Sportist Svoge vs Dunav 2010: match statistics
Sportist Svoge vs Dunav 2010: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Sportist Svoge played Dunav 2010 in Second League (Bulgaria). The match was played on 26 April 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Current form
Sportist Svoge: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Dunav 2010: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Sportist Svoge scores 0.81 and concedes 1.56 goals per match. Dunav 2010 scores 1.67 and concedes 0.33. League average: 2.49 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sportist Svoge 37%, Dunav 2010 26%. Over 2.5: Sportist Svoge 48%, Dunav 2010 33%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
Dunav 2010 has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.21. Sportist Svoge: 8.1 shots per match, Dunav 2010: 11.5.
Match halves
Sportist Svoge: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.37. Dunav 2010: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 0.85.
Goals by minute
Sportist Svoge: 31-45+ (5 goals). Dunav 2010: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second League: 2.49 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an away win (Dunav 2010): the visiting side has 18 wins, 8 draws and only 1 loss this season versus Sportist Svoge’s 6 wins, 7 draws and 14 losses. The goal difference is clear — Dunav have 45 goals scored compared to the hosts’ 22, and away they average 1.46 goals scored and only 0.46 conceded, while Sportist at home average 0.77 scored and 1.38 conceded. The visitors are also more efficient with shots (conversion 15% vs 9%) and average 10.08 attempts with 5.31 on target away compared to the hosts’ 9.42 attempts and 5.08 on target at home; additionally Dunav keep a clean sheet in 54% of away matches, while Sportist have 0% clean sheets at home and fail to score in 54% of home games. A warning is recent form over the last 5 matches: Dunav are without a win in their last five (0-4-1) and have scored only 1 goal, while Sportist have 1 win and 2 goals in their last 5; both teams average 0.8 points per game in this period, which lowers expected effectiveness. Considering the seasonal superiority of the visitors in efficiency and defence and the very low home productivity of the hosts, I assess Dunav’s chances of winning at 68%, draw 20% and a Sportist upset at 12%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The primary signal against BTTS is the home side's defense: Sportist Svoge concedes on average 0.21 goals per match and has an 86% clean sheet rate, and the season share of home matches with both teams scoring is only 14%. Dunav has a higher season BTTS of 38%, but this is still below the league average of 45%, and in the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in only 20% of cases for both home and away teams. Offensively the home team generates more chances: home xG 1.58 vs away xG 1.38, average shots 12.79 vs 10.08 and shots on target 7.36 vs 5.31, giving them a qualitative chances advantage. It is worth noting, however, that despite the away side's low season average goals conceded of 0.46, their xG against is 1.37, which suggests they statistically allow more opportunities than results indicate; the home xG against is 0.71, confirming the defensive edge. Given the very low season BTTS for the home team at 14%, 86% clean sheets and low average goals in the last 5 matches (0.4 and 0.2), I assess BTTS 'No' as more likely and assign it 75% versus 25% for 'Yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Home season xG is 1.58 versus xG conceded to Dunav 1.37, yielding a raw projection of ~1.48 for Svoge, while Dunav has xG 1.38 versus xG conceded to Svoge 0.71 (~1.05 raw). In the last 5 matches form xG declined (last 5 xG: home 0.99 and Dunav 0.96), and the home side conceded on average 1.2 goals in the last 5 while the visitors conceded 0.4, so combining seasonal and recent data I estimate 1.23 goals for Svoge and 1.07 for Dunav, total 2.30. Seasonal rates confirm a high incidence of matches >1.5 goals: Svoge 71% and Dunav 62%, while Over 2.5 occurred less frequently (36% and 31%). Svoge averages 12.79 shots (7.36 on target) vs Dunav 10.08 (5.31 on target) with a 15% conversion for both, which supports at least two goals in the match but does not provide a strong edge for >2.5 goals. Therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (high historical 71%/62% and projected 2.30 goals), while Over 2.5 is marginal (~43%) and Over 3.5 has low probability consistent with seasonal 21%/15%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Sportist Svoge led at the break in 9 matches, i.e. in 64% of games; their average goals at half-time is 1.00 with an average conceded of 0.00, and they kept a clean sheet at the break in 100% of matches. Over the season the hosts score 1.86 goals and concede 0.21 per match, keeping a full-time clean sheet in 86% of games, whereas Dunav has 1.46 goals scored and 0.46 conceded, which indicates a clear defensive advantage for the hosts. The hosts generate higher xG (1.58 vs 1.38) and record more shots on target (7.36 vs 5.31), so control at half-time has a high likelihood of translating into the final result. On this basis the strongest scenario is 1/1 (lead at the break and full-time victory for the hosts) at 55%, alternatives are draw at half-time and home win (X/1) 15% and draw/draw (X/X) 12%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sportist Svoge | Dunav 2010 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 55% | 55% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.18 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Dunav 2010 is 106% better for: goals scored per match.
0.81 goals / match - Sportist Svoge · 1.67 goals / match - Dunav 2010
Dunav 2010 is 373% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.56 goals / match - Sportist Svoge · 0.33 goals / match - Dunav 2010
Sportist Svoge scores in 48% of matches (13 of 27 matches), while Dunav 2010 keeps a clean sheet in 70% (19 of 27 matches).
Dunav 2010 scores in 78% of matches (21 of 27 matches), while Sportist Svoge keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sportist Svoge
Over / Under - Dunav 2010
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Dunav 2010 is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.04 pts / match - Sportist Svoge · 2.07 pts / match - Dunav 2010
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sportist Svoge - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Dunav 2010 - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Sportist Svoge
Dunav 2010
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).
Teams vs league
| Sportist Svoge | Liga | Dunav 2010 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.37 | 2.49 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 37% | 45% | ▼ 26% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 48% | 44% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 33% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 59% | 70% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 70% | 73% | • 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Sportist Svoge 0 - 0 - 1 Dunav 2010. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Sportist Svoge vs Dunav 2010?
The Second League match finished Sportist Svoge 3:2 Dunav 2010. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Sportist Svoge vs Dunav 2010?
Sportist Svoge score 0.81 goals per game on average and Dunav 2010 1.67. The Second League average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Sportist Svoge's matches and 26% of Dunav 2010's.
What form are Sportist Svoge and Dunav 2010 in?
Over the last 5 games Sportist Svoge have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Dunav 2010 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sportist Svoge vs Dunav 2010?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


