India - I-LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Sreenidi Deccan vs Shillong Lajong: match statistics

Sreenidi Deccan vs Shillong Lajong: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sreenidi Deccan played Shillong Lajong in I-League (India). The match was played on 1 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Sreenidi Deccan: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Shillong Lajong: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sreenidi Deccan scores 1.40 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. Shillong Lajong scores 1.40 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sreenidi Deccan 60%, Shillong Lajong 80%. Over 2.5: Sreenidi Deccan 40%, Shillong Lajong 40%. League level: BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Sreenidi Deccan has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.49. Sreenidi Deccan: 11.2 shots per match, Shillong Lajong: 9.2.

Match halves

Sreenidi Deccan: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.00. Shillong Lajong: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

Sreenidi Deccan: 46-60 (2 goals). Shillong Lajong: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

I-League: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 7.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Sreenidi Deccan are narrow favorites: the hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches (form WLWDW) and average 2.0 points per game over that period, while Shillong Lajong have 2 wins in five matches and average 1.6 points per game. In attack Sreenidi average 15 shots per game and score 2.0 goals with an xG of 1.74, whereas the visitors average 11 shots, score 1.5 goals per game and have an xG of 1.68. Shillong Lajong, however, defend solidly on the road — conceding only 0.5 goals per away match and keeping a clean sheet in 50% of away fixtures, despite an average xG against of 1.83, which suggests they allow quality chances that aren’t converted. Both teams have 7 goals this season and average 5.5 shots on target per game, but Sreenidi’s superiority in total attempts (15 vs 11) and better recent points average (2.0 vs 1.6) indicate greater chance-creation ability. For these reasons I tip a home win, assessing their probability at 52%, a draw at 26% and an away win at 22%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I recommend BTTS - Yes with a 72% probability due to strong signals from both teams: Sreenidi Deccan has a season BTTS of 100% and averages 1.33 goals scored and 1.33 conceded, while Shillong Lajong has BTTS 80% in the last 5 matches and a season scoring average of 1.5 goals per match. xG profiles indicate both teams create chances — xG for 1.37 (Sreenidi) vs 1.68 (Shillong), and xG against 1.83 for Shillong suggests their defense is more vulnerable than the season conceded average of 0.5 goals implies (possible regression). Shillong averages 5.5 shots on target per match vs 2.67 for Sreenidi, increasing the likelihood they will score, while Sreenidi has a higher conversion rate 17% vs 14% and can capitalize on their fewer opportunities. Additionally, the league has a BTTS rate of 68% and an average of 2.56 goals per match, further supporting a both-teams-to-score scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on a combination of the last 5 matches and seasonal xG values, I expect Sreenidi Deccan to score about 1.54 goals and Shillong Lajong about 1.40, yielding a total of ~2.94 goals in the match. Sreenidi has a seasonal xG_for of 1.37 (last 5: 1.52) and averages 1.33 goals, while Shillong has xG_for 1.68 (last 5: 1.49) and averages 1.50 goals; Shillong generates more shots on target (5.5 vs 2.67) and has 50% clean sheets this season versus 0% for Sreenidi. Both teams have had 100% of matches over 1.5 goals this season; Sreenidi has 67% of matches over 2.5 while Shillong has 0%, and in the last 5 matches over 2.5 is 40% for both. With λ=2.94 the Poisson distribution yields roughly a 79% chance of Over 1.5, about 56% for Over 2.5 and around 34% for Over 3.5, therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5 and that is the line I recommend to back.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Shillong Lajong has a clear offensive edge: the visitors’ xG is 1.68 versus the hosts’ 1.37, with average shots 11 (visitors) vs 8 and shots on target 5.5 vs 2.67, indicating more attacking opportunities for the visitors. This is reflected in season results — visitors average 2.0 points per game versus hosts’ 1.33 and have a 50% win rate compared to the hosts’ 33%. Half-Time statistics, however, point to draws: in the hosts’ last 5 matches they were level at the break in 60% of cases, and in the visitors’ last 5 matches the average goals by half-time is 1.4, which raises the likelihood of a draw at the break. After the break the visitors perform better — they were trailing at half-time in 50% of matches, collected 6 points in second halves and average 3.0 points when counting only second halves, while the hosts have no clean sheets at home (0%) and concede on average 1.0 goal by half-time; this favors comebacks and visitor victories. Therefore the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a visitors’ win at full-time (X/2) — I assign this outcome a 28% probability, and the combined chance of a visitors’ win (variants 1/2 + X/2 + 2/2) is about 50%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
3Shots5
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
1Shots on target2
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
0.77xG1.01
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
5Corners10
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
70Dangerous attacks77
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
-1Fouls-1
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
0Cards2
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
1.4Goals scored / match1.4
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
0.8Goals conceded / match1
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
50%Average possession56%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
5.4Shots on target / match3.8
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.2Shots per match9.2
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
5.4Shots on target3.8
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
12.5%Shot conversion15.2%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
50%Possession56%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
1.52xG for1.49
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
1.21xG against1.48
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong

