Sporting JAX vs Lexington: match statistics
Sporting JAX vs Lexington: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Sporting JAX played Lexington in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 5 September 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Current form
Sporting JAX: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Lexington: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Sporting JAX scores 1.23 and concedes 2.64 goals per match. Lexington scores 1.41 and concedes 1.18. League average: 2.71 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sporting JAX 64%, Lexington 50%. Over 2.5: Sporting JAX 73%, Lexington 50%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Lexington has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.04. Sporting JAX: 8.6 shots per match, Lexington: 12.4.
Match halves
Sporting JAX: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.68. Lexington: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.86.
Goals by minute
Sporting JAX: 76-90+ (6 goals). Lexington: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Lexington sit 12th, while Sporting JAX are only 25th, and over the course of the season the visitors have won 9 matches compared with just 2 victories for the hosts. The strongest argument in favour of the away side is their defence: Lexington concede an average of 1.3 goals away from home, whereas Sporting JAX concede as many as 2.9 at home and have yet to keep a single clean sheet. The hosts are also in poor form, having lost 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring just 4 goals and conceding 14. Lexington have conceded only 4 goals in their last five games, while their average away xG stands at 1.27 compared with 1.15 for Sporting JAX, indicating slightly higher-quality chances created. The visitors are not particularly clinical on the road and fail to score in 40% of their away matches, so a draw remains a realistic outcome; however, the extent of the hosts’ defensive problems points towards a Lexington victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, as Sporting JAX kept a clean sheet in 50% of their matches, while Lexington failed to score in 40% of their games. Both teams are also in poor offensive form: over their last 5 appearances, they averaged just 0.8 goals per game each, with BTTS occurring in 40% and only 20% of those matches, respectively. During this period, Lexington conceded just 4 goals, or 0.8 per match, making it difficult for the hosts to break through despite their season average of 1.58 goals scored. Sporting JAX have a weak recent defensive record, conceding an average of 2.8 goals, but Lexington’s low scoring output and xG of 1.29 over their last five matches more strongly support a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile points to a moderate goal tally: Sporting JAX average 1.58 goals, while Lexington average 1.20, with a combined projected total of 2.45 goals. Lexington nevertheless have a solid defensive organization, conceding an average of 1.30 goals and keeping a clean sheet in 20% of matches, while Sporting JAX have averaged no more than one goal in their last five appearances, scoring just 4 goals. Historically, both teams have recorded at least three goals in 50% of their matches, but only 33% of the home sides’ games and 30% of the away sides’ games have gone Over 3.5 goals. In addition, Lexington’s average xG stands at 1.27, while the hosts, despite recording 1.56 xG across the season, have generated just 1.02 xG per match over their last five fixtures. The strongest signal is therefore Under 3.5 goals, as the season-long data and current attacking output clearly limit the likelihood of four goals being scored.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Sporting JAX win, as the home side were level after 45 minutes in 67% of their matches, compared with 40% for Lexington. The first halves of both teams are typically tight: Sporting average 0.42 goals in the opening period and Lexington 0.70, while they have kept a clean sheet before the break in 75% and 70% of matches, respectively. After the interval, the home side’s advantage grows significantly: they average 1.17 goals compared with Lexington’s 0.50 and collect an average of 1.75 points in the second half, compared with 0.70 for their opponents. Sporting’s overall season record also supports a full-time victory: they have won 58% of their matches and average 1.83 points per game, whereas Lexington have won only 20% of their fixtures and average 0.90 points per game. The hosts’ recent form is poor, with 4 defeats in their last 5 matches, but Lexington have failed to score before half-time in each of their last 5 appearances, reinforcing the scenario of a cautious opening and a decisive second half.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sporting JAX | Lexington | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Lexington is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Sporting JAX · 1.2 pts / match - Lexington
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lexington is 15% better for: goals scored per match.
1.23 goals / match - Sporting JAX · 1.41 goals / match - Lexington
Lexington is 124% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.64 goals / match - Sporting JAX · 1.18 goals / match - Lexington
Sporting JAX scores in 64% of matches (14 of 22 matches), while Lexington keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 matches).
Lexington scores in 73% of matches (16 of 22 matches), while Sporting JAX keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sporting JAX
Over / Under - Lexington
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Lexington is 35% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.91 pts / match - Sporting JAX · 1.23 pts / match - Lexington
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sporting JAX - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 9%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Lexington - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -8 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Sporting JAX
Lexington
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Sporting JAX | Liga | Lexington | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.86 | 2.71 | ▼ 2.59 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 54% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 73% | 49% | • 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 28% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 65% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 95% | 79% | ▲ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Sporting JAX vs Lexington?
The USL Championship match finished Sporting JAX 3:2 Lexington. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Sporting JAX vs Lexington?
Sporting JAX score 1.23 goals per game on average and Lexington 1.41. The USL Championship average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Sporting JAX's matches and 50% of Lexington's.
What form are Sporting JAX and Lexington in?
Over the last 5 games Sporting JAX have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Lexington 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sporting JAX vs Lexington?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


