Sporting Cristal vs ADT: match statistics
Sporting Cristal vs ADT: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Sporting Cristal played ADT in Primera División (Peru). The match was played on 24 May 2026. Venue: Estadio Alberto Gallardo. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Sporting Cristal: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. ADT: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Sporting Cristal scores 1.60 and concedes 1.73 goals per match. ADT scores 1.33 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.61 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sporting Cristal 80%, ADT 40%. Over 2.5: Sporting Cristal 73%, ADT 40%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
Sporting Cristal has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.46. Sporting Cristal: 15.3 shots per match, ADT: 13.6.
Match halves
Sporting Cristal: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.00. ADT: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.80.
Goals by minute
Sporting Cristal: 76-90+ (8 goals). ADT: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.61 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sporting Cristal has a clear offensive edge at home: they score an average of 2.14 goals per home match and register average xG of 1.88, with 17.57 shots and 6.14 shots on target, while ADT away averages 1.00 goals, xG 1.10, 9.86 shots and 4.29 shots on target. The hosts have no issue scoring at home — in 0% of home matches they failed to score, and their conversion rate is 12% versus the visitors' 10%. However, Sporting is in poor overall form over the last 5 matches: 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, 6 goals scored and 11 conceded (2.2 per match), yielding only 0.4 points on average. ADT are in better recent rhythm — in their last 5 matches they have 3 wins and 2 draws, 11 goals scored and only 4 conceded (0.8 per match), averaging 2.2 points per match. Considering the home xG advantage (1.88 vs 1.10), higher shot volume and no home blanks, alongside ADT’s superior recent defensive form, the most likely outcome remains a Sporting win; I estimate 55% for 1, 22% for a draw and 23% for an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I pick BTTS (both teams to score) — Yes 65% vs No 35%, because recent form strongly favors goal exchange. Sporting Cristal had BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches and conceded on average 2.2 goals per match (11 conceded in 5), while ADT averaged 2.2 goals per match in that period (11 scored in 5). Additionally Sporting generates more chances: home xG is 1.79 and they average 6.5 shots on target per match versus ADT who have xG against of 1.12 and 4.29 shots on target, increasing the likelihood Sporting will find the net. Contradictory season signals (Sporting has only 38% of matches with BTTS and 50% clean sheets, and ADT failed to score in 43% of away games) reduce confidence, but a high league BTTS rate of 56% and recent stats (11 goals by ADT and 11 goals conceded by Sporting in 5 matches) support choosing the both teams to score scenario as the strongest signal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model projects 1.46 xG for Sporting Cristal (attacking xG 1.79 vs opponent average xG 1.12 → mean 1.46) and 1.20 xG for ADT (attacking xG 1.10 vs Sporting conceded xG 1.30 → 1.20), totaling 2.66 xG. Season metrics show Over 1.5 in 63% of Sporting matches and 57% of ADT matches, and additionally Over 0.5 occurs in 100% of Sporting games and 86% of ADT games, which increases the probability of at least two goals. Sporting averages 16.88 shots and 6.5 on target per match versus ADT’s 9.86 and 4.29; at a 10% conversion rate this corresponds to approximately 1.69 and 0.99 goals, which corroborates the combined scoring potential of ~2.66. Therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (I estimate ~76%), while the 2.5 line is only moderately favored (~56%) due to season Over 2.5: 38% (Sporting) and 43% (ADT). Recommendation: play Over 1.5 — expected goals Sporting 1.46, ADT 1.20, total 2.66.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Sporting Cristal has a clear lead at the break — they led at half-time in 5 of their matches so far (63%) and score on average 0.75 goals by half-time versus ADT’s 0.29. Over the full match Cristal averages 1.63 goals with an xG of 1.79 and 16.88 shots (6.5 on target), while ADT averages 1.00 goals, xG 1.10 and 9.86 shots (4.29 on target), indicating greater chance creation for the home side. Cristal win 50% of their matches this season versus ADT’s 14% and keep a clean sheet in 50% of games, so the most likely scenario is a lead at the break and a home win. Based on these figures I assign a 48% probability to the 1/1 Half-Time/Full-Time outcome, while acknowledging the risk of a turnaround. Taking into account Cristal’s poor form over the last 5 matches (0% wins) and ADT’s good run (60% wins), I allocate 18% to X/1 and 12% to X/X as realistic alternatives.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sporting Cristal | ADT | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
ADT is 450% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - Sporting Cristal · 2.2 pts / match - ADT
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sporting Cristal is 20% better for: goals scored per match.
1.6 goals / match - Sporting Cristal · 1.33 goals / match - ADT
ADT is 53% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.73 goals / match - Sporting Cristal · 1.13 goals / match - ADT
Sporting Cristal scores in 93% of matches (14 of 15 matches), while ADT keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).
ADT scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Sporting Cristal keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sporting Cristal
Over / Under - ADT
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
ADT is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / match - Sporting Cristal · 1.4 pts / match - ADT
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sporting Cristal - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 27%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
ADT - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Sporting Cristal
ADT
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Sporting Cristal | Liga | ADT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.33 | 2.61 | ▼ 2.47 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 80% | 55% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 73% | 51% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 26% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 64% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 79% | ▼ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Sporting Cristal 1 - 0 - 1 ADT. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Sporting Cristal vs ADT?
The Primera División match finished Sporting Cristal 2:1 ADT. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sporting Cristal and ADT?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Sporting Cristal won 1, ADT won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sporting Cristal vs ADT?
Sporting Cristal score 1.60 goals per game on average and ADT 1.33. The Primera División average is 2.61 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Sporting Cristal's matches and 40% of ADT's.
What form are Sporting Cristal and ADT in?
Over the last 5 games Sporting Cristal have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and ADT 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sporting Cristal vs ADT?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.