Strømmen vs Kongsvinger: match statistics
Strømmen vs Kongsvinger: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Strømmen played Kongsvinger in First Division (Norway). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Strømmen: 1-0-1, 1.50 points/match. Kongsvinger: 3-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Strømmen scores 2.50 and concedes 3.50 goals per match. Kongsvinger scores 2.67 and concedes 0.67. League average: 3.74 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Strømmen 50%, Kongsvinger 67%. Over 2.5: Strømmen 100%, Kongsvinger 100%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 78%.
xG, shots and style
Kongsvinger has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.11. Strømmen: 9.5 shots per match, Kongsvinger: 12.3.
Match halves
Strømmen: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.50. Kongsvinger: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 1.67.
Goals by minute
Strømmen: 76-90+ (2 goals). Kongsvinger: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 3.74 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 78%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kongsvinger is the clear favorite: they sit 1st and away they score on average 3.0 goals with 6 shots on target and 53% possession, while Strømmen at home average 0 goals, only 1 shot on target and 26% possession. The difference in chance quality is also visible in xG: Kongsvinger have 1.45 xG per away match versus Strømmen’s 0.76 xG at home, and a conversion rate of 30% versus 0% shows the visitors are more clinical with created chances. Defensively Strømmen concede on average 3.0 goals per home match (average xG against 1.63), while Kongsvinger concede 1.0 goal away (xG against 1.57), indicating greater defensive stability for the visitors. Although Strømmen have scored 11 goals in the last 5 matches and won 4 of 5 (points per match 2.4), all their issues concern home fixtures: 0 goals scored at home, 100% FTS and a home goal difference of -3. On that basis I predict a Kongsvinger win; I assess probabilities at 80% for the visitors, 12% for a draw and 8% for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The weight of signals favors BTTS - Yes: Kongsvinger has a seasonal BTTS rate of 100%, Strømmen 50%, and the league average BTTS is 55%, indicating an elevated probability of both teams scoring. Both sides show strong attacking metrics — Strømmen scores 2.5 goals per game on average, Kongsvinger 3.0, and in the last 5 matches 2.2 and 2.4 respectively; attacking xG is 1.82 (Strømmen) vs 1.45 (Kongsvinger) with xG against 1.61 vs 1.57, so both teams create and concede chances. Defensively, Strømmen has 50% clean sheets and concedes 0.5 goals on average this season, which slightly reduces BTTS probability, but Kongsvinger has 0% clean sheets and concedes 1.0 on average, so the risk of goals for both teams remains high. Additionally, both teams have 100% of matches over 2.5 goals this season, and Kongsvinger has 100% of matches combining Over2.5 and BTTS; equal average on-target shots 6 vs 6 and higher conversion for Kongsvinger (30% vs 19%) reinforce the both-teams-to-score scenario. Given these data I rate BTTS 'yes' 80% and 'no' 20% — the decisive factors are Kongsvinger's 100% BTTS and 100% Over2.5, which outweigh Strømmen's 50% clean sheets.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project a total of 3.23 goals in the match: expected xG adjusted for opponent defenses is 1.70 for Strømmen and 1.53 for Kongsvinger. Both teams have very strong goal-scoring profiles — season-long Over 2.5 is 100% for both home and away sides, and Over 2.5 occurred in 80% of the last 5 matches for each team. Additionally, the league averages 3.82 goals per game, and shot and conversion metrics indicate high chance production: Strømmen averages 13.5 shots with a 19% conversion, while Kongsvinger averages 10.0 shots with a 30% conversion. Kongsvinger has 100% Both Teams To Score, Strømmen has 50% clean sheets, which together suggest a propensity for goals from both sides and a lower likelihood of a goalless draw. Based on this, the strongest signal is Over 2.5 (selection: over at the 2.5 line) — expected 3.23 goals, season-long 100% Over 2.5 and 80% in the last 5 matches provide value edge over the under.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Data indicate a clear pattern: Kongsvinger led at the break in 100% of cases and average 2.0 goals by half-time, while Strømmen register only 0.5 goals in the first half. The visitors score very early — one goal in the 0–15 and 16–30 minute intervals respectively, whereas Strømmen tend to score just before the break and immediately after it (1.0 goals in 31–45 and 3.0 goals in 46–60 minutes). In the second half Strømmen average 2.0 goals and have won second halves in 100% of matches, and their xG of 1.82 versus the visitors’ 1.45 suggests the hosts create more chances. Kongsvinger are however very efficient from those chances (conversion rate 30.0% vs. Strømmen’s 19.0%), which explains the leads at the break, but the hosts’ positive second-half goal balance (+3.0) points toward a turnaround after the interval. On this basis my strongest scenario is HT/FT 2/1 (lead at the break for the visitors, hosts win the match) with an assigned probability of 45%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Strømmen | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 49% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.63 | 0.45 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kongsvinger is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.5 pts / match - Strømmen · 3 pts / match - Kongsvinger
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kongsvinger is 7% better for: goals scored per match.
2.5 goals / match - Strømmen · 2.67 goals / match - Kongsvinger
Kongsvinger is 422% better for: goals conceded per match.
3.5 goals / match - Strømmen · 0.67 goals / match - Kongsvinger
Strømmen scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).
Kongsvinger scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Strømmen keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Strømmen
Over / Under - Kongsvinger
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kongsvinger is 55% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Strømmen · 2.33 pts / match - Kongsvinger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Strømmen - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Kongsvinger - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.50 | 0.50 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.5 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.5 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.5 | 3.5 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 50% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 0% |
| No goal | 50% | 50% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.33 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.7 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Average goals in match | 1.3 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 67% |
| No goal | 33% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Strømmen
Kongsvinger
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Strømmen | Liga | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 6.00 | 3.74 | ▼ 3.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 52% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 78% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 24% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 78% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 87% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Strømmen vs Kongsvinger?
The First Division match finished Strømmen 2:2 Kongsvinger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Strømmen vs Kongsvinger?
Strømmen score 2.50 goals per game on average and Kongsvinger 2.67. The First Division average is 3.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 78% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Strømmen's matches and 67% of Kongsvinger's.
What form are Strømmen and Kongsvinger in?
Over the last 5 games Strømmen have a 1-0-1 record (1.50 points per game) and Kongsvinger 3-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Strømmen vs Kongsvinger?
The statistical background for Strømmen vs Kongsvinger — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.