England - ChampionshipData current as of 13 September 2026

Stoke City vs Queens Park Rangers: match statistics

155%(2.10)
X25%(3.30)
220%(3.40)

Stoke City presents solid home form with a 50% win rate in home matches and a positive goal difference of +8 at their own stadium. The hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches, earning 2 points per match during this period, evidencing a stable disposition. Queens Park Rangers are noting poor away form with just 31% away victories and a negative goal difference of -8, conceding an average of 1.69 goals per match. The visitors are in a crisis, gaining only 0.8 points per match in the last five games, with one win and three losses. Stoke City holds the advantage in possession (54% vs 46%) and higher shot accuracy, which, combined with the home field advantage, gives them a real chance of victory. Considering all statistics, the hosts are the favorites for this meeting, although QPR is capable of scoring goals, which could make the match competitive.

Stoke City vs Queens Park Rangers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Stoke City played Queens Park Rangers in Championship (England). The match was played on 17 January 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Stoke City: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Queens Park Rangers: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Stoke City scores 1.23 and concedes 0.88 goals per match. Queens Park Rangers scores 1.46 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.62 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Stoke City 35%, Queens Park Rangers 73%. Over 2.5: Stoke City 42%, Queens Park Rangers 65%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Queens Park Rangers has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.31. Stoke City: 11.5 shots per match, Queens Park Rangers: 12.7.

Match halves

Stoke City: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.69. Queens Park Rangers: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.81.

Goals by minute

Stoke City: 46-60 (8 goals). Queens Park Rangers: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Championship: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Stoke City presents solid home form with a 50% win rate in home matches and a positive goal difference of +8 at their own stadium. The hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches, earning 2 points per match during this period, evidencing a stable disposition. Queens Park Rangers are noting poor away form with just 31% away victories and a negative goal difference of -8, conceding an average of 1.69 goals per match. The visitors are in a crisis, gaining only 0.8 points per match in the last five games, with one win and three losses. Stoke City holds the advantage in possession (54% vs 46%) and higher shot accuracy, which, combined with the home field advantage, gives them a real chance of victory. Considering all statistics, the hosts are the favorites for this meeting, although QPR is capable of scoring goals, which could make the match competitive.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

73Possession (%)27
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
12Shots7
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
3Shots on target2
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
1.4xG0.73
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
6Corners2
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
58Dangerous attacks19
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
11Fouls10
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
3Cards4
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
1.23Goals scored / match1.46
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
0.88Goals conceded / match1.5
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
53%Average possession47%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
4.04Shots on target / match3.92
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.5Shots per match12.65
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
4.04Shots on target3.92
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
10.7%Shot conversion11.6%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
53%Possession47%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
1.31xG for1.41
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
1.31xG against1.32
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers

Shooting quality

Stoke City: BalancedQueens Park Rangers: Balanced
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
Accuracy (shots on target)35%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Stoke City
LDLWW
Season result split
46% W15% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-4-10
1.54 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-2-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Queens Park Rangers
WDLLW
Season result split
42% W19% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-5-10
1.46 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Queens Park Rangers is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

1.23 goals / match - Stoke City · 1.46 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers

Stoke City is 70% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.88 goals / match - Stoke City · 1.5 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers

Stoke City scoring profile: strong

Stoke City scores in 65% of matches (17 of 26 matches), while Queens Park Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 matches).

Queens Park Rangers scoring profile: very strong

Queens Park Rangers scores in 88% of matches (23 of 26 matches), while Stoke City keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 matches).

32Goals scored (season)38
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
23Goals conceded (season)39
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
2.12Average goals in match2.96
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
4Goals scored (last 5)10
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
3Goals conceded (last 5)6
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal88%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
31%2 goals31%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
19%3 goals23%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
4%4 goals4%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal77%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
19%2 goals38%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
4%3 goals15%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
4%4 goals8%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

73%
Queens Park Rangers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.19 of 26 matches
58%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time19%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
0%BTTS in both halves4%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
15%Scored in both halves23%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS62%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
20%BTTS - last 580%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time46%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Stoke City is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.46 pts / match - Stoke City · 1.27 pts / match - Queens Park Rangers

Stoke City - half-time state
35% leading42% draw23% trailing
Queens Park Rangers - half-time state
31% leading35% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.46Points per match (1st half)1.27
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.65
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.81
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
0.92Average goals (1st half)1.46
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
77%Clean sheet before half-time54%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
65%No goal before half-time50%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.46Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)0.81
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.69
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
1.19Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
58%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers
54%No goal after half-time38%
Stoke CityQueens Park Rangers

Stoke City - second-half results

35% W42% D23% L
38
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.46
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Queens Park Rangers - second-half results

38% W35% D27% L
33
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Stoke City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.21.2
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Queens Park Rangers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match1.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.61.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+40
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Stoke City
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
4
3
16-30
5
3
31-45
8
4
46-60
7
2
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Queens Park Rangers
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
3
7
16-30
10
10
31-45
3
10
46-60
7
4
61-75
11
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.54
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-61%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
57%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Stoke City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

Queens Park Rangers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).

Teams vs league

Stoke CityLigaQueens Park Rangers
Average goals in match 2.122.62 2.96
Both teams scored 35%58% 73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 42%52% 65%
Clean sheets 38%24% 23%
Goal before half-time 58%73% 77%
Goal after half-time 65%78% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.62
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.18
Away goals / match
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Queens Park RangersYellow cardAmadou Salif Mbengue
  2. Stoke CityYellow cardBenjamin David Pearson
  3. Stoke CityYellow cardDivin Mubama
  4. Stoke CityYellow cardLamine Cisse
  5. Queens Park RangersYellow cardJimmy Dunne
  6. Stoke CitySubstitutionOn: Million ManhoefOff: Divin Mubama
  7. Queens Park RangersSubstitutionOn: Daniel BennieOff: Karamoko Kader Dembélé
  8. Stoke CitySubstitutionOn: Eric Junior BocatOff: Mohammed Bosun Lawal
  9. Queens Park RangersYellow cardRichard Kone
  10. Queens Park RangersSubstitutionOn: João Henrique Mendes da SilvaOff: Paul Patrick Smyth
  11. Queens Park RangersSubstitutionOn: Kealey AdamsonOff: Rayan Kolli
  12. Stoke CitySubstitutionOn: Tatsuki SekoOff: Benjamin David Pearson
  13. Queens Park RangersYellow cardDaniel Bennie

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Matt DonohueMatches officiated: 23
4.43Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 239%Home wins39%Draws22%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Stoke City 0 - 0 - 1 Queens Park Rangers. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Queens Park Rangers FC
1 : 0
Stoke City FC

FAQ

What was the result of Stoke City vs Queens Park Rangers?

The Championship match finished Stoke City 0:0 Queens Park Rangers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Stoke City vs Queens Park Rangers?

Stoke City score 1.23 goals per game on average and Queens Park Rangers 1.46. The Championship average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 35% of Stoke City's matches and 73% of Queens Park Rangers's.

What form are Stoke City and Queens Park Rangers in?

Over the last 5 games Stoke City have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Queens Park Rangers 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Stoke City vs Queens Park Rangers?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.