Norway - EliteserienSparebanken Sør ArenaData current as of 06 September 2026

Start vs Rosenborg: match statistics

Start crest
Start
0 : 3half-time 0:1
Rosenborg crest
Rosenborg

Start vs Rosenborg: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Start played Rosenborg in Eliteserien (Norway). The match was played on 18 July 2026. Venue: Sparebanken Sør Arena. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

Start: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Rosenborg: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Start scores 1.08 and concedes 2.31 goals per match. Rosenborg scores 1.00 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.98 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Start 77%, Rosenborg 33%. Over 2.5: Start 54%, Rosenborg 42%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Rosenborg has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.28. Start: 11.5 shots per match, Rosenborg: 11.9.

Match halves

Start: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.38. Rosenborg: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

Start: 31-45+ (5 goals). Rosenborg: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eliteserien: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Start has a clear home advantage: at home they average 1.2 goals per match with an average xG of 1.41 and 0% of home matches without scoring (percentage of home matches without a goal = 0%), indicating consistent creation and conversion of at least one chance. Rosenborg are dramatically ineffective away — averaging 0.0 goals scored on the road, percentage of away matches without a goal = 100% and 0% away wins, despite an away xG of 1.12. Defensively Start concedes 1.4 goals per home match on average (xG against 1.47), while Rosenborg concede 1.8 goals away (xG against 1.88), so the visitors are more exposed at the back on the road. Admittedly Rosenborg have better recent form overall (1.4 points per match in the last 5 with 2 wins, 9 goals in that period), while Start have 0.6 points per match and 1 win (8 goals), but Rosenborg’s poor away efficiency (0 goals, 80% away losses) is decisive. Considering Start’s 3.4 shots on target at home with ~9% conversion versus Rosenborg’s 2.8 shots on target away with practically 0% conversion, I forecast a home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Start has a seasonal BTTS rate of 57% and BTTS in the last 5 matches of 80%, while Rosenborg has a seasonal BTTS of 0% but 40% in the last 5 matches. In the last 5 fixtures Start scored 8 and conceded 14 (avg 1.6 scored and 2.8 conceded per game), and Rosenborg scored 9 and conceded 7 (1.8 and 1.4 per game), indicating goals on both sides are likely. Start produces 1.49 xG on average and registers 13.14 shots with 4.14 on target per match; Rosenborg posts 1.12 xG with 10.2 shots and 2.8 on target, so the home side creates more chances while the visitors can still respond. Additionally, the league BTTS is 55% and clean sheet rates are 29% for Start versus 20% for Rosenborg, which also favors a both-teams-to-score scenario; therefore I assess BTTS at 70% vs 30% and recommend the selection "BTTS - Yes".

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model (attack averages vs defense averages) forecasts 1.69 goals for Start ((1.49+1.88)/2 = 1.69) and 1.24 for Rosenborg ((1.12+1.36)/2 = 1.24), yielding a total of 2.93 goals. The 2.93 projection is close to the league average of 2.98 and clearly above the 2.5 threshold, and in the last 5 matches Start had Over 2.5 in 80% of games while Rosenborg had 60%, which strengthens the signal for Over 2.5. The 1.5 line is almost certain — Start has 100% of home matches with Over 1.5, Rosenborg 80%, therefore I rate Over 1.5 very highly (approx. 90%). Over 3.5 looks unlikely: seasonally Start exceeds 3.5 in only 29% of home games, Rosenborg 0%, and the projected 2.93 is materially below the 3.5 threshold, hence Over 3.5 at roughly ~31%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Start averages 1.14 goals by half-time and concedes 0.57, while Rosenborg has 0.0 goals by half-time and concedes 1.2. Statistics show Start led at the break in 2 matches (29%) and was level at half-time in 5 (71%), whereas Rosenborg never led at half-time (0%) and were down at the break in 4 cases (80%), suggesting a high likelihood of a draw or the home side leading after 45 minutes. Over the full match Start averages 1.57 points at home and wins 43% of matches, while Rosenborg averages 0.2 points away and has 0% wins, so the hosts are favorites for the final victory. Start produces 1.49 xG and 13.14 shots (4.14 on target) per game versus Rosenborg’s 1.12 xG and 10.2 shots (2.8 on target), indicating more scoring opportunities after the break. Therefore the most likely scenario is a Half-Time draw and a Start win at full-time (HT/FT X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
StartRosenborg
14Shots9
StartRosenborg
3Shots on target6
StartRosenborg
1.47xG1.34
StartRosenborg
5Corners3
StartRosenborg
52Dangerous attacks48
StartRosenborg
15Fouls15
StartRosenborg
2Cards2
StartRosenborg

