Stoke City vs Sheffield Wednesday: match statistics
Stoke City vs Sheffield Wednesday: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Stoke City played Sheffield Wednesday in Championship (England). The match was played on 3 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Stoke City: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Sheffield Wednesday: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Stoke City scores 1.18 and concedes 1.10 goals per match. Sheffield Wednesday scores 0.62 and concedes 2.03. League average: 2.58 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Stoke City 44%, Sheffield Wednesday 46%. Over 2.5: Stoke City 46%, Sheffield Wednesday 56%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Stoke City has higher xG: 1.30 vs 0.98. Stoke City: 11.3 shots per match, Sheffield Wednesday: 8.5.
Match halves
Stoke City: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.62. Sheffield Wednesday: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.31.
Goals by minute
Stoke City: 31-45+ (9 goals). Sheffield Wednesday: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Championship: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Stoke City holds a clear statistical advantage: at home they average 1.53 goals, 4.95 shots on target per game and xG 1.49, while Sheffield on the road scores only 0.74 goals, records 2.63 shots on target and xG 0.91. Defensively the hosts also perform better — Stoke concedes 1.11 goals per home game on average, whereas the visitors concede 2.00 goals per away game and have conceded 79 goals in the season versus Stoke’s 43. In the last 5 matches Stoke is earning 0.8 points per game, while Sheffield only 0.2 and have not won any of the five (0-1-4), which confirms the visitors’ poorer form. Additional home advantages include greater possession (53% vs 43%), a lower percentage of matches without scoring (26% vs 42%) and a positive home goal difference (+8), indicating better control and efficiency in home fixtures. Considering the higher xG, number of shots on target and the significant disparity in win rates at home (42% for Stoke vs 5% away for Sheffield), I forecast a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal for BTTS comes from the last 5 matches: both teams have 80% BTTS in their last five games, with Stoke scoring 1.6 and conceding 2.2 on average, while Sheffield scores 0.8 and concedes 2.2. Season-long signals are mixed — seasonal BTTS is 40% for Stoke and 53% for Sheffield, yet clean sheets are very low: 5% and 11%. Both teams concede a lot over the season (averages 2.05 and 2.00), and xG against is 1.65 vs 1.85, suggesting many permitted chances. Stoke generates more shots (9.45 vs 7.47) and has xG 1.05 vs Sheffield’s 0.91 with conversion rates 5% vs 10%, so genuine scoring opportunities exist for both sides. Considering the 80% BTTS in the last 5 matches, the low 5%/11% clean sheet rates and high average goals conceded 2.05/2.00, I select BTTS = Yes as more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and defensive metrics favor the Over: Stoke’s attacking xG is 1.05 versus Sheffield’s average xG conceded of 1.85, while Sheffield’s attacking xG is 0.91 against Stoke’s average xG conceded of 1.65. The mean of these pairs yields expected goals of 1.45 for Stoke and 1.28 for Sheffield, totaling 2.73 goals. Recent form corroborates this: in the last 5 matches Stoke scored 8 goals (avg. 1.6) and Sheffield scored 4 goals (avg. 0.8), while both teams conceded 11 goals across five games (2.2 per game), indicating vulnerable defenses. On a season level Over 1.5 occurred in 80% of Stoke’s matches and 84% of Sheffield’s, while Over 2.5 occurred in 50% and 63% of cases, so the signal for Over 1.5 is very strong and for Over 2.5 moderate. Based on this I estimate probabilities and recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (1.5: Over 85% / Under 15%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The selection I consider best to play is 1/1 — Stoke leading at the break and winning at full-time. In their last 5 matches Stoke led at the break in 2 of 5 games (40%), whereas Sheffield did not lead in any of their last 5 (0%); the first-half goals average was 1.0 for Stoke versus 0.4 for Sheffield. Over the same 5-game sample Stoke averaged 1.6 goals per match compared with Sheffield’s 0.8, and the average points at half-time were 1.8 for the home side versus 0.4 for the away side, indicating stronger first-half momentum from Stoke. Additionally, Stoke produce more xG (1.05 vs 0.91) and more shots (9.45 vs 7.47), despite a lower conversion rate (5% vs 10%), while Sheffield are trailing at the break in 63% of their away matches this season, which undermines their chances. Given the higher goals average and the half-time advantage in the last 5 matches, I assign the highest probability to the 1/1 scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Stoke City | Sheffield Wednesday | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Stoke City is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Stoke City · 0.2 pts / match - Sheffield Wednesday
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Stoke City is 90% better for: goals scored per match.
1.18 goals / match - Stoke City · 0.62 goals / match - Sheffield Wednesday
Stoke City is 85% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.1 goals / match - Stoke City · 2.03 goals / match - Sheffield Wednesday
Stoke City scores in 64% of matches (25 of 39 matches), while Sheffield Wednesday keeps a clean sheet in 8% (3 of 39 matches).
Sheffield Wednesday scores in 49% of matches (19 of 39 matches), while Stoke City keeps a clean sheet in 31% (12 of 39 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Stoke City
Over / Under - Sheffield Wednesday
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Stoke City is 85% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.46 pts / match - Stoke City · 0.79 pts / match - Sheffield Wednesday
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Stoke City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Sheffield Wednesday - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 3%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -16 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Stoke City
Sheffield Wednesday
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).
Teams vs league
| Stoke City | Liga | Sheffield Wednesday | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.28 | 2.58 | • 2.64 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 56% | ▼ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 46% | 50% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 25% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 62% | 71% | • 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 72% | 76% | ▲ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Stoke City 1 - 0 - 0 Sheffield Wednesday. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Stoke City vs Sheffield Wednesday?
The Championship match finished Stoke City 2:0 Sheffield Wednesday. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Stoke City vs Sheffield Wednesday?
Stoke City score 1.18 goals per game on average and Sheffield Wednesday 0.62. The Championship average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Stoke City's matches and 46% of Sheffield Wednesday's.
What form are Stoke City and Sheffield Wednesday in?
Over the last 5 games Stoke City have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Sheffield Wednesday 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Stoke City vs Sheffield Wednesday?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


