Norway - First DivisionNadderud StadionData current as of 17 October 2026

Stabæk vs Moss: match statistics

Stabæk crest
Stabæk
2 : 3half-time 2:2
Moss crest
Moss

Stabæk vs Moss: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Stabæk played Moss in First Division (Norway). The match was played on 5 September 2026. Venue: Nadderud Stadion. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

Stabæk: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Moss: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Stabæk scores 2.65 and concedes 1.15 goals per match. Moss scores 1.60 and concedes 2.25. League average: 3.86 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Stabæk 55%, Moss 85%. Over 2.5: Stabæk 75%, Moss 90%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 73%.

xG, shots and style

Stabæk has higher xG: 2.00 vs 1.64. Stabæk: 17.1 shots per match, Moss: 13.6.

Match halves

Stabæk: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.55. Moss: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Stabæk: 46-60 (12 goals). Moss: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division: 3.86 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 73%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-1. Average goals 5.33, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Stabæk are clear favourites: they sit 3rd, while Moss are 14th, and the hosts have won 13 of their 20 league matches, suffering just 4 defeats. At home, Stabæk win 89% of their matches, score an average of 3.22 goals and have failed to score in none of their games, whereas Moss lose 70% of their away fixtures and concede as many as 2.50 goals per match. The hosts’ advantage is also evident in chance creation: they average 16.89 shots and an xG of 1.99, compared with 13.5 shots and an xG of 1.64 for the visitors. Stabæk have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 15 goals in that run, while Moss have managed just 1 win and 5 points over the same period. The visitors are capable of creating danger, but their lack of clean sheets away from home and high goals-conceded rate should ultimately decide the match in favour of the hosts.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes looks very strong, as the percentage of matches in which both teams scored stands at 90% for Stabæk and 80% for Moss, well above the league average of 63%. Stabæk have failed to keep a clean sheet in 90% of their matches, while Moss have not kept a single clean sheet, strongly supporting a goal for both sides. Both attacks create a similar number of chances, with average xG of 1.63 for the hosts and 1.64 for the visitors, alongside high average goals conceded: 2.0 and 2.5, respectively. In their last five matches, Stabæk averaged 3.0 goals scored and Moss 2.0, while BTTS occurred in 60% and 80% of those games, respectively. Further confirmation of their attacking profile comes from the fact that 80% of matches involving both teams featured at least three goals and goals from both sides.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

This is shaping up to be a high-scoring game: Stabæk score an average of 1.6 goals, while Moss concede as many as 2.5 goals per match. In their last five matches, the hosts scored 3.0 goals per game and recorded an xG of 2.11, while Moss scored 2.0 goals per match. Both teams regularly feature in open games, with over 1.5 goals recorded in 90% of Stabæk’s matches and in all of Moss’s matches, while over 2.5 goals occurred in 80% and 100% of cases, respectively. Their weak defenses provide an additional argument: Stabæk keep a clean sheet in only 10% of matches, while Moss do so in 0%, with average xG against figures of 1.65 and 1.72. The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as it requires just two goals to land, while the data from both teams and the league average of 3.87 goals clearly support this scenario.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time followed by a Stabæk win is the most likely outcome, as the hosts were level after 45 minutes in 60% of their last five matches, compared with 40% for Moss. Across the season, Moss were trailing at half-time in 60% of their matches, while Stabæk earned twice as many points per game before the break: 1.2 versus 0.6. After the interval, the hosts have been particularly strong in their current form: they average 2.2 goals scored and concede just 0.6 goals per second half, while Moss record 1.6 and 0.8 respectively. Stabæk have won four of their last five matches, scoring an average of 3.0 goals in those games, whereas Moss have won only once, further supporting the scenario of the hosts taking control after the break. Both teams have a similar attacking potential according to xG—1.63 for Stabæk and 1.64 for Moss—so the hosts’ advantage should become more apparent only in the second half.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 2
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

74Possession (%)26
StabækMoss
18Shots11
StabækMoss
9Shots on target3
StabækMoss
2.49xG1.22
StabækMoss
8Corners4
StabækMoss
101Dangerous attacks43
StabækMoss
10Fouls10
StabækMoss
0Cards1
StabækMoss

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.65Goals scored / match1.6
StabækMoss
1.15Goals conceded / match2.25
StabækMoss
56%Average possession50%
StabækMoss
6.15Shots on target / match5.2
StabækMoss

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

17.05Shots per match13.55
StabækMoss
6.15Shots on target5.2
StabækMoss
15.5%Shot conversion11.8%
StabækMoss
56%Possession50%
StabækMoss
2xG for1.64
StabækMoss
1.36xG against1.68
StabækMoss

Shooting quality

Stabæk: DominantMoss: Balanced
StabækMoss
Accuracy (shots on target)36%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Stabæk is 500% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Stabæk · 0.4 pts / match - Moss

Stabæk
WWWWL
Season result split
65% W15% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-3-4
2.10 pts / match · goal difference +30
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-0-1
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 2.15Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Moss
LDLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
25% W20% D55% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-11
0.95 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-0-7
Last 5 away
1-0-4
WLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Stabæk is 66% better for: goals scored per match.

