United States - USL League OneData current as of 01 September 2026

Spokane Velocity vs Greenville Triumph: match statistics

Spokane Velocity vs Greenville Triumph: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Spokane Velocity played Greenville Triumph in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 23 August 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Spokane Velocity: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Greenville Triumph: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Spokane Velocity scores 1.42 and concedes 1.32 goals per match. Greenville Triumph scores 1.10 and concedes 1.65. League average: 2.92 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Spokane Velocity 47%, Greenville Triumph 45%. Over 2.5: Spokane Velocity 63%, Greenville Triumph 50%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

Greenville Triumph has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.41. Spokane Velocity: 11.8 shots per match, Greenville Triumph: 12.9.

Match halves

Spokane Velocity: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.74. Greenville Triumph: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

Spokane Velocity: 31-45+ (5 goals). Greenville Triumph: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL League One: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Spokane Velocity have a clear home advantage: they win 75% of their home matches, score an average of 1.92 goals per game there, and have not recorded a draw. Greenville Triumph score just 0.50 goals per away match, have lost 70% of their away fixtures, and failed to score in as many as 70% of them. The hosts are also in better form, having won 3 of their last five matches and conceded only 5 goals, while the visitors have managed just 1 victory. Spokane’s advantage is also evident in their attacking output: at home, they average 11.83 shots and 54% possession, compared with Greenville’s 10.7 shots and 47% possession away from home. Although the hosts’ home xG stands at 1.44 and the visitors allow opponents an xG of 1.60, a controlled Spokane victory is the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for a BTTS - No scenario is Greenville’s poor scoring efficiency in the competition: the team averages just 0.5 goals per match and failed to score in 70% of its games. BTTS occurred in Greenville matches in only 20% of cases this season, well below the league average of 56%, despite Spokane conceding an average of 1.7 goals. The hosts should have good conditions to score, as they record 1.7 goals and 1.7 xG per match, while Greenville concedes an average of 1.6 goals and keeps a clean sheet in only 10% of matches. However, the visitors’ last five games have been more productive offensively, with an average of 1.6 goals, an xG of 1.64 and BTTS in 80% of matches, which significantly reduces confidence in the BTTS - No pick. Despite this recent improvement, Greenville’s long-term inability to score more often suggests that at least one team—primarily the visitors—will fail to find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Spokane average 1.7 goals per match, while Greenville concede 1.6, giving the hosts a clear basis for creating several scoring chances. In their last five matches, Spokane have scored 11 goals, or 2.2 per match, whereas Greenville have both scored and conceded an average of 1.6 goals during this period. The 1.5 line has been surpassed in 80% of Spokane’s matches and 70% of Greenville’s, while both teams very rarely finish matches without scoring. The hosts average 15.2 shots and 5.4 shots on target per match, clearly more than the visitors’ 10.7 shots and 3.1 shots on target. The projected total of 2.80 goals points to an Over 1.5 advantage, while the teams’ divergent Over 2.5 results do not provide an equally strong signal at the higher line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Spokane Velocity have a clear advantage over the course of the season, averaging 1.7 goals per match compared with Greenville’s 0.5, while the visitors have lost 70% of their matches and won only 10%. The hosts are also significantly more dangerous in the first half, scoring an average of 1.0 goals compared with the opponents’ 0.2; they led at the break in 33% of matches, whereas Greenville did so in only 10%. Spokane also hold the edge in chance quality, recording an xG of 1.70, 5.4 shots on target per match and an 11% conversion rate, compared with the visitors’ 1.28 xG, 3.1 shots on target and 5% conversion rate. In their last five matches, Spokane won 60% of games and scored 2.2 goals per match, while Greenville, despite a run of draws, still conceded an average of 1.6 goals. The most likely scenario is therefore for the hosts to take the lead at the break and maintain it until the final whistle, corresponding to the HT/FT pick 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
16Shots9
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
9Shots on target2
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
2.02xG1.08
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
8Corners5
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
53Dangerous attacks52
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
12Fouls6
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
4Cards1
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
1.42Goals scored / match1.1
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
1.32Goals conceded / match1.65
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
52%Average possession46%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
3.63Shots on target / match4.25
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.79Shots per match12.95
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
3.63Shots on target4.25
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
12.1%Shot conversion8.5%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
52%Possession46%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
1.41xG for1.49
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
1.37xG against1.51
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph

Shooting quality

Spokane Velocity: BalancedGreenville Triumph: Balanced
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
Accuracy (shots on target)31%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Spokane Velocity is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Spokane Velocity · 1.2 pts / match - Greenville Triumph

Spokane Velocity
LWWWL
Season result split
53% W11% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-2-7
1.68 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-0-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Greenville Triumph
WDLDD
Season result split
25% W25% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-10
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-7
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.89BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Spokane Velocity is 29% better for: goals scored per match.

