Poland - 3 Liga Group 2Data current as of 18 September 2026

Stargard Szczeciński vs Victoria Września: match statistics

165%(1.55)
X20%(4.25)
215%(4.40)

Stargard Szczeciński clearly outperforms Victoria Września in both offensive and defensive aspects. The hosts score an average of 1.73 goals per home match with an xG of 1.44, while the visitors net only 0.5 goals per away game with an xG of 1.14. Victoria has a dismal away record with 80% losses and only 20% wins, conceding an average of 1.2 goals with an xG Against of 1.75. Stargard boasts a significantly better conversion rate (16% vs 6%) and possession dominance (68% vs 52%). The hosts' goal difference in home matches is +3, while the visitors have -7 away, further confirming Stargard's superiority. The form of both teams in the last five matches also favors the hosts, who have earned 1.2 points per match compared to the visitors' 0.8.

Stargard Szczeciński vs Victoria Września: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Stargard Szczeciński played Victoria Września in 3 Liga Group 2 (Poland). The match was played on 28 March 2026. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

Stargard Szczeciński: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Victoria Września: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Stargard Szczeciński scores 1.61 and concedes 1.52 goals per match. Victoria Września scores 1.05 and concedes 1.45. League average: 2.94 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Stargard Szczeciński 57%, Victoria Września 45%. Over 2.5: Stargard Szczeciński 61%, Victoria Września 50%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

Stargard Szczeciński has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.18. Stargard Szczeciński: 8.6 shots per match, Victoria Września: 2.8.

Match halves

Stargard Szczeciński: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.87. Victoria Września: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.32.

Goals by minute

Stargard Szczeciński: 76-90+ (13 goals). Victoria Września: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3 Liga Group 2: 2.94 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Stargard Szczeciński clearly outperforms Victoria Września in both offensive and defensive aspects. The hosts score an average of 1.73 goals per home match with an xG of 1.44, while the visitors net only 0.5 goals per away game with an xG of 1.14. Victoria has a dismal away record with 80% losses and only 20% wins, conceding an average of 1.2 goals with an xG Against of 1.75. Stargard boasts a significantly better conversion rate (16% vs 6%) and possession dominance (68% vs 52%). The hosts' goal difference in home matches is +3, while the visitors have -7 away, further confirming Stargard's superiority. The form of both teams in the last five matches also favors the hosts, who have earned 1.2 points per match compared to the visitors' 0.8.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Stargard has a very high seasonal BTTS rate (64%) coupled with a weak defense: conceding 1.82 goals per match and a high 2.47 xG against, with a low clean sheet percentage (18%). This significantly increases the likelihood that Victoria will score, despite their low away goal average (0.5) and frequent failure to score (FTS 50%). Simultaneously, Victoria concedes an average of 1.2 goals and has a high xG against (1.75), thus creating favorable conditions for the hosts to score at least one goal (seasonal average 1.36 goals). The last 5 matches provide mixed signals (BTTS: Stargard 20%, Victoria 60%), but both teams averaged 1.0 goal scored per match in that period while conceding 1.6 and 1.4 respectively. Overall, Stargard's defensive profile and the xG statistics for both sides tip the assessment slightly towards 'BTTS - Yes'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Stargard's matches are characterized by high goal volatility: they average 1.36 goals scored and a high 1.82 goals conceded. Their xG against (2.47) indicates they regularly allow opponents very good scoring opportunities. Meanwhile, Victoria has a low average of goals scored (0.50) and a high rate of failing to score (FTS 50%), which caps the potential scoreline and shifts the projected total towards 2-3 goals. From an Over/Under market perspective, the base for at least 2 goals is solid: Over 0.5 stands at 91% (home) and 100% (away), while Stargard also has a 91% rate for Over 1.5. In the last 5 matches, both teams have frequently been involved in Over 2.5 games (80% and 60%), boosting the projection beyond their seasonal averages alone. With a league average of 2.93 goals, the expected total of 2.75 is consistent with the data, but the greatest edge comes from the safer line of Over 1.5. Therefore, the best play is Over 1.5 as the strongest and most probable signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest HT signal is the home team's advantage: Stargard leads at the break in 45% of matches, while Victoria has only an 11% HT lead rate along with a very high percentage of conceding the first goal in the first half (78%) and just 0.22 goals scored per first half. Over the longer term, Victoria loses 80% of matches and does not record draws (0%), which favors outcomes in the opponent's favor. Although xG suggests that the visitors are capable of generating chances (xG for 1.14 vs 0.87), their actual efficiency this season is low (0.5 goals per match), which limits the chances of a turnaround. Stargard has poor defense over the full match (1.82 conceded; xG against 2.47), which is why I give more weight to options involving changes after the break (X/1, 2/2), but maintaining the home advantage (1/1) remains the most probable outcome. Additionally, the home team's trend of scoring in the second half (82% over 0.5 goals) increases the likelihood that, if leading at halftime, they will secure the result thanks to further chances late in the game.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
-1Shots-1
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
-1Shots on target-1
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
0xG0
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
-1Corners-1
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
0Dangerous attacks0
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
-1Fouls-1
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
-1Cards-1
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
1.61Goals scored / match1.05
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
1.52Goals conceded / match1.45
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
43%Average possession20%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
3.39Shots on target / match0.27
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.57Shots per match2.82
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
3.39Shots on target0.27
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
18.8%Shot conversion37.1%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
43%Possession20%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
1.48xG for1.18
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
1.26xG against1.94
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września

