Stal Kraśnik vs Siarka Tarnobrzeg: match statistics
Stal Kraśnik vs Siarka Tarnobrzeg: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Stal Kraśnik played Siarka Tarnobrzeg in 3 Liga Group 4 (Poland). The match was played on 13 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Stal Kraśnik: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Siarka Tarnobrzeg: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Stal Kraśnik scores 1.21 and concedes 1.62 goals per match. Siarka Tarnobrzeg scores 1.70 and concedes 1.33. League average: 3.10 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Stal Kraśnik 55%, Siarka Tarnobrzeg 60%. Over 2.5: Stal Kraśnik 52%, Siarka Tarnobrzeg 63%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 59%.
xG, shots and style
Stal Kraśnik has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.33. Stal Kraśnik: 5.3 shots per match, Siarka Tarnobrzeg: 4.9.
Match halves
Stal Kraśnik: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.62. Siarka Tarnobrzeg: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.53.
Goals by minute
Stal Kraśnik: 0-15 (8 goals). Siarka Tarnobrzeg: 0-15 (17 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
3 Liga Group 4: 3.10 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 59%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Stal Kraśnik holds the edge in recent form and chance creation: 2 wins in the last 5 matches and an average of 1.4 points per game, with 6 goals scored versus Siarka’s 4 in the same period. At home Stal produces on average 10.4 shots, 3.8 on target and xG 1.24, while Siarka away records 8.86 shots, 3.29 on target and xG 1.15, indicating more opportunities for the hosts. Conversely, Siarka has a superior season-long offensive record (51 goals vs 35 for Stal) and higher shot conversion on the road (13% vs 10%), plus fewer defeats this season (10 vs 17), so they can finish chances. Stal’s defense is vulnerable — hosts concede 1.67 goals at home on average and have 0% clean sheets, while Siarka concede 1.4 away with 20% clean sheets, pointing to an open, high-scoring game. Considering Stal’s better recent form and greater chance volume but Siarka’s season advantages, I predict a narrow home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 60% each, versus a league average of 57%, which inherently raises the likelihood of both teams scoring. Stal Kraśnik averages 2.0 goals scored and concedes 1.27 per match, while Siarka scores 1.4 and concedes 1.4 — both sides therefore create and allow goals. Clean sheets are rare: 27% for the home side and 20% for the away side, and in the last 5 matches both teams register BTTS at 60%; over that period Stal scored 6 and conceded 5, Siarka scored 4 and conceded 6. xG and shot stats support this — Stal posts 1.47 xG and 5.33 shots on target per game, Siarka 1.15 xG and 3.29 on-target, with Stal’s conversion rate at 19% versus Siarka’s 13%, suggesting both teams can turn chances into goals. Considering the 60% BTTS rates for both teams, low clean sheet percentages, comparable xG and recent form, I predict BTTS - Yes with a probability of 72% versus 28% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG I expect a total of around 2.82 goals: Stal Kraśnik about 1.45 goals (Stal avg xG 1.47 and Siarka avg xG conceded 1.43 → (1.47+1.43)/2=1.45), and Siarka about 1.37 goals (Siarka avg xG 1.15 and Stal avg xG conceded 1.58 → (1.15+1.58)/2=1.37). A Poisson model with λ=2.82 gives probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) of about 77%, which correlates with seasonal Over1.5 rates: Stal 87% and Siarka 80%. For the 2.5 line the model forecasts Over ≈53% (seasonally Stal 67%, Siarka 60%), and for 3.5 Over ≈31% (seasonally Stal 53%, Siarka 33%), so the edge diminishes at higher lines. Additionally both teams had matches with both teams scoring in 60% of fixtures; Stal averages 5.33 shots on target with 19% conversion, and Siarka 3.29 shots on target with 13% conversion — this increases the chance of at least two goals and supports the Over 1.5 selection.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Stal Kraśnik possesses a clear offensive edge and better form: seasonally they score an average of 2.0 goals per match versus 1.4 for Siarka, have higher xG (1.47 vs 1.15) and more shots on target (5.33 vs 3.29), which indicates greater likelihood of taking the lead at the break. At half-time Stal averages 1.0 goals scored and concedes only 0.27, while Siarka records 0.79 scored and 0.5 conceded in the first 45 minutes; Stal have been leading at half-time in 36% of their matches. Siarka’s form is unimpressive — over the last 5 matches they have no wins (0% win rate) and average 0.6 points in that period, so their chances of executing a turnaround after the break are lower. At the same time both teams have a high share of matches with both teams scoring (60% each), and the probability of at least one goal in the second half is 91% for Stal and 86% for Siarka, so the visitors can score after the break but rarely fully reverse the result. Therefore the most reliable scenario is Stal leading at half-time and winning the match (1/1) — I assign it a 24% probability, with alternatives X/1 at 20% and X/X at 16%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Stal Kraśnik | Siarka Tarnobrzeg | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 25% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.27 | 0.27 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.92 | 0.89 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Stal Kraśnik is 133% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Stal Kraśnik · 0.6 pts / match - Siarka Tarnobrzeg
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Siarka Tarnobrzeg is 40% better for: goals scored per match.
1.21 goals / match - Stal Kraśnik · 1.7 goals / match - Siarka Tarnobrzeg
Siarka Tarnobrzeg is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.62 goals / match - Stal Kraśnik · 1.33 goals / match - Siarka Tarnobrzeg
Stal Kraśnik scores in 59% of matches (17 of 29 matches), while Siarka Tarnobrzeg keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 matches).
Siarka Tarnobrzeg scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while Stal Kraśnik keeps a clean sheet in 3% (1 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Stal Kraśnik
Over / Under - Siarka Tarnobrzeg
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Siarka Tarnobrzeg is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.17 pts / match - Stal Kraśnik · 1.37 pts / match - Siarka Tarnobrzeg
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Stal Kraśnik - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Siarka Tarnobrzeg - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (17 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Stal Kraśnik
Siarka Tarnobrzeg
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 4).
Teams vs league
| Stal Kraśnik | Liga | Siarka Tarnobrzeg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.83 | 3.10 | • 3.03 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 55% | 58% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 52% | 59% | ▲ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 3% | 24% | • 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 62% | 54% | ▲ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 69% | 58% | ▲ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Siarka TarnobrzegGoalKacper Marszalik
- Stal KraśnikGoalSacha Martinez
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Stal Kraśnik 0 - 0 - 1 Siarka Tarnobrzeg. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Stal Kraśnik vs Siarka Tarnobrzeg?
The 3 Liga Group 4 match finished Stal Kraśnik 1:1 Siarka Tarnobrzeg. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Stal Kraśnik vs Siarka Tarnobrzeg?
Stal Kraśnik score 1.21 goals per game on average and Siarka Tarnobrzeg 1.70. The 3 Liga Group 4 average is 3.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Stal Kraśnik's matches and 60% of Siarka Tarnobrzeg's.
What form are Stal Kraśnik and Siarka Tarnobrzeg in?
Over the last 5 games Stal Kraśnik have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Siarka Tarnobrzeg 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Stal Kraśnik vs Siarka Tarnobrzeg?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