Shooting quality

Sreenidi Deccan: BalancedShillong Lajong: Efficient finishing
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
Accuracy (shots on target)48%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sreenidi Deccan is 25% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Sreenidi Deccan · 1.6 pts / match - Shillong Lajong

Sreenidi Deccan
WLWDW
Season result split
60% W20% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 at home
1-1-0
DW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Shillong Lajong
DWLDW
Season result split
40% W40% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 away
1-1-0
DW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sreenidi Deccan is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.8 goals / match - Sreenidi Deccan · 1 goals / match - Shillong Lajong

Sreenidi Deccan scoring profile: very strong

Sreenidi Deccan scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Shillong Lajong keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

Shillong Lajong scoring profile: very strong

Shillong Lajong scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Sreenidi Deccan keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

7Goals scored (season)7
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
4Goals conceded (season)5
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
2.2Average goals in match2.4
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
7Goals scored (last 5)7
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
20%2 goals40%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
20%3 goals0%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
0%4 goals0%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal80%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
20%2 goals20%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
0%3 goals0%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
0%4 goals0%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

67%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time20%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
20%Scored in both halves40%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
60%BTTS - last 580%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

40%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shillong Lajong is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / match - Sreenidi Deccan · 1.4 pts / match - Shillong Lajong

Sreenidi Deccan - half-time state
20% leading60% draw20% trailing
Shillong Lajong - half-time state
40% leading20% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per match (1st half)1.4
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.6
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
0.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
0.6Average goals (1st half)1.4
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
80%Clean sheet before half-time40%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
80%No goal before half-time40%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)2.4
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.2
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
60%Clean sheet after half-time80%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong
0%No goal after half-time20%
Sreenidi DeccanShillong Lajong

Sreenidi Deccan - second-half results

60% W20% R20% P
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shillong Lajong - second-half results

80% W0% R20% P
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.6

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sreenidi Deccan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.00
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%0%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Shillong Lajong - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.40
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sreenidi Deccan
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Shillong Lajong
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
3
16-30
2
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.30
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+204%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sreenidi Deccan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Shillong Lajong

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (I-League).

Teams vs league

Sreenidi DeccanLigaShillong Lajong
Average goals in match 2.202.67 2.40
Both teams scored 60%67% 80%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%44% 40%
Clean sheets 40%19% 20%
Goal before half-time 40%70% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%93% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
67%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.48
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+24%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
93%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Shillong LajongYellow cardDamaitphang Lyngdoh
  2. Shillong LajongYellow cardRudra Ved
  3. Sreenidi DeccanSubstitutionOn: Abhas ThapaOff: Biaktea Lalbiakhlua
  4. Shillong LajongSubstitutionOn: Jakob VanlalhlimpuiaOff: Everbrightson Sana Mylliempdah

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Sreenidi Deccan 0 - 1 - 1 Shillong Lajong. Average goals 7.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Shillong Lajong FC
4 : 0
Sreenidi Deccan FC
Sreenidi Deccan FC
5 : 5
Shillong Lajong FC

FAQ

What was the result of Sreenidi Deccan vs Shillong Lajong?

The I-League match finished Sreenidi Deccan 0:0 Shillong Lajong. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Sreenidi Deccan and Shillong Lajong?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Sreenidi Deccan won 0, Shillong Lajong won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 7.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Sreenidi Deccan vs Shillong Lajong?

Sreenidi Deccan score 1.40 goals per game on average and Shillong Lajong 1.40. The I-League average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Sreenidi Deccan's matches and 80% of Shillong Lajong's.

What form are Sreenidi Deccan and Shillong Lajong in?

Over the last 5 games Sreenidi Deccan have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Shillong Lajong 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sreenidi Deccan vs Shillong Lajong?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sreenidi Deccan vs Shillong Lajong: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.