Shooting quality

Stargard Szczeciński: Counter-attackingVictoria Września: Counter-attacking
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
Accuracy (shots on target)40%10%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.42
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.473.89

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Stargard Szczeciński is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Stargard Szczeciński · 0.8 pts / match - Victoria Września

Stargard Szczeciński
LWWLL
Season result split
39% W22% D39% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-9
1.39 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 80%
Victoria Września
WDLLL
Season result split
27% W5% D68% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-15
0.86 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-0-8
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.87Opponent xG: 2.47BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Stargard Szczeciński is 53% better for: goals scored per match.

1.61 goals / match - Stargard Szczeciński · 1.05 goals / match - Victoria Września

Victoria Września is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.52 goals / match - Stargard Szczeciński · 1.45 goals / match - Victoria Września

Stargard Szczeciński scoring profile: very strong

Stargard Szczeciński scores in 74% of matches (17 of 23 matches), while Victoria Września keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 matches).

Victoria Września scoring profile: very strong

Victoria Września scores in 64% of matches (14 of 22 matches), while Stargard Szczeciński keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 23 matches).

37Goals scored (season)23
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
35Goals conceded (season)32
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
3.13Average goals in match2.5
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
5Goals scored (last 5)5
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
8Goals conceded (last 5)7
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal64%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
48%2 goals27%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
30%3 goals14%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
9%4 goals0%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal77%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
43%2 goals50%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
22%3 goals18%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
4%4 goals0%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
Stargard Szczeciński - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 23 matches
45%
Victoria Września - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 22 matches
51%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time14%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
26%Scored in both halves5%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
20%BTTS - last 560%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września

1st half

87%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Stargard Szczeciński is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.39 pts / match - Stargard Szczeciński · 1.23 pts / match - Victoria Września

Stargard Szczeciński - half-time state
39% leading22% draw39% trailing
Victoria Września - half-time state
27% leading41% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.39Points per match (1st half)1.23
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
0.74Goals scored (1st half)0.55
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
0.78Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
1.52Average goals (1st half)1.05
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
35%Clean sheet before half-time59%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
48%No goal before half-time64%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września

After half-time (2nd half)

1.43Points per match (2nd half)0.77
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
0.87Goals scored (2nd half)0.32
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
0.74Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
1.61Average goals (2nd half)1.18
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
52%Clean sheet after half-time41%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września
52%No goal after half-time77%
Stargard SzczecińskiVictoria Września

Stargard Szczeciński - second-half results

39% W26% D35% L
32
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Victoria Września - second-half results

14% W36% D50% L
27
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Stargard Szczeciński - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Victoria Września - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Stargard Szczeciński
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
5
7
16-30
6
6
31-45
5
4
46-60
3
4
61-75
13
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Victoria Września
ScoredConceded
7
7
0-15
5
1
16-30
4
5
31-45
2
6
46-60
1
4
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.82
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
51%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+42%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Stargard Szczeciński

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

Victoria Września

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.76
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 2).

Teams vs league

Stargard SzczecińskiLigaVictoria Września
Average goals in match 3.132.94 2.50
Both teams scored 57%51% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 61%57% 50%
Clean sheets 17%28% 23%
Goal before half-time 87%71% 64%
Goal after half-time 78%72% 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.94
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.57
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Stargard Szczeciński 1 - 0 - 0 Victoria Września. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Victoria Września
1 : 3
Stargard Szczeciński

FAQ

What was the result of Stargard Szczeciński vs Victoria Września?

The 3 Liga Group 2 match finished Stargard Szczeciński 2:3 Victoria Września. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Stargard Szczeciński vs Victoria Września?

Stargard Szczeciński score 1.61 goals per game on average and Victoria Września 1.05. The 3 Liga Group 2 average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Stargard Szczeciński's matches and 45% of Victoria Września's.

What form are Stargard Szczeciński and Victoria Września in?

Over the last 5 games Stargard Szczeciński have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Victoria Września 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Stargard Szczeciński vs Victoria Września?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.