2.65 goals / match - Stabæk · 1.6 goals / match - Moss

Stabæk is 96% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.15 goals / match - Stabæk · 2.25 goals / match - Moss

Stabæk scoring profile: very strong

Stabæk scores in 95% of matches (19 of 20 matches), while Moss keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 20 matches).

Moss scoring profile: very strong

Moss scores in 90% of matches (18 of 20 matches), while Stabæk keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 matches).

53Goals scored (season)32
StabækMoss
23Goals conceded (season)45
StabækMoss
3.8Average goals in match3.85
StabækMoss
15Goals scored (last 5)8
StabækMoss
7Goals conceded (last 5)11
StabækMoss

How often they score at least...

95%1 goal90%
StabækMoss
75%2 goals45%
StabækMoss
45%3 goals20%
StabækMoss
35%4 goals5%
StabækMoss

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal95%
StabækMoss
50%2 goals85%
StabækMoss
5%3 goals35%
StabækMoss
0%4 goals10%
StabækMoss

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time35%
StabækMoss
10%BTTS in both halves10%
StabækMoss
55%Scored in both halves20%
StabækMoss

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS80%
StabækMoss
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
StabækMoss
60%BTTS - last 5100%
StabækMoss

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
StabækMoss
55%Min. 2 goals before half-time60%
StabækMoss
35%Min. 3 goals before half-time30%
StabækMoss

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
StabækMoss
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
StabækMoss
45%Min. 3 goals after half-time35%
StabækMoss

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Stabæk is 72% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.55 pts / match - Stabæk · 0.9 pts / match - Moss

Stabæk - half-time state
40% leading35% draw25% trailing
Moss - half-time state
20% leading30% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.55Points per match (1st half)0.9
StabækMoss
1.1Goals scored (1st half)0.6
StabækMoss
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)1.2
StabækMoss
1.7Average goals (1st half)1.8
StabækMoss
65%Clean sheet before half-time30%
StabækMoss
35%No goal before half-time55%
StabækMoss

After half-time (2nd half)

2.35Points per match (2nd half)1.25
StabækMoss
1.55Goals scored (2nd half)1
StabækMoss
0.55Goals conceded (2nd half)1.05
StabækMoss
2.1Average goals (2nd half)2.05
StabækMoss
60%Clean sheet after half-time30%
StabækMoss
15%No goal after half-time35%
StabækMoss

Stabæk - second-half results

75% W10% D15% L
31
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+20
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding163%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Moss - second-half results

35% W20% D45% L
18
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding125%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Stabæk - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.40
Goals scored / match0.82.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.62.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference0+8
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Moss - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.60
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match1.40.8
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-5+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Stabæk
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
10
6
16-30
7
2
31-45
12
3
46-60
7
5
61-75
12
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Moss
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
4
9
16-30
5
9
31-45
8
6
46-60
5
7
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.5 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+39%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
86%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Stabæk

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.64
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.86
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.65
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Moss

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.61
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.57
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

StabækLigaMoss
Average goals in match• 3.803.86• 3.85
Both teams scored▼ 55%63%▲ 85%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 75%73%▲ 90%
Clean sheets▲ 40%19%▼ 5%
Goal before half-time▼ 75%77%▲ 80%
Goal after half-time• 90%89%• 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.86
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
2.16
Home goals / match
1.70
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
9%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
38%
3 goals
19%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MossGoalOscar Aga
  2. StabækGoalJacob HanstadAssist: Nicolai Næss
  3. MossSubstitutionOn: Noah IbsenOff: Kristian Strande
  4. StabækSubstitutionOn: Axel Ostvold AamodtOff: Gottfrid Rapp
  5. MossYellow cardJamiu Musbaudeen
  6. MossSubstitutionOn: Noah AlexanderssonOff: Momodou Lion Njie
  7. StabækSubstitutionOn: Eirik LerengOff: Karsten Arman Ekorness

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Stabæk 0 - 2 - 1 Moss. Average goals 5.33, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Moss
2 : 2
Stabæk
Stabæk Fotball
3 : 3
Moss FK
Moss FK
4 : 2
Stabæk Fotball

FAQ

What was the result of Stabæk vs Moss?

The First Division match finished Stabæk 2:3 Moss. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Stabæk and Moss?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Stabæk won 0, Moss won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 5.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Stabæk vs Moss?

Stabæk score 2.65 goals per game on average and Moss 1.60. The First Division average is 3.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Stabæk's matches and 85% of Moss's.

What form are Stabæk and Moss in?

Over the last 5 games Stabæk have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Moss 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Stabæk vs Moss?

The statistical background for Stabæk vs Moss — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.