England - EFL League OneData current as of 13 September 2026

Stockport County vs Port Vale: match statistics

Stockport County crest
Stockport County
1 : 2half-time 0:2
Port Vale crest
Port Vale

Stockport County vs Port Vale: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Stockport County played Port Vale in EFL League One (England). The match was played on 28 April 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Stockport County: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Port Vale: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Stockport County scores 1.52 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Port Vale scores 0.77 and concedes 1.32. League average: 2.61 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Stockport County 59%, Port Vale 34%. Over 2.5: Stockport County 59%, Port Vale 39%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Stockport County has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.25. Stockport County: 13.2 shots per match, Port Vale: 11.1.

Match halves

Stockport County: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.80. Port Vale: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.39.

Goals by minute

Stockport County: 76-90+ (16 goals). Port Vale: 0-15 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League One: 2.61 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Stockport is the clear favourite: at home they score on average 1.68 goals per game with xG 1.70 and have a 59% win rate at their stadium, whereas Port Vale on the road score only 0.77 goals on average with xG 1.10 and win 23% of away matches. The hosts create far more chances — on average 14.73 shots and 5.14 on target at home versus 9.59 shots and 2.68 on target for the visitors — and maintain 57% possession compared to Port Vale’s 45%. Defensively the visitors fare worse: Port Vale concede 1.59 goals on average away, while Stockport concede only 1.09 at home; additionally the visitors fail to score in 50% of away games versus 14% of home matches without a goal for Stockport. In the last 5 matches Stockport have scored 9 goals (1.8 avg) and accumulate around 1.4 points per game, while Port Vale have 4 goals (0.8 avg) and about 1.0 point per game, which confirms the hosts’ advantage and leads to backing their victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS rates are low: Stockport has BTTS 36% and Port Vale 32%, averaging 34% and indicating a low baseline chance for both teams to score. However, in the last 5 matches Stockport records BTTS 60% and Port Vale 40% (50% average), and clean sheet rates are 36% for the home side and 23% for the visitors, implying probabilities of conceding of about 64% and 77%; their product gives roughly a 49% chance that both teams will concede. Combined xG is 1.39 (Stockport) + 1.10 (Port Vale) = 2.49 xG, with 1.39 against an opponent xG against of 1.48 and 1.10 against 1.29, suggesting a sufficient number of scoring opportunities from both sides. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 9 and conceded 8 goals (1.8 and 1.6 on average), while Port Vale scored 4 and conceded 4 (0.8 and 0.8), so Stockport is more offensively active but the visitors also tend to concede. Considering the mixed signals (seasonally low BTTS 34% versus recent form, combined xG 2.49 and an estimated 49% when accounting for clean sheets), I give a slight edge to the "yes" option and estimate 52% vs 48%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I calculated expected goals as the average of attack and defense: home ~1.44 (attacking xG 1.39 vs away defense 1.48), away ~1.20 (attacking xG 1.10 vs home defense 1.29), total ~2.64 goals. According to a Poisson distribution, the probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) is about 74% (P(0)+P(1) ≈ 26%), while Over 2.5 is ~49% and Over 3.5 ~27%. Additionally, in the last 5 matches Stockport scored 9 goals (1.8 avg) with xG 2.12, and Port Vale 4 goals (0.8 avg) with xG 1.22 — a combined 13 goals in 5 matches (2.6 per match), which confirms a higher goal rate than the minimal line of 1.5. Seasonal metrics also support this pick: Over 0.5 is 73% for the home side and 95% for the away, and although the seasonal percentage for Over 2.5 is closer to 50%, the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (74% vs 26%), hence the recommendation Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Stockport draw at half-time in 55% of their home matches, while Port Vale record a draw in 45% of their away games, so the strongest signal for the break is a draw. The home side have a higher xG: 1.39 versus the visitors' 1.10, and Port Vale also have a worse xG against (1.48) than Stockport (1.29), which gives Stockport an advantage in chance creation. In the second half Stockport have scored an average of 1.0 goals in their last 5 home matches, whereas Port Vale average only 0.2 on the road, with the visitors conceding 1.59 goals per match compared to the hosts' 1.05 conceded, increasing the likelihood of a turnaround by the home side after the break. Taking these figures into account, the most probable scenario is a draw at half-time and a Stockport win at full-time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

66Possession (%)34
Stockport CountyPort Vale
13Shots10
Stockport CountyPort Vale
2Shots on target4
Stockport CountyPort Vale
1.24xG1.03
Stockport CountyPort Vale
7Corners1
Stockport CountyPort Vale
39Dangerous attacks17
Stockport CountyPort Vale
9Fouls9
Stockport CountyPort Vale
2Cards0
Stockport CountyPort Vale

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Stockport CountyPort Vale
1.52Goals scored / match0.77
Stockport CountyPort Vale
1.25Goals conceded / match1.32
Stockport CountyPort Vale
55%Average possession46%
Stockport CountyPort Vale
4.82Shots on target / match3.14
Stockport CountyPort Vale

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.23Shots per match11.11
Stockport CountyPort Vale
4.82Shots on target3.14
Stockport CountyPort Vale
11.5%Shot conversion7%
Stockport CountyPort Vale
55%Possession46%
Stockport CountyPort Vale
1.53xG for1.25
Stockport CountyPort Vale
1.29xG against1.39
Stockport CountyPort Vale

Shooting quality

Stockport County: BalancedPort Vale: Balanced
Stockport CountyPort Vale
Accuracy (shots on target)36%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Stockport County is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Stockport County · 1 pts / match - Port Vale

Stockport County
DWDLW
Season result split
48% W25% D27% L
Season (W-D-L)
21-11-12
1.68 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
13-4-5
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.95Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Port Vale
DWDLL
Season result split
20% W27% D52% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-12-23
0.89 pts / match · goal difference -24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-14
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Stockport County is 97% better for: goals scored per match.

