Stevenage vs Wigan Athletic: match statistics
Stevenage vs Wigan Athletic: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Stevenage played Wigan Athletic in EFL League One (England). The match was played on 2 May 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Stevenage: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Wigan Athletic: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Stevenage scores 1.07 and concedes 1.02 goals per match. Wigan Athletic scores 1.09 and concedes 1.27. League average: 2.60 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Stevenage 47%, Wigan Athletic 44%. Over 2.5: Stevenage 38%, Wigan Athletic 36%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Wigan Athletic has higher xG: 1.21 vs 1.19. Stevenage: 9.9 shots per match, Wigan Athletic: 10.3.
Match halves
Stevenage: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.60. Wigan Athletic: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.60.
Goals by minute
Stevenage: 16-30 (10 goals). Wigan Athletic: 0-15 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League One: 2.60 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a Stevenage win (1): the hosts have won 59% of their home matches, concede only 0.59 goals per game at their stadium on average and keep a clean sheet in 55% of home fixtures. Wigan win just 14% of away matches, concede 1.82 goals on average on the road and have only 9% clean sheets away, although in their last 5 games they scored 8 goals and recorded 3 wins (2.0 points per game). The quality of chances favors the hosts: Stevenage average 1.30 xG at home with 3.95 shots on target from 10.59 attempts, while Wigan away average 1.12 xG, 3.23 on target and 9.27 attempts. Additionally, the hosts fail to score in only 14% of home games compared with 27% of Wigan’s away matches, and the difference in average goals conceded (0.59 vs 1.82) is key to Stevenage’s defensive advantage. Considering the superior xG and defensive stability of the hosts despite similar season goal totals (Stevenage 48 vs Wigan 49), I assess the probabilities at approximately 65% for the hosts, 20% for a draw and 15% for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes because Wigan has a season BTTS rate of 68% and scored 8 goals in the last 5 matches (1.6 per game), while Stevenage conceded 8 goals in that period (1.6 per game), increasing the likelihood both teams score. Although Stevenage have only 22% of season matches with both teams scoring and 48% clean sheets, their last 5 fixtures show the opposite trend (BTTS 60%), so recent form favors goals. xG comparison supports this: Stevenage offensive xG is 1.29 versus the xG Wigan concedes (1.61), and Wigan offensive xG is 1.12 versus xG conceded by Stevenage 1.2 — both sides generate roughly 1.1–1.3 xG. Additionally, shots and accuracy (11.26 and 3.39 for Stevenage vs 9.27 and 3.23 for Wigan) and conversion (9% vs 12%) suggest both teams have realistic tools to score at least once, therefore a 60% split for YES and 40% for NO is most justified.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-and-defensive-data model yields expected goals of 1.45 for Stevenage and 1.16 for Wigan (total 2.61), calculated as the home attack average (xG 1.29) and the visitors’ average conceded (xG against 1.61) and vice versa. With aggregate λ=2.61 the Poisson distribution implies ~73% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~48% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~27% for at least 4 goals (Over 3.5). Season data confirm a moderately high goal potential: Wigan have 86% of matches with over 1.5 goals and 45% with over 2.5, and BTTS in 68% of fixtures; Stevenage at home have 57% of matches with over 1.5 goals, 48% clean sheets and concede on average only 0.74 goals, which reduces the risk of a very high scoreline. Last 5 matches form aligns with the model: Wigan scored 8 and conceded 3 with mean xG 1.30, while Stevenage in their last 5 scored 6 and conceded 8 with mean xG 1.03, showing away offensive activity and home defensive solidity. In summary, the strongest betting signal is Over 1.5 — the combined mean 2.61 and Wigan’s high share of matches with at least 2 goals (86%) provide the best probability-to-risk ratio (~73% vs. risk).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Stevenage led at the break in 35% of matches and has a 48% win rate this season, while Wigan win only 14% of fixtures, giving the home side a clear advantage in the final result. At half-time Stevenage keep a clean sheet in 74% of matches and concede on average 0.3 goals by the break, whereas Wigan concede on average 1.0 goals by half-time, so the hosts are statistically harder to break down in the first 45 minutes. Stevenage generate xG 1.29 versus Wigan's 1.12 and register an average of 3.39 shots on target compared to Wigan's 3.23, suggesting slightly higher quality and offensive activity from the home side. Wigan do record BTTS in 68% of their matches, but have only 9% clean sheets this season, meaning they concede more often than they keep clean sheets; this reinforces the scenario that Stevenage will maintain the lead at the break. On that basis the most likely outcome is 1/1 (Stevenage leading at half-time and winning) with a 36% probability, and the second-strongest signal is X/1 (draw at half-time, home win) at 22%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Stevenage | Wigan Athletic | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Wigan Athletic is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Stevenage · 2 pts / match - Wigan Athletic
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Stevenage is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.02 goals / match - Stevenage · 1.27 goals / match - Wigan Athletic
Stevenage scores in 76% of matches (34 of 45 matches), while Wigan Athletic keeps a clean sheet in 29% (13 of 45 matches).
Wigan Athletic scores in 67% of matches (30 of 45 matches), while Stevenage keeps a clean sheet in 40% (18 of 45 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Stevenage
Over / Under - Wigan Athletic
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Stevenage is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / match - Stevenage · 1.16 pts / match - Wigan Athletic
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Stevenage - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Wigan Athletic - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Stevenage
Wigan Athletic
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).
Teams vs league
| Stevenage | Liga | Wigan Athletic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.09 | 2.60 | ▼ 2.36 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 52% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 50% | ▼ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 27% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 51% | 70% | • 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 80% | ▼ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Stevenage 0 - 1 - 0 Wigan Athletic. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Stevenage vs Wigan Athletic?
The EFL League One match finished Stevenage 1:0 Wigan Athletic. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Stevenage vs Wigan Athletic?
Stevenage score 1.07 goals per game on average and Wigan Athletic 1.09. The EFL League One average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Stevenage's matches and 44% of Wigan Athletic's.
What form are Stevenage and Wigan Athletic in?
Over the last 5 games Stevenage have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Wigan Athletic 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Stevenage vs Wigan Athletic?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


