L
5
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Spartak Trnava - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.80
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+5+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Žilina - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.61.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.6
Average goals in match1.23.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%80%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Spartak Trnava
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
6
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Žilina
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
3
0
46-60
2
3
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.70
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.3 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-59%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Spartak Trnava

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.74
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.82
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
136%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
22%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Žilina

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.62
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.68
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super Liga).

Teams vs league

Spartak TrnavaLigaŽilina
Average goals in match▼ 2.803.55▲ 4.60
Both teams scored▼ 40%61%▲ 80%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 60%70%▲ 80%
Clean sheets▲ 60%20%• 20%
Goal before half-time▼ 80%82%▼ 60%
Goal after half-time▼ 60%88%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.55
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.76
Home goals / match
1.79
Away goals / match
+-2%
Home attack advantage
+-2%
Home defence advantage
+-3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
18%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ŽilinaYellow cardAlexander Narimanidze
  2. Spartak TrnavaGoalTimotej KudlickaAssist: Filip Trello
  3. Spartak TrnavaYellow cardTimotej Kudlicka
  4. ŽilinaGoalPatrik IľkoAssist: Michal Faško
  5. Spartak TrnavaYellow cardRoman Begala
  6. Spartak TrnavaYellow cardKristián Koštrna
  7. ŽilinaGoalPatrik IľkoAssist: Michal Faško
  8. Spartak TrnavaSubstitutionOn: Dávid BukovskýOff: Timotej Kudlicka
  9. Spartak TrnavaYellow cardDávid Bukovský
  10. ŽilinaSubstitutionOn: Samuel ĎatkoOff: Timotej Hranica
  11. ŽilinaYellow cardMiroslav Káčer

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Spartak Trnava 2 - 2 - 0 Žilina. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 25% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Spartak Trnava vs Žilina?

The Super Liga match finished Spartak Trnava 1:3 Žilina. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Spartak Trnava and Žilina?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Spartak Trnava won 2, Žilina won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Spartak Trnava vs Žilina?

Spartak Trnava score 2.40 goals per game on average and Žilina 2.40. The Super Liga average is 3.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Spartak Trnava's matches and 80% of Žilina's.

What form are Spartak Trnava and Žilina in?

Over the last 5 games Spartak Trnava have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Žilina 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Spartak Trnava vs Žilina?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.