Norway - First DivisionStrømmen StadionData current as of 05 September 2026

Strømmen vs Moss: match statistics

Strømmen crest
Strømmen
3 : 2half-time 2:1
Moss crest
Moss

Strømmen vs Moss: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Strømmen played Moss in First Division (Norway). The match was played on 27 June 2026. Venue: Strømmen Stadion. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Strømmen: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Moss: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Strømmen scores 1.25 and concedes 2.75 goals per match. Moss scores 1.75 and concedes 2.17. League average: 3.63 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Strømmen 50%, Moss 83%. Over 2.5: Strømmen 75%, Moss 83%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 72%.

xG, shots and style

Moss has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.26. Strømmen: 10.8 shots per match, Moss: 15.6.

Match halves

Strømmen: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.92. Moss: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.08.

Goals by minute

Strømmen: 76-90+ (6 goals). Moss: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division: 3.63 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 72%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict an away win ('2'). Moss holds a clear offensive advantage: averaging 2.0 goals scored away versus Strømmen's 1.0 at home, higher xG 1.91 vs 1.36 and more attempts—16.17 shots and 6.67 on target per game compared to the hosts' 12 shots and 3.67 on target. Strømmen concedes 2.83 goals per home match on average, has a negative goal difference of -11 and loses 67% of home matches, while Moss has a smaller negative away goal difference (-3) and better shot conversion (12% vs 8%). In the last 5 matches Strømmen recorded 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses with 0.8 points per game, whereas Moss has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses with 1.0 point per game, which further favors the visitors. Both teams allow many goals (Strømmen average total 3.83 and Moss away matches 4.5), so I expect an open, high-scoring game and a Moss victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 83% (Strømmen 83% vs Moss 83%), which is a strong signal for the "both teams to score" variant. Moss has recorded BTTS in 100% of their last 5 matches and scored 9 goals in those five games, while Strømmen has only 40% BTTS in the last 5 and 5 goals scored, which lowers confidence but does not negate the trend. Season averages show Strømmen scores 1.5 and concedes 1.83 per match, and Moss scores 2.0 and concedes 2.5, meaning both teams regularly score and concede. xG confirms this picture: Strømmen xG 1.64 vs xG against 1.73, Moss xG 1.91 vs xG against 1.85, suggesting real scoring chances for both sides. Additionally, low clean sheet percentages (Strømmen 17% vs Moss 0%) and high rates of matches over 2.5 goals (67% and 100%) favor BTTS, hence 80% on "Yes" and 20% on "No".

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model based on average xG and opponent defense yields 1.75 xG for Strømmen and 1.82 xG for Moss (total 3.57 expected goals); a Poisson distribution at this lambda translates to ~87% chance for Over 1.5, ~69% for Over 2.5 and ~48% for Over 3.5. Seasonal metrics confirm a high goal potential: Strømmen have 67% of matches Over 2.5, Moss 100% Over 2.5, and the league average is 3.63 goals per game. Both teams see BTTS in 83% of matches; Moss averages 6.67 shots on target and xG 1.91 versus Strømmen 4.5 SoT and xG 1.64, with conversion rates of 12% vs 10%, which favors goal exchanges. In the last 5 matches Strømmen score 1.0 and concede 1.6 on average, Moss score 1.8 and concede 2.4; Moss had 80% of those 5 matches Over 2.5 and 100% BTTS. The strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (recommendation: Over at the 1.5 line) — this has the highest probability (87%) at 3.57 xG; Over 2.5 (69%) also makes sense, while Over 3.5 is roughly a coin toss (48%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Data indicate an advantage for Moss: xG 1.91 versus 1.64 for the hosts, more shots on target 6.67 vs 4.5 and higher conversion 12% vs 10%, translating into greater chances for the visitors to win. In the last five matches Moss led at the break in 60% (3 of 5), and the average goals at half-time in those games are 1.2 for the visitors vs 0.2 for the hosts, so a scenario with the visitors leading after 45 minutes is dominant. The visitors are also stronger after the break: on average 1.33 goals in the second half, 100% of matches with at least 0.5 second-half goals and an average 1.5 points gained in the second half, which justifies the highest weighting for the 2/2 scenario. The hosts, however, often score late goals (5 goals in 76–90 min) and have led at the break in 50% of matches this season, so alternatives like X/2 (22%) or even 2/1 (7%) are considered as possible turnarounds. Both teams have a high percentage of matches with goals for both sides (BTTS 83% each), so the projection also allows for an HT/FT draw (X/X 12%), but with a preference for a final victory for the visitors.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
StrømmenMoss
11Shots12
StrømmenMoss
7Shots on target7
StrømmenMoss
1.54xG1.62
StrømmenMoss
4Corners4
StrømmenMoss
49Dangerous attacks52
StrømmenMoss
12Fouls12
StrømmenMoss
3Cards2
StrømmenMoss

