Sreenidi Deccan vs Aizawl: match statistics
Sreenidi Deccan vs Aizawl: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Sreenidi Deccan played Aizawl in I-League (India). The match was played on 5 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Sreenidi Deccan: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Aizawl: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Sreenidi Deccan scores 1.17 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. Aizawl scores 1.83 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.57 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sreenidi Deccan 50%, Aizawl 83%. Over 2.5: Sreenidi Deccan 33%, Aizawl 67%. League level: BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 43%.
xG, shots and style
Aizawl has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.40. Sreenidi Deccan: 9.8 shots per match, Aizawl: 10.5.
Match halves
Sreenidi Deccan: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.83. Aizawl: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.33.
Goals by minute
Sreenidi Deccan: 46-60 (2 goals). Aizawl: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
I-League: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 43%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sreenidi Deccan possess a clear home advantage: they sit 2nd in the table versus Aizawl’s 6th place and remain unbeaten at home (0% losses), conceding only 0.67 goals per home game. Aizawl, although creating more opportunities (avg. 14 shots and 4.5 on target per away match) and posting an away xG of 1.65, concede as many as 2.5 goals per away game and have no clean sheets (0%). In attack the hosts average 1.33 goals per home game with an xG of 1.41 and shot conversion of 12%, while the visitors score 1.5 goals away with an xG of 1.65 and a conversion rate of 11%, indicating greater chance creation by the visitors but lower efficiency in converting chances. In the last 5 matches Sreenidi have scored 6 and conceded 4, averaging 1.6 points per game, whereas Aizawl have scored 10 and conceded 11 with an average of 1.4 points per game, highlighting the visitors’ greater defensive instability. Considering Sreenidi’s unbeaten home record, the hosts’ defensive edge (0.67 vs 2.5 goals conceded) and Aizawl’s lack of away wins, I back a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams give a strong BTTS signal: Sreenidi Deccan have 75% of their season matches with both teams scoring, Aizawl 100%, and in the last 5 matches the rates are 60% and 80% respectively. Aizawl concede on average 2.5 goals per match this season (2.2 in the last 5), while Sreenidi concede 1.75 seasonally (0.8 in the last five), indicating both sides regularly allow goals. Offensively Aizawl record 1.5 goals scored this season with xG 1.65 (last 5: 2.0 and xG 1.43), whereas Sreenidi have 2.0 goals seasonally with xG 1.32 and a high shot conversion of 23% versus Aizawl’s 11%, despite fewer shots (8.75 vs 14.0). Additionally both teams have 0% clean sheets this season, and the league BTTS rate is 67% with an average of 2.57 goals per match, which reinforces the goal-exchange scenario. In light of these numbers I tip BTTS = Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The combined xG is 1.32 (Sreenidi) + 1.65 (Aizawl) = 2.97, while the seasonal goals average is 2.0 + 1.5 = 3.5, indicating significant scoring potential. In the last 5 matches Sreenidi scored an average of 1.2 goals, Aizawl 2.0 — combined 3.2 goals; additionally Aizawl concedes 2.5 on average and Sreenidi 1.75, which increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Both teams have a seasonal Over 1.5 rate of 100%, and BTTS percentages of 75% (Sreenidi) and 100% (Aizawl); Over 2.5 occurred in 75% of Sreenidi’s matches and 50% of Aizawl’s. Considering the summed xG of 2.97, the seasonal 3.5 and the recent 3.2, I estimate expected goals of 1.47 for Sreenidi and 1.68 for Aizawl (total 3.15), which translates to approximate probabilities: Over 1.5 ~90%, Over 2.5 ~65% and Over 3.5 ~40%. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (recommended bet: 'Over 1.5'), since both teams have 100% of matches above 1.5, high BTTS rates and an expected 3.15 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Sreenidi Deccan average 1.75 points per match versus Aizawl’s 0.5 and have a 50% home win rate against the visitors’ 0%, so the home side are favoured to win. The strongest Half-Time signal is a draw: the hosts were level at the break in 75% of home games, and across the last five matches a draw at Half-Time occurred for both teams in around 60% of cases. Aizawl have higher xG (1.65 vs 1.32) and more shots (14 vs 8.75), which increases their chances of scoring before the break (leadingAtTheBreak percentage_away 50%), but their low shot conversion of 11% versus the hosts’ 23% and weaker PPG mean they often lose the lead after Half-Time. Sreenidi are strong in the second half (on average 1.5 goals after the break and 3 goals in minutes 61–75), while Aizawl average 1.0 goal after Half-Time, so the most likely Half-Time/Full-Time scenario is a draw at Half-Time with a home turnaround and a home win by Full-Time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sreenidi Deccan | Aizawl | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 48% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Sreenidi Deccan is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Sreenidi Deccan · 1.4 pts / match - Aizawl
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Aizawl is 56% better for: goals scored per match.
1.17 goals / match - Sreenidi Deccan · 1.83 goals / match - Aizawl
Sreenidi Deccan is 199% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.67 goals / match - Sreenidi Deccan · 2 goals / match - Aizawl
Sreenidi Deccan scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Aizawl keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 matches).
Aizawl scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Sreenidi Deccan keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sreenidi Deccan
Over / Under - Aizawl
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sreenidi Deccan is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.17 pts / match - Sreenidi Deccan · 1 pts / match - Aizawl
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sreenidi Deccan - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Aizawl - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Sreenidi Deccan
Aizawl
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (I-League).
Teams vs league
| Sreenidi Deccan | Liga | Aizawl | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.83 | 2.57 | ▲ 3.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 67% | ▲ 83% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 43% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 20% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 33% | 67% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 83% | 87% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Sreenidi Deccan 2 - 0 - 0 Aizawl. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Sreenidi Deccan vs Aizawl?
The I-League match finished Sreenidi Deccan 1:1 Aizawl. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sreenidi Deccan and Aizawl?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Sreenidi Deccan won 2, Aizawl won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sreenidi Deccan vs Aizawl?
Sreenidi Deccan score 1.17 goals per game on average and Aizawl 1.83. The I-League average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Sreenidi Deccan's matches and 83% of Aizawl's.
What form are Sreenidi Deccan and Aizawl in?
Over the last 5 games Sreenidi Deccan have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Aizawl 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sreenidi Deccan vs Aizawl?
The statistical background for Sreenidi Deccan vs Aizawl — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.