1.42 goals / match - Spokane Velocity · 1.1 goals / match - Greenville Triumph

Spokane Velocity is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.32 goals / match - Spokane Velocity · 1.65 goals / match - Greenville Triumph

Spokane Velocity scoring profile: very strong

Spokane Velocity scores in 68% of matches (13 of 19 matches), while Greenville Triumph keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 matches).

Greenville Triumph scoring profile: strong

Greenville Triumph scores in 55% of matches (11 of 20 matches), while Spokane Velocity keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 matches).

27Goals scored (season)22
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
25Goals conceded (season)33
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
2.74Average goals in match2.75
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
10Goals scored (last 5)8
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal55%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
47%2 goals25%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
26%3 goals25%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
0%4 goals5%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph

How often they concede at least...

74%1 goal85%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
26%2 goals55%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
21%3 goals20%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
11%4 goals5%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

45%
Greenville Triumph - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.9 of 20 matches
58%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time20%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
0%BTTS in both halves5%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
26%Scored in both halves20%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph

BTTS and goal count

42%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
21%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
40%BTTS - last 580%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Spokane Velocity is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.47 pts / match - Spokane Velocity · 1.15 pts / match - Greenville Triumph

Spokane Velocity - half-time state
37% leading37% draw26% trailing
Greenville Triumph - half-time state
20% leading55% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)1.15
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
0.68Goals scored (1st half)0.55
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.65
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
1.32Average goals (1st half)1.2
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
58%Clean sheet before half-time55%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
53%No goal before half-time60%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph

After half-time (2nd half)

1.32Points per match (2nd half)0.85
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
0.74Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.85
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
1.42Average goals (2nd half)1.25
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
53%Clean sheet after half-time40%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph
53%No goal after half-time70%
Spokane VelocityGreenville Triumph

Spokane Velocity - second-half results

37% W21% R42% P
28
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Greenville Triumph - second-half results

15% W40% R45% P
23
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding125%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Spokane Velocity - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.22.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Greenville Triumph - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Spokane Velocity
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
4
1
16-30
5
6
31-45
5
5
46-60
5
2
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Greenville Triumph
ScoredConceded
7
7
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
6
31-45
4
4
46-60
4
5
61-75
0
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Spokane Velocity

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Greenville Triumph

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 32% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

Spokane VelocityLigaGreenville Triumph
Average goals in match 2.742.92 2.75
Both teams scored 47%58% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%59% 50%
Clean sheets 26%24% 15%
Goal before half-time 74%71% 65%
Goal after half-time 84%80% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.92
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / match
1.14
Away goals / match
+56%
Home attack advantage
+36%
Home defence advantage
+31%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Greenville TriumphGoalZane Bubb
  2. Spokane VelocityGoalLucky Onyebuchi OparaAssist: Derek Waldeck
  3. Greenville TriumphYellow cardPatrick Seagrist
  4. Greenville TriumphGoalAnthony PattiAssist: Patrick Seagrist
  5. Greenville TriumphSubstitutionOn: Devin BoyceOff: Kimito Fritz
  6. Spokane VelocityYellow cardIbrahim Janis Covi
  7. Spokane VelocitySubstitutionOn: Mensah Moses Nyarko FenyiOff: Joe Gallardo
  8. Spokane VelocityYellow cardSean Lewis
  9. Greenville TriumphSubstitutionOn: Ezra WhiteOff: Anthony Patti
  10. Spokane VelocityYellow cardAndre Lewis
  11. Spokane VelocityYellow cardCamron Miller

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Spokane Velocity 1 - 0 - 1 Greenville Triumph. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Spokane Velocity FC
0 : 1
Greenville Triumph SC
Greenville Triumph SC
0 : 4
Spokane Velocity FC

FAQ

What was the result of Spokane Velocity vs Greenville Triumph?

The USL League One match finished Spokane Velocity 2:1 Greenville Triumph. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Spokane Velocity and Greenville Triumph?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Spokane Velocity won 1, Greenville Triumph won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Spokane Velocity vs Greenville Triumph?

Spokane Velocity score 1.42 goals per game on average and Greenville Triumph 1.10. The USL League One average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Spokane Velocity's matches and 45% of Greenville Triumph's.

What form are Spokane Velocity and Greenville Triumph in?

Over the last 5 games Spokane Velocity have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Greenville Triumph 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Spokane Velocity vs Greenville Triumph?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Spokane Velocity vs Greenville Triumph: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.