Standard Liège vs Royal Antwerp FC: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Standard Liège vs Royal Antwerp FC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Standard Liège play Royal Antwerp FC in Pro League (Belgium). The match date is 5 September 2026. Venue: Stade Maurice Dufrasne.
Current form
Standard Liège: 2-2-0, 2.00 points/match. Royal Antwerp FC: 2-1-1, 1.75 points/match.
Goal statistics
Standard Liège scores 2.25 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Royal Antwerp FC scores 2.50 and concedes 2.25. League average: 3.19 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Standard Liège 75%, Royal Antwerp FC 75%. Over 2.5: Standard Liège 75%, Royal Antwerp FC 100%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 69%.
xG, shots and style
Royal Antwerp FC has higher xG: 2.03 vs 1.48. Standard Liège: 13.0 shots per match, Royal Antwerp FC: 17.0.
Match halves
Standard Liège: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.25. Royal Antwerp FC: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 2.00.
Goals by minute
Standard Liège: 61-75 (4 goals). Royal Antwerp FC: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Pro League: 3.19 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 69%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-1. Average goals 2.75, BTTS 50%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Standard Liège | Royal Antwerp FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.45 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Standard Liège is 14% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Standard Liège · 1.75 pts / match - Royal Antwerp FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Royal Antwerp FC is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
2.25 goals / match - Standard Liège · 2.5 goals / match - Royal Antwerp FC
Standard Liège is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - Standard Liège · 2.25 goals / match - Royal Antwerp FC
Standard Liège scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Royal Antwerp FC keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).
Royal Antwerp FC scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Standard Liège keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Standard Liège
Over / Under - Royal Antwerp FC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Standard Liège is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / match - Standard Liège · 1 pts / match - Royal Antwerp FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Standard Liège - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Royal Antwerp FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.25 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.5 | 2.3 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 25% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 25% |
| No goal | 25% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.75 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| Average goals in match | 1.3 | 3.5 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 25% | 50% |
| No goal | 50% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Standard Liège
Royal Antwerp FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Standard Liège | Liga | Royal Antwerp FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.75 | 3.19 | ▲ 4.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 50% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 75% | 69% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | • 25% | 26% | • 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 75% | 83% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 86% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Standard Liège 2 - 1 - 1 Royal Antwerp FC. Average goals 2.75, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
When do Standard Liège and Royal Antwerp FC play?
Standard Liège face Royal Antwerp FC on 5 September 2026 in Pro League at Stade Maurice Dufrasne. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Standard Liège and Royal Antwerp FC?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Standard Liège won 2, Royal Antwerp FC won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Standard Liège vs Royal Antwerp FC?
Standard Liège score 2.25 goals per game on average and Royal Antwerp FC 2.50. The Pro League average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Standard Liège's matches and 75% of Royal Antwerp FC's.
What form are Standard Liège and Royal Antwerp FC in?
Over the last 5 games Standard Liège have a 2-2-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Royal Antwerp FC 2-1-1 (1.75 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Standard Liège vs Royal Antwerp FC?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.