England - EFL League OneData current as of 11 September 2026

Stevenage vs Reading: match statistics

Stevenage crest
Stevenage
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Reading crest
Reading
135%(1.90)
X35%(3.40)
230%(4.20)

The match appears evenly poised, suggesting a draw. Stevenage is displaying impressive home form with a 56% win rate and a solid goal difference (+10). However, Reading boasts better recent form (2.0 PPG vs 1.8 PPG) and superior away scoring efficiency (1.53 goals/match). The hosts are very strong at home with a 50% clean sheet rate, but Reading scores consistently (84% of matches with a goal). xG statistics show a slight home advantage for Stevenage (1.29 vs 1.24), yet Reading has a better shot conversion rate (14% vs 11%). Considering the hosts' defensive solidity and the visitors' attacking threat, the most probable outcome is a share of the points, although Stevenage holds a slight edge due to the home advantage.

Stevenage vs Reading: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Stevenage played Reading in EFL League One (England). The match was played on 21 March 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Stevenage: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Reading: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Stevenage scores 1.08 and concedes 1.03 goals per match. Reading scores 1.50 and concedes 1.32. League average: 2.62 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Stevenage 49%, Reading 71%. Over 2.5: Stevenage 41%, Reading 50%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Reading has higher xG: 1.27 vs 1.19. Stevenage: 9.9 shots per match, Reading: 11.3.

Match halves

Stevenage: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.62. Reading: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.82.

Goals by minute

Stevenage: 46-60 (10 goals). Reading: 76-90+ (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League One: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The match appears evenly poised, suggesting a draw. Stevenage is displaying impressive home form with a 56% win rate and a solid goal difference (+10). However, Reading boasts better recent form (2.0 PPG vs 1.8 PPG) and superior away scoring efficiency (1.53 goals/match). The hosts are very strong at home with a 50% clean sheet rate, but Reading scores consistently (84% of matches with a goal). xG statistics show a slight home advantage for Stevenage (1.29 vs 1.24), yet Reading has a better shot conversion rate (14% vs 11%). Considering the hosts' defensive solidity and the visitors' attacking threat, the most probable outcome is a share of the points, although Stevenage holds a slight edge due to the home advantage.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
StevenageReading
14Shots4
StevenageReading
4Shots on target1
StevenageReading
1.52xG0.54
StevenageReading
4Corners2
StevenageReading
48Dangerous attacks28
StevenageReading
6Fouls16
StevenageReading
2Cards2
StevenageReading

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.08Goals scored / match1.5
StevenageReading
1.03Goals conceded / match1.32
StevenageReading
45%Average possession50%
StevenageReading
3.54Shots on target / match4.05
StevenageReading

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.95Shots per match11.29
StevenageReading
3.54Shots on target4.05
StevenageReading
10.9%Shot conversion13.3%
StevenageReading
45%Possession50%
StevenageReading
1.19xG for1.27
StevenageReading
1.14xG against1.44
StevenageReading

Shooting quality

Stevenage: BalancedReading: Efficient finishing
StevenageReading
Accuracy (shots on target)36%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Reading is 11% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Stevenage · 2 pts / match - Reading

Stevenage
WWLWL
Season result split
43% W24% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-9-12
1.54 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-6-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Reading
WWLDW
Season result split
39% W34% D26% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-13-10
1.53 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-6-7
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Reading is 39% better for: goals scored per match.

1.08 goals / match - Stevenage · 1.5 goals / match - Reading

Stevenage is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.03 goals / match - Stevenage · 1.32 goals / match - Reading

Stevenage scoring profile: very strong

Stevenage scores in 73% of matches (27 of 37 matches), while Reading keeps a clean sheet in 18% (7 of 38 matches).

Reading scoring profile: very strong

Reading scores in 89% of matches (34 of 38 matches), while Stevenage keeps a clean sheet in 35% (13 of 37 matches).

40Goals scored (season)57
StevenageReading
38Goals conceded (season)50
StevenageReading
2.11Average goals in match2.82
StevenageReading
5Goals scored (last 5)9
StevenageReading
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
StevenageReading

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal89%
StevenageReading
27%2 goals45%
StevenageReading
8%3 goals13%
StevenageReading
0%4 goals3%
StevenageReading

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal82%
StevenageReading
27%2 goals42%
StevenageReading
11%3 goals8%
StevenageReading
0%4 goals0%
StevenageReading

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time24%
StevenageReading
5%BTTS in both halves13%
StevenageReading
14%Scored in both halves29%
StevenageReading

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
StevenageReading
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
StevenageReading
40%BTTS - last 580%
StevenageReading

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

51%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
StevenageReading
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
StevenageReading
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
StevenageReading

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
StevenageReading
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
StevenageReading
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
StevenageReading

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Reading is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.27 pts / match - Stevenage · 1.5 pts / match - Reading

Stevenage - half-time state
22% leading62% draw16% trailing
Reading - half-time state
34% leading47% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.27Points per match (1st half)1.5
StevenageReading
0.46Goals scored (1st half)0.68
StevenageReading
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
StevenageReading
0.86Average goals (1st half)1.11
StevenageReading
65%Clean sheet before half-time58%
StevenageReading
59%No goal before half-time47%
StevenageReading

After half-time (2nd half)

1.24Points per match (2nd half)1.26
StevenageReading
0.62Goals scored (2nd half)0.82
StevenageReading
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)0.89
StevenageReading
1.24Average goals (2nd half)1.71
StevenageReading
51%Clean sheet after half-time32%
StevenageReading
54%No goal after half-time34%
StevenageReading

Stevenage - second-half results

27% W43% D30% L
47
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding195%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Reading - second-half results

32% W32% D37% L
57
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Stevenage - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.20.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Reading - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Stevenage
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
8
6
16-30
7
4
31-45
10
5
46-60
6
11
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Reading
ScoredConceded
7
8
0-15
7
4
16-30
12
4
31-45
6
10
46-60
10
15
61-75
15
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.47
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-59%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Stevenage

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Reading

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
133%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).

Teams vs league

StevenageLigaReading
Average goals in match 2.112.62 2.82
Both teams scored 49%53% 71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 41%51% 50%
Clean sheets 35%26% 18%
Goal before half-time 51%71% 71%
Goal after half-time 68%80% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.62
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. StevenageYellow cardJamie Tyrrell Reid
  2. ReadingSubstitutionOn: Patrick John LaneOff: Randell Williams
  3. ReadingYellow cardJeriel Dorsett
  4. StevenageSubstitutionOn: Daniel KempOff: Louis Thompson
  5. ReadingYellow cardPadhraic John O'Connor
  6. StevenageGoalDaniel Kemp
  7. ReadingSubstitutionOn: Andy YiadomOff: Ryan Nyambe

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Scott OldhamMatches officiated: 17
4.29Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 259%Home wins28%Draws12%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Stevenage 0 - 0 - 1 Reading. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Reading FC
1 : 0
Stevenage FC

FAQ

What was the result of Stevenage vs Reading?

The EFL League One match finished Stevenage 1:0 Reading. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Stevenage vs Reading?

Stevenage score 1.08 goals per game on average and Reading 1.50. The EFL League One average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 49% of Stevenage's matches and 71% of Reading's.

What form are Stevenage and Reading in?

Over the last 5 games Stevenage have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Reading 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Stevenage vs Reading?

The statistical background for Stevenage vs Reading — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.