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.08Goals scored / match1
StartRosenborg
2.31Goals conceded / match1.5
StartRosenborg
40%Average possession52%
StartRosenborg
3.54Shots on target / match3.58
StartRosenborg

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.46Shots per match11.92
StartRosenborg
3.54Shots on target3.58
StartRosenborg
9.4%Shot conversion8.4%
StartRosenborg
40%Possession52%
StartRosenborg
1.28xG for1.34
StartRosenborg
1.77xG against1.57
StartRosenborg

Shooting quality

Start: BalancedRosenborg: Balanced
StartRosenborg
Accuracy (shots on target)31%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Rosenborg is 133% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Start · 1.4 pts / match - Rosenborg

Start
LLWLL
Season result split
8% W31% R62% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-4-8
0.54 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-3-1
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.96BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Rosenborg
WLLDW
Season result split
25% W25% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-6
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-4
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Start is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

1.08 goals / match - Start · 1 goals / match - Rosenborg

Rosenborg is 54% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.31 goals / match - Start · 1.5 goals / match - Rosenborg

Start scoring profile: very strong

Start scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Rosenborg keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).

Rosenborg scoring profile: strong

Rosenborg scores in 50% of matches (6 of 12 matches), while Start keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 matches).

14Goals scored (season)12
StartRosenborg
30Goals conceded (season)18
StartRosenborg
3.38Average goals in match2.5
StartRosenborg
8Goals scored (last 5)9
StartRosenborg
14Goals conceded (last 5)7
StartRosenborg

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal50%
StartRosenborg
15%2 goals42%
StartRosenborg
8%3 goals8%
StartRosenborg
0%4 goals0%
StartRosenborg

How often they concede at least...

92%1 goal75%
StartRosenborg
62%2 goals58%
StartRosenborg
31%3 goals17%
StartRosenborg
23%4 goals0%
StartRosenborg

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time33%
StartRosenborg
0%BTTS in both halves17%
StartRosenborg
0%Scored in both halves33%
StartRosenborg

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
StartRosenborg
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
StartRosenborg
80%BTTS - last 540%
StartRosenborg

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
StartRosenborg
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
StartRosenborg
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
StartRosenborg

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
StartRosenborg
62%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
StartRosenborg
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
StartRosenborg

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Start is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.23 pts / match - Start · 1 pts / match - Rosenborg

Start - half-time state
31% leading31% draw38% trailing
Rosenborg - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.23Points per match (1st half)1
StartRosenborg
0.69Goals scored (1st half)0.67
StartRosenborg
0.77Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
StartRosenborg
1.46Average goals (1st half)1.5
StartRosenborg
46%Clean sheet before half-time33%
StartRosenborg
54%No goal before half-time50%
StartRosenborg

After half-time (2nd half)

0.69Points per match (2nd half)0.92
StartRosenborg
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
StartRosenborg
1.54Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
StartRosenborg
1.92Average goals (2nd half)1
StartRosenborg
31%Clean sheet after half-time50%
StartRosenborg
62%No goal after half-time67%
StartRosenborg

Start - second-half results

15% W23% R62% P
16
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding26%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 8%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Rosenborg - second-half results

17% W42% R42% P
12
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding147%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Start - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.000.20
Goals scored / match1.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.62.2
Average goals in match2.02.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+4-10
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7
Rosenborg - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match2.01.2
1 goal100%60%
2 goals100%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Start
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
1
4
16-30
5
5
31-45
3
4
46-60
1
8
61-75
1
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Rosenborg
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
2
4
16-30
3
2
31-45
2
4
46-60
1
3
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.95
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Start

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.74
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
59%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
201%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

Rosenborg

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).

Teams vs league

StartLigaRosenborg
Average goals in match 3.382.98 2.50
Both teams scored 77%55% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 54%56% 42%
Clean sheets 8%24% 25%
Goal before half-time 77%82% 83%
Goal after half-time 85%78% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.83
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+59%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defence advantage
+28%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. RosenborgGoalAmin Chiakha
  2. RosenborgSubstitutionOn: Jonas Søgaard MortensenOff: Jonas Svensson
  3. StartYellow cardSteve Regis Mvoue
  4. RosenborgYellow cardSimen Bolkan Nordli
  5. RosenborgYellow cardJesper Reitan- Sunde
  6. StartSubstitutionOn: Deni DashaevOff: Steve Regis Mvoue

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Start vs Rosenborg?

The Eliteserien match finished Start 0:3 Rosenborg. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Start vs Rosenborg?

Start score 1.08 goals per game on average and Rosenborg 1.00. The Eliteserien average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 77% of Start's matches and 33% of Rosenborg's.

What form are Start and Rosenborg in?

Over the last 5 games Start have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Rosenborg 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Start vs Rosenborg?

The statistical background for Start vs Rosenborg — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.