Sportivo Carapeguá vs Fernando de la Mora: match statistics
Sportivo Carapeguá vs Fernando de la Mora: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Sportivo Carapeguá played Fernando de la Mora in Division Intermedia (Paraguay). The match was played on 9 August 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Sportivo Carapeguá: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Fernando de la Mora: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Sportivo Carapeguá scores 1.18 and concedes 1.71 goals per match. Fernando de la Mora scores 1.12 and concedes 1.47. League average: 2.55 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sportivo Carapeguá 59%, Fernando de la Mora 59%. Over 2.5: Sportivo Carapeguá 47%, Fernando de la Mora 47%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 42%.
xG, shots and style
Fernando de la Mora has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.25. Sportivo Carapeguá: 9.1 shots per match, Fernando de la Mora: 11.9.
Match halves
Sportivo Carapeguá: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.71. Fernando de la Mora: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.76.
Goals by minute
Sportivo Carapeguá: 31-45+ (7 goals). Fernando de la Mora: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Division Intermedia: 2.55 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 42%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sportivo Carapeguá hold a slight advantage in current form, taking 8 points from their last 5 matches compared with Fernando de la Mora’s 7, although the visitors remain unbeaten during this period thanks to 4 draws. Fernando de la Mora average 1.38 goals per away match, compared with Carapeguá’s 1.13 goals at home, and also create more chances: 10.38 shots and an xG of 1.41 versus the hosts’ 7.5 shots and xG of 1.02. However, the home side are significantly more solid defensively on their own ground, conceding an average of 1.25 goals with an xG against of 0.93, while the visitors allow opponents an xG of 1.45 and concede 1.5 goals away from home. Both teams have identical home-away records: 50% wins, 13% draws and 38% defeats, which, combined with the visitors’ strong tendency to share the points, points towards a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - Yes pick is supported by a strong current trend, as both Sportivo Carapeguá and Fernando de la Mora have seen both teams score in 80% of their last 5 matches. During this period, the hosts averaged 1.2 goals scored and 1.0 conceded, while the visitors scored 1.6 goals and conceded 1.4. Across the season, the BTTS rate stands at 56% for Carapeguá and 63% for Fernando de la Mora, both at least matching the league average of 56%. The defences provide no strong clean-sheet signal: the hosts kept a clean sheet in only 11% of matches, compared with 25% for the visitors, while conceding an average of 1.44 and 1.50 goals respectively. The main risk remains Carapeguá's low season scoring output, with an average of 0.89 goals, although their xG of 1.59 and 3.33 shots on target per match suggest a realistic chance of finding the net.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile points to approximately 2.51 goals: the hosts average 1.59 xG, while Fernando de la Mora average 1.41 xG, although over their last five matches these figures have dropped to 1.21 and 1.06, respectively. Sportivo Carapeguá score just 0.89 goals per game in the league, and neither team has scored three goals in an individual match in more than 25% of their appearances. The 3.5 line has not been exceeded in 67% of the hosts’ matches and 62% of the visitors’ games, which is a clear argument for a limited goal ceiling. At the same time, both teams had BTTS in 80% of their matches over the last five rounds, making a 1:1 or 1:2 scoreline more likely than a very low-scoring game, while still supporting Under 3.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as both teams were level after 45 minutes in 60% of their last five matches, while across the season this occurred in 44% of Carapeguá’s games and 63% of Fernando de la Mora’s. First halves are typically tight: the hosts average just 0.22 goals in them and the visitors 0.50, while the corresponding overall averages are 0.78 and 0.88. Fernando de la Mora have a clearly superior record over the full campaign, averaging 1.63 points per match, with a 50% win rate and 1.38 goals scored, compared with Carapeguá’s 0.78 points, 11% win rate and 0.89 goals. However, as many as 80% of Fernando de la Mora’s recent matches have ended in draws. The game should open up after the break, with goals scored in 89% of the hosts’ matches and 88% of the visitors’ matches, but both teams’ draw-oriented profiles, along with Carapeguá’s improvement to 1.6 points per match across their last five games, support the expectation that the points will be shared.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sportivo Carapeguá | Fernando de la Mora | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Sportivo Carapeguá is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Sportivo Carapeguá · 1.4 pts / match - Fernando de la Mora
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sportivo Carapeguá is 5% better for: goals scored per match.
1.18 goals / match - Sportivo Carapeguá · 1.12 goals / match - Fernando de la Mora
Fernando de la Mora is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.71 goals / match - Sportivo Carapeguá · 1.47 goals / match - Fernando de la Mora
Sportivo Carapeguá scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Fernando de la Mora keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 matches).
Fernando de la Mora scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Sportivo Carapeguá keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sportivo Carapeguá
Over / Under - Fernando de la Mora
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fernando de la Mora is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Sportivo Carapeguá · 1.06 pts / match - Fernando de la Mora
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sportivo Carapeguá - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Fernando de la Mora - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Sportivo Carapeguá
Fernando de la Mora
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Division Intermedia).
Teams vs league
| Sportivo Carapeguá | Liga | Fernando de la Mora | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.88 | 2.55 | • 2.59 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 59% | 56% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 47% | 42% | ▲ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 26% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 66% | • 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 65% | 76% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Sportivo Carapeguá 1 - 1 - 1 Fernando de la Mora. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Sportivo Carapeguá vs Fernando de la Mora?
The Division Intermedia match finished Sportivo Carapeguá 2:0 Fernando de la Mora. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sportivo Carapeguá and Fernando de la Mora?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Sportivo Carapeguá won 1, Fernando de la Mora won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sportivo Carapeguá vs Fernando de la Mora?
Sportivo Carapeguá score 1.18 goals per game on average and Fernando de la Mora 1.12. The Division Intermedia average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Sportivo Carapeguá's matches and 59% of Fernando de la Mora's.
What form are Sportivo Carapeguá and Fernando de la Mora in?
Over the last 5 games Sportivo Carapeguá have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Fernando de la Mora 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sportivo Carapeguá vs Fernando de la Mora?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sportivo Carapeguá vs Fernando de la Mora: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


