St. Pölten vs WSPG Wels: match statistics
St. Pölten vs WSPG Wels: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
St. Pölten played WSPG Wels in 2. Liga (Austria). The match was played on 14 May 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
St. Pölten: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. WSPG Wels: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
St. Pölten scores 1.64 and concedes 0.96 goals per match. WSPG Wels scores 1.39 and concedes 1.43. League average: 2.68 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: St. Pölten 50%, WSPG Wels 54%. Over 2.5: St. Pölten 61%, WSPG Wels 43%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
St. Pölten has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.30. St. Pölten: 13.1 shots per match, WSPG Wels: 10.3.
Match halves
St. Pölten: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.00. WSPG Wels: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.71.
Goals by minute
St. Pölten: 76-90+ (11 goals). WSPG Wels: 46-60 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. Liga: 2.68 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
St. Pölten sit 1st and have won 16 matches this season; at home they have a 71% win rate, scoring 1.93 goals and conceding only 0.79 goals per match. WSPG Wels are 11th; away they concede 1.86 goals on average, keep only 7% clean sheets and have failed to score in 36% of away fixtures, indicating defensive vulnerabilities on the road. The hosts generate clearly more high-quality chances: average xG at home is 1.56 versus visitors’ 1.34 xG away, and average shots on target are 5.29 vs 4.14 (average attempts 12.57 vs 10.86). At the same time Wels are in better short-term form (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss in the last 5) and have scored 10 goals in that period, while St. Pölten have just 1 win, 3 draws, 1 loss and 3 goals in their last 5. Considering the hosts’ defensive advantage (0.79 vs 1.86 conceded), superiority in possession (59% vs 49%) and greater number of shots on target, I favour St. Pölten with a 65% chance, draw 20%, and Wels victory estimated at 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS rates are 50% for St. Pölten and 57% for WSPG Wels, with a league average of 50%, placing both teams near neutral but with a slight edge to the visitors. WSPG Wels average 2.0 goals in the last 5 matches and have 60% BTTS in that period; their season stats are 1.71 goals scored and 1.86 conceded with only 7% clean sheets, indicating they frequently take part in Goal/Goal matches. St. Pölten have 0% BTTS in the last 5 matches and average 0.6 scored and 0.6 conceded, although season figures are 1.07 scored and 1.0 conceded with 29% clean sheets, so recent form has limited goal output. xG and shot metrics are similar (home attack xG 1.25 vs away 1.34, defensive xG 1.38 vs 1.44, shots on target 4.0 vs 4.14), and the visitors show higher efficiency (conversion 16% vs 11%), which further supports at least one goal from both sides. Considering Wels' strong scoring form and poor clean sheet stats versus St. Pölten's recent defensive results, I assess BTTS at 60% for 'Yes' and 40% for 'No', backing 'Yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model predicts St. Pölten will score about 1.35 goals and WSPG Wels about 1.36 goals, totaling ~2.71 goals, which places the match moderately above the 2.5 line. Support for an Over 1.5 bet comes from seasonal rates: St. Pölten had 64% of matches with over 1.5 goals, WSPG Wels 71%, and 93% and 100% of their matches ended with at least one goal. From a chance-quality perspective, xG is 1.25 for the home side and 1.34 for the visitors, while opponents concede on average 1.44 and 1.38 xG; averaging these yields forecasts of ~1.35 and 1.36 goals per team, and shots on target of 4.0 vs 4.14 with conversion rates of 11% vs 16%. Seasonally, Over 2.5 occurs in 29% of the home team’s matches and 57% of the away team’s matches (average ~43%), so Over 2.5 is less certain (~55–56%), and Over 3.5 looks unlikely (seasonal 14% and 50%, xG below 3.5). Given the combination of high Over 1.5 percentages (64% and 71%), xG backing, and WSPG Wels’ offensive form (10 goals in 5 matches, 2.0 average), I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
St. Pölten led at the break in 5 of 14 home matches (36%), and hosts average 1.36 points at Half-Time versus 0.79 for visitors, giving them an advantage at the break. The home side score on average 0.71 goals by Half-Time, while opponents concede 0.93 goals in the first half, and across the season visitors concede 1.86 goals per match, which favors St. Pölten taking a lead. There is a risk of a turnaround because the visitors are active after the break — their matches average 2.0 goals in the second half, they themselves score 1.07 goals on average after Half-Time, and in 93% of their games the second half contained at least one goal. Although the visitors have won 3 of their last 5 matches (60%), as away teams they have lost 64% of matches this season, so the hosts’ advantage and their Half-Time stability increase the likelihood of maintaining the lead.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| St. Pölten | WSPG Wels | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
WSPG Wels is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - St. Pölten · 2 pts / match - WSPG Wels
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
St. Pölten is 18% better for: goals scored per match.
1.64 goals / match - St. Pölten · 1.39 goals / match - WSPG Wels
St. Pölten is 49% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.96 goals / match - St. Pölten · 1.43 goals / match - WSPG Wels
St. Pölten scores in 79% of matches (22 of 28 matches), while WSPG Wels keeps a clean sheet in 18% (5 of 28 matches).
WSPG Wels scores in 68% of matches (19 of 28 matches), while St. Pölten keeps a clean sheet in 43% (12 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - St. Pölten
Over / Under - WSPG Wels
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
St. Pölten is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.32 pts / match - St. Pölten · 1.07 pts / match - WSPG Wels
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
St. Pölten - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
WSPG Wels - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
St. Pölten
WSPG Wels
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. Liga).
Teams vs league
| St. Pölten | Liga | WSPG Wels | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.61 | 2.68 | ▲ 2.82 |
| Both teams scored | • 50% | 50% | ▲ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 61% | 50% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 29% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 61% | 71% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | • 75% | 74% | • 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: St. Pölten 0 - 1 - 0 WSPG Wels. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of St. Pölten vs WSPG Wels?
The 2. Liga match finished St. Pölten 1:0 WSPG Wels. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before St. Pölten vs WSPG Wels?
St. Pölten score 1.64 goals per game on average and WSPG Wels 1.39. The 2. Liga average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 50% of St. Pölten's matches and 54% of WSPG Wels's.
What form are St. Pölten and WSPG Wels in?
Over the last 5 games St. Pölten have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and WSPG Wels 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for St. Pölten vs WSPG Wels?
The statistical background for St. Pölten vs WSPG Wels — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


