Start vs Vålerenga: match statistics
Start vs Vålerenga: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Start played Vålerenga in Eliteserien (Norway). The match was played on 25 May 2026. Venue: Sparebanken Sør Arena. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Start: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Vålerenga: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Start scores 1.00 and concedes 2.60 goals per match. Vålerenga scores 1.11 and concedes 1.56. League average: 3.00 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Start 80%, Vålerenga 44%. Over 2.5: Start 50%, Vålerenga 33%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Vålerenga has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.26. Start: 10.7 shots per match, Vålerenga: 14.7.
Match halves
Start: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.40. Vålerenga: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.44.
Goals by minute
Start: 31-45+ (4 goals). Vålerenga: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Eliteserien: 3.00 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an away win (Vålerenga). Vålerenga sit 10th in the table while Start are 16th; the visitors have 3 wins this season versus 0 for Start, providing Vålerenga a clear points advantage. In the last five matches both teams scored 6 goals each, but Start conceded as many as 18 goals in that period versus Vålerenga’s 12, highlighting the home side’s weaker defence. The visitors also have superior shot quality — Vålerenga average 5.25 shots on target and 13.75 attempts per away game versus Start’s 3.75 on target and 12.5 attempts, and higher average xG of 1.60 compared to the home side’s 1.43. Additionally, Start have only 0.2 points per game in their last 5 matches versus 0.8 for Vålerenga, so I assess probabilities as 55% for the away win, 25% for a draw and 20% for the home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Start concedes on average 1.4 goals per match this season, but in the last 5 matches concedes as much as 3.6 goals per match (18 goals in 5 matches), while Vålerenga concedes 1.75 goals in the season and 2.4 goals in the last 5 matches (12 goals in 5 matches). In attack Start scores 1.2 goals per match this season, Vålerenga 1.0, and in the last 5 matches both teams average 1.2 goals; xG is 1.67 for Start and 1.60 for Vålerenga, which suggests realistic chances of goal exchange. Clean sheets are rare: Start has 20% clean sheets, Vålerenga 25%, and the league BTTS average is 53%; season BTTS is 40% (Start) and 50% (Vålerenga), but in the last 5 matches BTTS is 80% for Start and 60% for Vålerenga. Start averages 15.4 shots (4.6 on target) per match, Vålerenga 13.75 shots (5.25 on target), and the league averages 2.99 goals per match, which supports a both teams to score scenario. Considering the high xG (1.67 and 1.60), Start's poor defense in the last 5 matches (3.6 goals conceded) and recent BTTS rates (80% vs 60%), I tip BTTS - Yes with a probability of 70% versus 30% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: Start has an attacking xG of 1.67, Vålerenga 1.60, and average xG conceded is 1.87 for Start and 1.45 for Vålerenga; averaging these values yields expected 1.56 goals for Start and 1.74 for Vålerenga, total 3.30 goals. With an expected goals total of 3.30 the Poisson model gives probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) around 84%, at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) around 64% and at least 4 goals (Over 3.5) around 42%. Team data confirm this: Start have scored 10 and conceded 26 goals this season, conceding an average of 3.6 goals in the last 5 matches (18 conceded), Vålerenga have 10 scored and 14 conceded and concede an average of 2.4 goals in the last 5; both teams have 100% of matches with at least 1 goal, and Over 2.5 occurred in the last 5 matches in 80% (Start) and 60% (Vålerenga). Additionally Start average 15.4 shots with 4.6 on target, Vålerenga 13.75 with 5.25 on target with conversion rates around 8%/7%, which supports xG levels of 1.56/1.74 and indicates chance creation. Considering the combined projection of 3.30 goals and the high 84% for Over 1.5 (seasonal Over 1.5: Start 60%, Vålerenga 75%), I recommend backing the Over line at 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome: Start were level at the break in 60% of their matches, Vålerenga in 50%, giving an average probability of around 55% for a halftime draw. Over the full 90 minutes the home side holds a clear advantage — Start have won 40% of matches this season versus Vålerenga’s 25%. At home Start average 1.2 goals and 1.4 points per match, while the visitors average 1.0 goals and 1.0 points. xG supports balanced attacking output (xG 1.67 for Start vs 1.6 for Vålerenga), but Start concede more chances (xG against Start 1.87 vs 1.45 against Vålerenga), which points to decisive goals after the break. Additionally Start score on average 0.8 goals before halftime compared to Vålerenga’s 0.5, so a late goal and a home turnaround after the break is realistic. Therefore the strongest and most probable signal from the data is a Half-Time draw and a Start victory at Full-Time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Start | Vålerenga | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Vålerenga is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Start · 0.8 pts / match - Vålerenga
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vålerenga is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Start · 1.11 goals / match - Vålerenga
Vålerenga is 67% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.6 goals / match - Start · 1.56 goals / match - Vålerenga
Start scores in 80% of matches (8 of 10 matches), while Vålerenga keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).
Vålerenga scores in 67% of matches (6 of 9 matches), while Start keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 10 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Start
Over / Under - Vålerenga
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Vålerenga is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.9 pts / match - Start · 1.22 pts / match - Vålerenga
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Start - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Vålerenga - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 2.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -10 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Start
Vålerenga
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).
Teams vs league
| Start | Liga | Vålerenga | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.60 | 3.00 | ▼ 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 80% | 54% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 55% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 24% | ▼ 22% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 80% | 82% | ▼ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 79% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Start vs Vålerenga?
The Eliteserien match finished Start 2:0 Vålerenga. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Start vs Vålerenga?
Start score 1.00 goals per game on average and Vålerenga 1.11. The Eliteserien average is 3.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Start's matches and 44% of Vålerenga's.
What form are Start and Vålerenga in?
Over the last 5 games Start have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Vålerenga 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Start vs Vålerenga?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


