Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon: match statistics
Stockport County demonstrates significantly better home form with a 56% win rate at home and a positive goal difference (+6) at their own stadium. The hosts hold an advantage in key offensive statistics, with an average of 1.56 goals per game and a higher xG (1.63 vs 1.13). AFC Wimbledon has poor away form with only a 32% win rate and a negative goal difference (-11), conceding an average of 1.89 goals per game away from home. Additionally, the visitors fail to keep a clean sheet in 89% of away matches, which, given Stockport's offensive potential, represents a significant weakness. Despite similar form in the last five matches for both teams (1.4 points per game each), the home advantage and better home statistics favor a home win, although AFC Wimbledon may put up tough resistance.
Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Stockport County played AFC Wimbledon in EFL League One (England). The match was played on 28 March 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Stockport County: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. AFC Wimbledon: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Stockport County scores 1.38 and concedes 1.30 goals per match. AFC Wimbledon scores 1.29 and concedes 1.45. League average: 2.61 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Stockport County 62%, AFC Wimbledon 53%. Over 2.5: Stockport County 57%, AFC Wimbledon 50%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
Stockport County has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.24. Stockport County: 12.6 shots per match, AFC Wimbledon: 11.0.
Match halves
Stockport County: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.73. AFC Wimbledon: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.68.
Goals by minute
Stockport County: 76-90+ (13 goals). AFC Wimbledon: 61-75 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League One: 2.61 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Stockport County demonstrates significantly better home form with a 56% win rate at home and a positive goal difference (+6) at their own stadium. The hosts hold an advantage in key offensive statistics, with an average of 1.56 goals per game and a higher xG (1.63 vs 1.13). AFC Wimbledon has poor away form with only a 32% win rate and a negative goal difference (-11), conceding an average of 1.89 goals per game away from home. Additionally, the visitors fail to keep a clean sheet in 89% of away matches, which, given Stockport's offensive potential, represents a significant weakness. Despite similar form in the last five matches for both teams (1.4 points per game each), the home advantage and better home statistics favor a home win, although AFC Wimbledon may put up tough resistance.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal data suggests an elevated BTTS risk, particularly from the visitors' side: AFC Wimbledon has only 11% clean sheets and a high average of conceded goals at 1.89, which increases Stockport's chances to score. At the same time, Wimbledon scores regularly (1.32 goals/match), and Stockport concedes an average of 1.0 goals with an xGA of 1.20, so an away goal is realistic. BTTS metrics support the 'yes' pick: seasonally 47% for Stockport and 58% for Wimbledon, and in the last 5 matches 80% and 60% respectively, indicating a goal-scoring trend. Creation stats from the last 5 matches (xG: 1.84 vs 1.70) and average shots on target (3.63 vs 3.0) suggest both teams should generate goal-scoring opportunities. Additionally, the league's BTTS rate of 52% is not discouraging, and Wimbledon's weaker defense increases the probability that both teams will score in this match.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model indicates an elevated scoring potential primarily on the home side: Stockport has a solid xG for at home (1.34), while Wimbledon generates high xG against away (1.51) and concedes an average of 1.89 goals per match, with just 11% clean sheets. This signal is further supported by the fact that Wimbledon has Over 0.5 in 100% of matches, and Stockport in 89%, which strongly limits low-scoring scenarios. In the last 5 matches, both teams have boosted their creativity (xG for: 1.84 vs 1.70), and BTTS in this period is high (Stockport 80%, Wimbledon 60%), which increases the chances for at least 2 goals. At the same time, Stockport's seasonal distribution (Under 2.5 = 63%) and generally moderate Over 3.5 rates suggest that the match most often finishes below 4 goals. The strongest and most probable choice is Over 1.5, as it combines high frequency of occurrence with Wimbledon's clear defensive weaknesses.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal at half-time is a draw: Stockport draws at HT in 42% of matches, while Wimbledon does so in as many as 58%. Stockport is very solid in the first halves (averaging 0.26 goals conceded before HT and 74% clean sheets at the break), limiting the visitors' chances to take a lead. Over the longer horizon, the quality advantage lies with the hosts: better PPG (1.47 vs. 1.16), higher xG (1.34 vs. 1.13), and more shots taken (12.16 vs. 9.79). Wimbledon has a clearly weaker defense this season (1.89 goals conceded/match; xGA 1.51) and additionally concedes many goals after the break (1.11 goals conceded in the 2nd half), which favors a turnaround in favor of Stockport late in the game. Therefore, the most likely Half-Time/Full-Time scenario is a draw at half-time and a Stockport victory in the match.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Stockport County | AFC Wimbledon | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
AFC Wimbledon is 75% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Stockport County · 1.4 pts / match - AFC Wimbledon
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Stockport County is 7% better for: goals scored per match.
1.38 goals / match - Stockport County · 1.29 goals / match - AFC Wimbledon
Stockport County is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.3 goals / match - Stockport County · 1.45 goals / match - AFC Wimbledon
Stockport County scores in 81% of matches (30 of 37 matches), while AFC Wimbledon keeps a clean sheet in 18% (7 of 38 matches).
AFC Wimbledon scores in 66% of matches (25 of 38 matches), while Stockport County keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 37 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Stockport County
Over / Under - AFC Wimbledon
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Stockport County - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
AFC Wimbledon - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Stockport County
AFC Wimbledon
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).
Teams vs league
| Stockport County | Liga | AFC Wimbledon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.68 | 2.61 | ▲ 2.74 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 62% | 52% | • 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 51% | • 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 27% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 71% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 80% | ▲ 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon?
The EFL League One match finished Stockport County 3:0 AFC Wimbledon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon?
Stockport County score 1.38 goals per game on average and AFC Wimbledon 1.29. The EFL League One average is 2.61 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Stockport County's matches and 53% of AFC Wimbledon's.
What form are Stockport County and AFC Wimbledon in?
Over the last 5 games Stockport County have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and AFC Wimbledon 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon?
The statistical background for Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