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.25Goals scored / match1.75
StrømmenMoss
2.75Goals conceded / match2.17
StrømmenMoss
37%Average possession49%
StrømmenMoss
3.83Shots on target / match5.58
StrømmenMoss

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.83Shots per match15.58
StrømmenMoss
3.83Shots on target5.58
StrømmenMoss
11.5%Shot conversion11.2%
StrømmenMoss
37%Possession49%
StrømmenMoss
1.26xG for1.77
StrømmenMoss
1.52xG against1.79
StrømmenMoss

Shooting quality

Strømmen: BalancedMoss: Attacking
StrømmenMoss
Accuracy (shots on target)35%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Moss is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Strømmen · 1 pts / match - Moss

Strømmen
LLDLW
Season result split
17% W17% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-8
0.67 pts / match · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
DLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Moss
DLDWL
Season result split
42% W17% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-5
1.42 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-0-3
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.83Opponent xG: 2.12BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Moss is 40% better for: goals scored per match.

1.25 goals / match - Strømmen · 1.75 goals / match - Moss

Moss is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.75 goals / match - Strømmen · 2.17 goals / match - Moss

Strømmen scoring profile: very strong

Strømmen scores in 58% of matches (7 of 12 matches), while Moss keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 12 matches).

Moss scoring profile: very strong

Moss scores in 92% of matches (11 of 12 matches), while Strømmen keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 12 matches).

15Goals scored (season)21
StrømmenMoss
33Goals conceded (season)26
StrømmenMoss
4Average goals in match3.92
StrømmenMoss
5Goals scored (last 5)9
StrømmenMoss
8Goals conceded (last 5)12
StrømmenMoss

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal92%
StrømmenMoss
42%2 goals50%
StrømmenMoss
8%3 goals25%
StrømmenMoss
8%4 goals8%
StrømmenMoss

How often they concede at least...

92%1 goal92%
StrømmenMoss
83%2 goals75%
StrømmenMoss
50%3 goals33%
StrømmenMoss
25%4 goals17%
StrømmenMoss

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time25%
StrømmenMoss
25%BTTS in both halves0%
StrømmenMoss
25%Scored in both halves17%
StrømmenMoss

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS75%
StrømmenMoss
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
StrømmenMoss
40%BTTS - last 5100%
StrømmenMoss

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
StrømmenMoss
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
StrømmenMoss
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
StrømmenMoss

2nd half

92%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
StrømmenMoss
75%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
StrømmenMoss
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time42%
StrømmenMoss

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Moss is 116% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.58 pts / match - Strømmen · 1.25 pts / match - Moss

Strømmen - half-time state
8% leading33% draw58% trailing
Moss - half-time state
33% leading25% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.58Points per match (1st half)1.25
StrømmenMoss
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.67
StrømmenMoss
1.08Goals conceded (1st half)1
StrømmenMoss
1.42Average goals (1st half)1.67
StrømmenMoss
25%Clean sheet before half-time42%
StrømmenMoss
75%No goal before half-time58%
StrømmenMoss

After half-time (2nd half)

0.83Points per match (2nd half)1.33
StrømmenMoss
0.92Goals scored (2nd half)1.08
StrømmenMoss
1.67Goals conceded (2nd half)1.17
StrømmenMoss
2.58Average goals (2nd half)2.25
StrømmenMoss
17%Clean sheet after half-time33%
StrømmenMoss
42%No goal after half-time33%
StrømmenMoss

Strømmen - second-half results

17% W33% R50% P
7
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.58
PPG before half-time
Lead holding213%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Moss - second-half results

42% W8% R50% P
15
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Strømmen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.20
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Moss - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.000.60
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.81.6
Average goals in match2.02.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2-5
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Strømmen
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
1
4
16-30
2
6
31-45
1
4
46-60
4
8
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Moss
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
3
7
16-30
3
2
31-45
3
5
46-60
3
4
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.96
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 2.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Strømmen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
61%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
176%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

Moss

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

StrømmenLigaMoss
Average goals in match 4.003.63 3.92
Both teams scored 50%58% 83%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%72% 83%
Clean sheets 8%22% 8%
Goal before half-time 75%77% 75%
Goal after half-time 92%88% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.63
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
72%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
2.06
Home goals / match
1.56
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
39%
3 goals
18%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MossYellow cardSigurd Grönli
  2. StrømmenYellow cardCameron Crestani
  3. StrømmenYellow cardSindre Engja Rindal
  4. StrømmenYellow cardEven Rogne

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Strømmen vs Moss?

The First Division match finished Strømmen 3:2 Moss. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Strømmen vs Moss?

Strømmen score 1.25 goals per game on average and Moss 1.75. The First Division average is 3.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 72% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Strømmen's matches and 83% of Moss's.

What form are Strømmen and Moss in?

Over the last 5 games Strømmen have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Moss 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Strømmen vs Moss?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Strømmen vs Moss: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.