United States - MLSData current as of 08 September 2026

St. Louis City vs Los Angeles FC: match statistics

St. Louis City vs Los Angeles FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

St. Louis City played Los Angeles FC in MLS (United States). The match was played on 14 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

St. Louis City: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Los Angeles FC: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

St. Louis City scores 0.91 and concedes 1.64 goals per match. Los Angeles FC scores 1.67 and concedes 1.00. League average: 3.27 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: St. Louis City 55%, Los Angeles FC 33%. Over 2.5: St. Louis City 27%, Los Angeles FC 50%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

St. Louis City has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.50. St. Louis City: 13.7 shots per match, Los Angeles FC: 13.3.

Match halves

St. Louis City: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.64. Los Angeles FC: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

St. Louis City: 46-60 (3 goals). Los Angeles FC: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.27 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The favorite is Los Angeles FC: they have 6 wins this season versus St. Louis’s 2 and a superior goal record of 20–12 compared to 10–18. LAFC’s away defense looks solid — 0.8 goals conceded per game on average and 60% clean sheets, while St. Louis concedes 1.5 goals at home and has 0% clean sheets, giving the visitors a clear defensive edge. However, the hosts create more chances: St. Louis’s home xG is 1.97 with 16.5 shots and 6.75 shots on target per game, whereas LAFC away has 1.43 xG and 4.4 shots on target, so St. Louis has realistic scoring potential. In the last 5 matches both teams scored 6 goals each, with St. Louis conceding 10 and LAFC 11, suggesting a risk of an open game with goals from both sides. Considering LAFC’s better overall record (6 wins vs 2), their defensive advantage on the road and the hosts’ chance creation, I predict an away win (50%); home 30%, draw 20%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I pick BTTS - Yes because in the last 5 matches both teams produced BTTS in 60% of cases, and over that period they conceded on average 2.0 (St. Louis) and 2.2 (LAFC) goals, which increases the likelihood of both scoring. Both sides scored 6 goals in their last 5 matches (avg 1.2 per game) and generate xG 1.45 (St. Louis) vs 1.23 (LAFC), while xG against is 1.42 and 1.83 respectively, meaning both teams create and concede chances. Seasonal signals are mixed: seasonal BTTS is 29% for St. Louis and 40% for LAFC with very high clean sheet percentages of 71% and 60%, which argues against BTTS. However, seasonal xG for 1.55 vs 1.43, shots per game 13.71 vs 12.8 and shots on target 4.71 vs 4.4 show both teams can create opportunities, and the league has 59% BTTS and an average 3.21 goals per game, so overall I favor the "yes" outcome (60% vs 40%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Forecast based on xG: home attack xG = 1.55, away attack xG = 1.43; xG conceded are 1.43 for St. Louis and 1.44 for LAFC, which averaged gives expected goals 1.50 for St. Louis and 1.43 for LAFC, total 2.93 goals. A Poisson distribution with mean 2.93 yields P(0)=5.3% and P(1)=15.6%, so Under 1.5 ≈21% and Over 1.5 ≈79%. Further calculations show P(2)=22.9% (hence Under 2.5 ≈44% / Over 2.5 ≈56%) and P(3)=22.4% (hence Under 3.5 ≈66% / Over 3.5 ≈34%). Seasonal indicators support this picture: St. Louis records Over 1.5 in 71% and Over 2.5 in 57% of matches, LAFC has Over 1.5 in 60% and Over 2.5 in 40% of matches, which reinforces the signal toward the lower Over lines. Additionally, St. Louis averages 13.71 shots with a 15% conversion vs LAFC 12.8 shots and 9% conversion, increasing the likelihood of more goals from the home side.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

At half-time the most likely outcome is a draw: St. Louis were level at the break in 57% of matches and average 1.0 goal by half-time, while LAFC only average 0.2 goals by half-time, and the home side lead at the break in 29% of cases. After the break the data favor St. Louis — the hosts win 57% of matches this season, have a higher xG (1.55 vs 1.43 for the visitors) and better shot conversion (15% vs 9%), and in 56% of second halves they are dominant and average 1.86 goals in the second half. Additionally St. Louis keep 86% clean sheets at half-time and have a low BTTS rate (29%), which increases the likelihood of a low-scoring, even first act that can be broken after the break by the home team. For these reasons the strongest signal from the data is a half-time draw and a home win at full-time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

38Possession (%)62
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
8Shots16
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
2Shots on target4
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
0.79xG1.94
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
2Corners8
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
19Dangerous attacks90
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
13Fouls10
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
3Cards3
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
0.91Goals scored / match1.67
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
1.64Goals conceded / match1
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
50%Average possession47%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
4.45Shots on target / match4.58
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.73Shots per match13.33
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
4.45Shots on target4.58
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
6.6%Shot conversion12.5%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
50%Possession47%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
1.55xG for1.5
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
1.31xG against1.44
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC

Shooting quality

St. Louis City: BalancedLos Angeles FC: Counter-attacking
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
Accuracy (shots on target)32%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.200.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Los Angeles FC is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - St. Louis City · 1 pts / match - Los Angeles FC

St. Louis City
DLLLW
Season result split
18% W27% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-6
0.82 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-2
Last 5 at home
1-1-2
DLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Los Angeles FC
LDWDL
Season result split
50% W25% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-3
1.75 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WDLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Los Angeles FC is 84% better for: goals scored per match.