1.52 goals / match - Stockport County · 0.77 goals / match - Port Vale

Stockport County is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.25 goals / match - Stockport County · 1.32 goals / match - Port Vale

Stockport County scoring profile: very strong

Stockport County scores in 82% of matches (36 of 44 matches), while Port Vale keeps a clean sheet in 30% (13 of 44 matches).

Port Vale scoring profile: mixed

Port Vale scores in 48% of matches (21 of 44 matches), while Stockport County keeps a clean sheet in 27% (12 of 44 matches).

67Goals scored (season)34
Stockport CountyPort Vale
55Goals conceded (season)58
Stockport CountyPort Vale
2.77Average goals in match2.09
Stockport CountyPort Vale
10Goals scored (last 5)4
Stockport CountyPort Vale
7Goals conceded (last 5)4
Stockport CountyPort Vale

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal48%
Stockport CountyPort Vale
48%2 goals20%
Stockport CountyPort Vale
18%3 goals5%
Stockport CountyPort Vale
5%4 goals2%
Stockport CountyPort Vale

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal70%
Stockport CountyPort Vale
34%2 goals34%
Stockport CountyPort Vale
16%3 goals18%
Stockport CountyPort Vale
2%4 goals7%
Stockport CountyPort Vale

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

59%
Stockport County - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.26 of 44 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time16%
Stockport CountyPort Vale
11%BTTS in both halves5%
Stockport CountyPort Vale
32%Scored in both halves9%
Stockport CountyPort Vale

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
Stockport CountyPort Vale
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Stockport CountyPort Vale
60%BTTS - last 540%
Stockport CountyPort Vale

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
Stockport CountyPort Vale
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
Stockport CountyPort Vale
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Stockport CountyPort Vale

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
Stockport CountyPort Vale
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
Stockport CountyPort Vale
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Stockport CountyPort Vale

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Stockport County is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.41 pts / match - Stockport County · 1.11 pts / match - Port Vale

Stockport County - half-time state
32% leading45% draw23% trailing
Port Vale - half-time state
20% leading50% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.41Points per match (1st half)1.11
Stockport CountyPort Vale
0.73Goals scored (1st half)0.39
Stockport CountyPort Vale
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
Stockport CountyPort Vale
1.27Average goals (1st half)0.98
Stockport CountyPort Vale
55%Clean sheet before half-time59%
Stockport CountyPort Vale
45%No goal before half-time68%
Stockport CountyPort Vale

After half-time (2nd half)

1.43Points per match (2nd half)0.86
Stockport CountyPort Vale
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)0.39
Stockport CountyPort Vale
0.7Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
Stockport CountyPort Vale
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.11
Stockport CountyPort Vale
48%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Stockport CountyPort Vale
41%No goal after half-time75%
Stockport CountyPort Vale

Stockport County - second-half results

41% W20% D39% L
62
Half-time points
32
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
63
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Port Vale - second-half results

14% W45% D41% L
49
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Stockport County - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4
Port Vale - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Stockport County
ScoredConceded
9
5
0-15
11
8
16-30
12
11
31-45
10
9
46-60
9
10
61-75
16
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Port Vale
ScoredConceded
9
7
0-15
3
11
16-30
5
8
31-45
8
12
46-60
3
10
61-75
6
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.43
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
39%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Stockport County

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Port Vale

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).

Teams vs league

Stockport CountyLigaPort Vale
Average goals in match 2.772.61 2.09
Both teams scored 59%52% 34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%50% 39%
Clean sheets 27%27% 30%
Goal before half-time 75%70% 57%
Goal after half-time 89%81% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.61
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.48
Home goals / match
1.12
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Port ValeGoalJordan GabrielAssist: George Hall
  2. Stockport CountyYellow cardChe Gardner
  3. Port ValeSubstitutionOn: Ben HeneghanOff: Grant Ward
  4. Stockport CountyGoalOdin BaileyAssist: Oliver Norwood
  5. Stockport CountyYellow cardBen Osborn

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Alex ChilowiczMatches officiated: 13
3.46Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 262%Home wins23%Draws15%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Stockport County 1 - 0 - 0 Port Vale. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Port Vale FC
0 : 3
Stockport County FC

FAQ

What was the result of Stockport County vs Port Vale?

The EFL League One match finished Stockport County 1:2 Port Vale. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Stockport County vs Port Vale?

Stockport County score 1.52 goals per game on average and Port Vale 0.77. The EFL League One average is 2.61 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Stockport County's matches and 34% of Port Vale's.

What form are Stockport County and Port Vale in?

Over the last 5 games Stockport County have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Port Vale 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Stockport County vs Port Vale?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.