0.91 goals / match - St. Louis City · 1.67 goals / match - Los Angeles FC

Los Angeles FC is 64% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.64 goals / match - St. Louis City · 1 goals / match - Los Angeles FC

St. Louis City scoring profile: more difficult

St. Louis City scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while Los Angeles FC keeps a clean sheet in 67% (8 of 12 matches).

Los Angeles FC scoring profile: very strong

Los Angeles FC scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while St. Louis City keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 matches).

10Goals scored (season)20
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
18Goals conceded (season)12
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
2.55Average goals in match2.67
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
5Goals scored (last 5)5
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
10Goals conceded (last 5)10
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal83%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
18%2 goals42%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
9%3 goals17%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
0%4 goals8%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC

How often they concede at least...

91%1 goal33%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
45%2 goals33%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
18%3 goals17%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
9%4 goals17%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time8%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
0%BTTS in both halves0%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
9%Scored in both halves17%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
60%BTTS - last 560%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

45%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
64%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Los Angeles FC is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.09 pts / match - St. Louis City · 1.25 pts / match - Los Angeles FC

St. Louis City - half-time state
18% leading55% draw27% trailing
Los Angeles FC - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.09Points per match (1st half)1.25
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
0.27Goals scored (1st half)0.67
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
0.73Average goals (1st half)1
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
64%Clean sheet before half-time75%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
82%No goal before half-time67%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC

After half-time (2nd half)

0.73Points per match (2nd half)1.83
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)1
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
1.18Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
1.82Average goals (2nd half)1.67
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
18%Clean sheet after half-time67%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC
45%No goal after half-time33%
St. Louis CityLos Angeles FC

St. Louis City - second-half results

9% W45% R45% P
12
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Los Angeles FC - second-half results

50% W33% R17% P
15
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

St. Louis City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match0.82.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Los Angeles FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

St. Louis City
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
3
5
46-60
1
4
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Los Angeles FC
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
3
1
16-30
3
2
31-45
3
5
46-60
4
1
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.61
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
80%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

St. Louis City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.97
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.64
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
47%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
121%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

Los Angeles FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.61
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
52%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.75
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

St. Louis CityLigaLos Angeles FC
Average goals in match 2.553.27 2.67
Both teams scored 55%60% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 27%62% 50%
Clean sheets 9%23% 67%
Goal before half-time 45%75% 50%
Goal after half-time 91%80% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.27
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.92
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+42%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. St. Louis CityGoalTomas TotlandAssist: Eduard Löwen
  2. St. Louis CitySubstitutionOn: Rafael Lucas Cardoso dos SantosOff: Jaziel Orozco
  3. St. Louis CitySubstitutionOn: Simon BecherOff: Sang-Bin Jeong
  4. St. Louis CityYellow cardTomas Totland
  5. Los Angeles FCYellow cardEddie Livington Segura Martínez
  6. St. Louis CityYellow cardDante Polvara
  7. St. Louis CitySubstitutionOn: Falu FolOff: Eduard Löwen
  8. Los Angeles FCYellow cardAaron Ray Long
  9. Los Angeles FCSubstitutionOn: David Enmanuel Martínez MoralesOff: Tyler Dominic Boyd
  10. St. Louis CityYellow cardSimon Becher
  11. Los Angeles FCYellow cardRyan Raposo
  12. Los Angeles FCSubstitutionOn: Ryan HollingsheadOff: Ryan Raposo
  13. St. Louis CitySubstitutionOn: Brendan McSorleyOff: Sergio Duvan Córdova Lezama

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Lorenzo HernandezMatches officiated: 8
4.13Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 250%Home wins38%Draws13%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: St. Louis City 0 - 0 - 1 Los Angeles FC. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of St. Louis City vs Los Angeles FC?

The MLS match finished St. Louis City 2:1 Los Angeles FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before St. Louis City vs Los Angeles FC?

St. Louis City score 0.91 goals per game on average and Los Angeles FC 1.67. The MLS average is 3.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 55% of St. Louis City's matches and 33% of Los Angeles FC's.

What form are St. Louis City and Los Angeles FC in?

Over the last 5 games St. Louis City have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Los Angeles FC 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for St. Louis City vs Los Angeles FC?

The statistical background for St. Louis City vs Los Angeles FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.